Biologic Augmentation of the Subscapularis Tendon During Anatomic Shoulder Arthroplasty: A prospective case series utilizing dynamic ultrasound

Amit Nathani
{"title":"Biologic Augmentation of the Subscapularis Tendon During Anatomic Shoulder Arthroplasty: A prospective case series utilizing dynamic ultrasound","authors":"Amit Nathani","doi":"10.60118/001c.39782","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Five consecutively eligible patients with primary glenohumeral osteoarthritis underwent anatomic shoulder arthroplasty utilizing a collagen-based biointegrative implant (TAPESTRY®) to augment subscapularis tendon repairs. Evaluation of subscapularis healing was primarily assessed via dynamic ultrasound examinations at 6 months post-operatively. Subscapularis imaging was evaluated for tendon thickness, width, echotexture, and calcification. All five patients exhibited fully healed tendons at 6 months with no re-tears, representing a decrease in the 50% occurrence of subscapularis tears historically evidenced in ultrasound studies following shoulder arthroplasty. The subscapularis tendon in all patients was shown to be intact, four of which demonstrated macroscopically aligned collagen tendon architecture with anatomic size measurements, and one demonstrated mild tendinosis. Secondary clinical outcomes included validated shoulder outcome scores including the American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) assessment preoperatively and at 3 months and 6 months postoperatively. Improvements in ASES scores were greater than two-times (33 points at 3 months, and 35 points at 6 months) the published minimal clinically important difference (MCID) of 13.6 ± 2.3 for total shoulder arthroplasty (TSA). Additional data collected included graded belly press, lift-off, and range of motion assessments measured preoperatively and at 6 months postoperatively. Biologic augmentation of the subscapularis tendon with a collagen-based biointegrative implant in these 5 patients showed 100% healing rates assessed via dynamic ultrasound at 6 months post-operatively. All patients demonstrated tendon healing without postoperative complications or revisions. Further investigation is needed to validate the observations from this pilot study.","PeriodicalId":298624,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Orthopaedic Experience & Innovation","volume":"11 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Orthopaedic Experience & Innovation","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.60118/001c.39782","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Five consecutively eligible patients with primary glenohumeral osteoarthritis underwent anatomic shoulder arthroplasty utilizing a collagen-based biointegrative implant (TAPESTRY®) to augment subscapularis tendon repairs. Evaluation of subscapularis healing was primarily assessed via dynamic ultrasound examinations at 6 months post-operatively. Subscapularis imaging was evaluated for tendon thickness, width, echotexture, and calcification. All five patients exhibited fully healed tendons at 6 months with no re-tears, representing a decrease in the 50% occurrence of subscapularis tears historically evidenced in ultrasound studies following shoulder arthroplasty. The subscapularis tendon in all patients was shown to be intact, four of which demonstrated macroscopically aligned collagen tendon architecture with anatomic size measurements, and one demonstrated mild tendinosis. Secondary clinical outcomes included validated shoulder outcome scores including the American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) assessment preoperatively and at 3 months and 6 months postoperatively. Improvements in ASES scores were greater than two-times (33 points at 3 months, and 35 points at 6 months) the published minimal clinically important difference (MCID) of 13.6 ± 2.3 for total shoulder arthroplasty (TSA). Additional data collected included graded belly press, lift-off, and range of motion assessments measured preoperatively and at 6 months postoperatively. Biologic augmentation of the subscapularis tendon with a collagen-based biointegrative implant in these 5 patients showed 100% healing rates assessed via dynamic ultrasound at 6 months post-operatively. All patients demonstrated tendon healing without postoperative complications or revisions. Further investigation is needed to validate the observations from this pilot study.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
肩胛下肌腱在解剖肩关节成形术中的生物增强:利用动态超声的前瞻性病例系列
5例原发性肩关节骨性关节炎患者连续接受了基于胶原蛋白的生物整合植入物(TAPESTRY®)的解剖性肩关节置换术,以增强肩胛下肌腱修复。术后6个月通过动态超声检查评估肩胛下肌愈合情况。肩胛下肌成像评估肌腱厚度、宽度、回声结构和钙化情况。所有5例患者在6个月时均表现出肌腱完全愈合,无再次撕裂,这表明肩胛下肌撕裂的发生率减少了50%,这在肩关节置换术后的超声研究中得到了历史证据。所有患者的肩胛下肌腱均完好,其中4例显示宏观排列的胶原肌腱结构,解剖尺寸测量,1例显示轻度肌腱萎缩。次要临床结果包括经过验证的肩部预后评分,包括术前、术后3个月和6个月的美国肩关节外科医生(ASES)评估。全肩关节置换术(TSA)的最小临床重要差异(MCID)为13.6±2.3,而asa评分的改善大于2倍(3个月时33分,6个月时35分)。收集的其他数据包括术前和术后6个月测量的分级腹部按压、抬离和活动范围评估。术后6个月,通过动态超声评估,这5例患者肩胛下肌腱的胶原基生物整合植入物的生物增强率为100%。所有患者均表现出肌腱愈合,无术后并发症或修复。需要进一步的调查来验证这一初步研究的观察结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
“In My Experience…15 Data Points To Better Evaluate Platelet Rich Plasma Kits And Protocols” “In My Experience…Mentorship in Orthopaedic Surgery” A New Paradigm in the Management of Knee Osteoarthritis and Arthroplasty with Dynamic Patient-source Outcome Measures: Comprehensive Clinical Review of the Knee Kinesiography Exam with the KneeKG® System Latarjet Classics: An Analysis of The 50 Most-Cited Articles on The Latarjet Procedure “In My Experience…Medical Device Design & Innovation in Shoulder Replacements”
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1