Fairness is not static: deeper understanding of long term fairness via simulation studies

A. D'Amour, Hansa Srinivasan, James Atwood, P. Baljekar, D. Sculley, Yoni Halpern
{"title":"Fairness is not static: deeper understanding of long term fairness via simulation studies","authors":"A. D'Amour, Hansa Srinivasan, James Atwood, P. Baljekar, D. Sculley, Yoni Halpern","doi":"10.1145/3351095.3372878","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"As machine learning becomes increasingly incorporated within high impact decision ecosystems, there is a growing need to understand the long-term behaviors of deployed ML-based decision systems and their potential consequences. Most approaches to understanding or improving the fairness of these systems have focused on static settings without considering long-term dynamics. This is understandable; long term dynamics are hard to assess, particularly because they do not align with the traditional supervised ML research framework that uses fixed data sets. To address this structural difficulty in the field, we advocate for the use of simulation as a key tool in studying the fairness of algorithms. We explore three toy examples of dynamical systems that have been previously studied in the context of fair decision making for bank loans, college admissions, and allocation of attention. By analyzing how learning agents interact with these systems in simulation, we are able to extend previous work, showing that static or single-step analyses do not give a complete picture of the long-term consequences of an ML-based decision system. We provide an extensible open-source software framework for implementing fairness-focused simulation studies and further reproducible research, available at https://github.com/google/ml-fairness-gym.","PeriodicalId":377829,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the 2020 Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency","volume":"34 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-01-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"161","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the 2020 Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/3351095.3372878","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 161

Abstract

As machine learning becomes increasingly incorporated within high impact decision ecosystems, there is a growing need to understand the long-term behaviors of deployed ML-based decision systems and their potential consequences. Most approaches to understanding or improving the fairness of these systems have focused on static settings without considering long-term dynamics. This is understandable; long term dynamics are hard to assess, particularly because they do not align with the traditional supervised ML research framework that uses fixed data sets. To address this structural difficulty in the field, we advocate for the use of simulation as a key tool in studying the fairness of algorithms. We explore three toy examples of dynamical systems that have been previously studied in the context of fair decision making for bank loans, college admissions, and allocation of attention. By analyzing how learning agents interact with these systems in simulation, we are able to extend previous work, showing that static or single-step analyses do not give a complete picture of the long-term consequences of an ML-based decision system. We provide an extensible open-source software framework for implementing fairness-focused simulation studies and further reproducible research, available at https://github.com/google/ml-fairness-gym.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
公平不是静态的:通过模拟研究更深入地理解长期的公平
随着机器学习越来越多地融入到高影响力的决策生态系统中,人们越来越需要了解部署的基于ml的决策系统的长期行为及其潜在后果。大多数理解或提高这些系统公平性的方法都集中在静态设置上,而没有考虑长期动态。这可以理解;长期动态很难评估,特别是因为它们与使用固定数据集的传统监督机器学习研究框架不一致。为了解决该领域的这种结构性困难,我们提倡使用仿真作为研究算法公平性的关键工具。我们探索了三个动力系统的玩具例子,这些例子之前在银行贷款、大学录取和注意力分配的公平决策背景下进行了研究。通过分析学习代理如何在模拟中与这些系统交互,我们能够扩展以前的工作,表明静态或单步分析并不能给出基于ml的决策系统的长期后果的完整图景。我们提供了一个可扩展的开源软件框架,用于实现以公平为重点的模拟研究和进一步的可重复研究,可在https://github.com/google/ml-fairness-gym上获得。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Dirichlet uncertainty wrappers for actionable algorithm accuracy accountability and auditability Algorithmic targeting of social policies: fairness, accuracy, and distributed governance Regulating transparency?: Facebook, Twitter and the German Network Enforcement Act CtrlZ.AI zine fair: critical perspectives Fairness, accountability, transparency in AI at scale: lessons from national programs
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1