Comparison of titanium elastic nailing and spica casting outcomes in preschool children following femoral diaphyseal fractures

Muahmmad Ikram, Ejaz Rao, Nadia Gul, Sadia Ijaz, M. Memon, Sohail Muzammil
{"title":"Comparison of titanium elastic nailing and spica casting outcomes in preschool children following femoral diaphyseal fractures","authors":"Muahmmad Ikram, Ejaz Rao, Nadia Gul, Sadia Ijaz, M. Memon, Sohail Muzammil","doi":"10.37723/jumdc.v14i3.818","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"BACKGROUND & OBJECTIVE: Pediatric femoral diaphyseal fractures are common fractures in preschool children. The titanium elastic nailing technique is becoming prevalent in developed and developing countries. To compare the frequency of efficacy, safety and mean surgical fixation outcomes among patients who underwent titanium elastic nailing versus spica casting in diaphyseal femur fractures \nMETHODOLOGY: A prospective study was conducted at department of orthopedics, Pakistan Ordinance Factory (POF) hospital. The study duration was 2 years (March 2018-March 2020). A sample size of 42 children was calculated using WHO calculator. Children selection was made on the basis of non-probability (consecutive) sampling. Group TEN underwent titanium elastic nailing, while group SPICA underwent hip spica casting. Patients were followed for six months. We used SPSS version 24 for the analysis of data. Fisher exacts and independent T-test were applied for measuring associations and comparisons of two groups. P-value ≤0.05 was considered significant. \nRESULTS: Total of 42 patients were included in the study. The mean age of patients was 3.4 years±1.4SD. The TEN group showed satisfactory results in malalignment (p=0.000) and complications (p=0.000). SPICA group showed significantly high assisted weight bearing duration (p=0.000), full weight bearing duration (p=0.000), greater operative time (p=0.000), lower range of motion (p=0.000) and less patient satisfaction (p=0.000) as compared to TEN group. \nCONCLUSION: Titanium elastic nailing is safe, effective, and allows faster recovery in pediatric patients with diaphyseal femoral fractures. We recommend titanium elastic nailing as a valid treatment option for femur fractures in preschool children.","PeriodicalId":178216,"journal":{"name":"Journal of University Medical & Dental College","volume":"202 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of University Medical & Dental College","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.37723/jumdc.v14i3.818","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

BACKGROUND & OBJECTIVE: Pediatric femoral diaphyseal fractures are common fractures in preschool children. The titanium elastic nailing technique is becoming prevalent in developed and developing countries. To compare the frequency of efficacy, safety and mean surgical fixation outcomes among patients who underwent titanium elastic nailing versus spica casting in diaphyseal femur fractures METHODOLOGY: A prospective study was conducted at department of orthopedics, Pakistan Ordinance Factory (POF) hospital. The study duration was 2 years (March 2018-March 2020). A sample size of 42 children was calculated using WHO calculator. Children selection was made on the basis of non-probability (consecutive) sampling. Group TEN underwent titanium elastic nailing, while group SPICA underwent hip spica casting. Patients were followed for six months. We used SPSS version 24 for the analysis of data. Fisher exacts and independent T-test were applied for measuring associations and comparisons of two groups. P-value ≤0.05 was considered significant. RESULTS: Total of 42 patients were included in the study. The mean age of patients was 3.4 years±1.4SD. The TEN group showed satisfactory results in malalignment (p=0.000) and complications (p=0.000). SPICA group showed significantly high assisted weight bearing duration (p=0.000), full weight bearing duration (p=0.000), greater operative time (p=0.000), lower range of motion (p=0.000) and less patient satisfaction (p=0.000) as compared to TEN group. CONCLUSION: Titanium elastic nailing is safe, effective, and allows faster recovery in pediatric patients with diaphyseal femoral fractures. We recommend titanium elastic nailing as a valid treatment option for femur fractures in preschool children.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
学龄前儿童股骨干骨折后钛弹性钉与spica铸造效果比较
背景与目的:儿童股骨干骨折是学龄前儿童常见的骨折。钛弹性钉技术在发达国家和发展中国家越来越流行。为了比较采用钛弹性钉与spica铸造治疗股骨骨干骨折患者的疗效、安全性和平均手术固定效果的频率。方法:巴基斯坦规定工厂医院骨科进行了一项前瞻性研究。研究时间为2年(2018年3月- 2020年3月)。使用世卫组织计算器计算42名儿童的样本量。儿童选择是在非概率(连续)抽样的基础上进行的。10组采用钛弹性钉,SPICA组采用髋部SPICA铸造。患者随访6个月。我们使用SPSS version 24对数据进行分析。采用Fisher精确检验和独立t检验来衡量两组间的相关性和比较。p值≤0.05为显著性。结果:共纳入42例患者。患者平均年龄为3.4岁±1.4SD。TEN组在矫正不正(p=0.000)和并发症(p=0.000)方面均取得了满意的效果。SPICA组辅助负重时间(p=0.000)、全负重时间(p=0.000)、手术时间(p=0.000)、活动范围(p=0.000)和患者满意度(p=0.000)均显著高于TEN组。结论:钛弹性钉治疗小儿股骨干骨折安全、有效、恢复快。我们推荐钛弹性钉作为治疗学龄前儿童股骨骨折的有效选择。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Online Teaching and its challenges faced by Anatomists in Pakistan: A post-pandemic Knowledge, Attitude, and Perception regarding antibiotic use and its associated resistance among the general public in Lahore, Pakistan. Pause procedure to enhance learning during the lectures in Medical Colleges Impact of transurethral resection of the prostate on erectile function in benign prostatic hyperplasia patients: a descriptive study at a tertiary care hospital Multidisciplinary care plan and adherence to clinical practice guidelines is needed to improve breast cancer outcome in Pakistan
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1