Validation of Complexity Metrics of Agent-Based Systems Using Weyuker's Axioms

D. Ponnurangam, N. Saravanan, K. Satheskumar
{"title":"Validation of Complexity Metrics of Agent-Based Systems Using Weyuker's Axioms","authors":"D. Ponnurangam, N. Saravanan, K. Satheskumar","doi":"10.1109/ICIT.2008.59","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Agent-oriented software, in spite of its increased complexity levels, emphasize on social ability, autonomy, reactivity, adaptability, intelligence, learning, proactivity, goal-oriented and mobility. In general the complexity of the software agent is divided into two aspects; computational complexity and psychological complexity and they should be measured on both concrete aspects. The fact of high computational complexity leads to a weak performance indicates the importance of correctness in complexity measurements. Hence the concept of complexity metrics validation plays a significant role in the complexity measurement theory. This work describes a standard procedure for validating complexity metrics of agent-based systems. The validation procedure narrated in this paper uses the method proposed by Weyuker. The nine axioms of Weyuker are used to determine the effectiveness of various complexity metrics of agent-based systems. The result defines the extent of satisfaction of validation axioms in case of agent complexity metrics.","PeriodicalId":184201,"journal":{"name":"2008 International Conference on Information Technology","volume":"46 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2008-12-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2008 International Conference on Information Technology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICIT.2008.59","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

Agent-oriented software, in spite of its increased complexity levels, emphasize on social ability, autonomy, reactivity, adaptability, intelligence, learning, proactivity, goal-oriented and mobility. In general the complexity of the software agent is divided into two aspects; computational complexity and psychological complexity and they should be measured on both concrete aspects. The fact of high computational complexity leads to a weak performance indicates the importance of correctness in complexity measurements. Hence the concept of complexity metrics validation plays a significant role in the complexity measurement theory. This work describes a standard procedure for validating complexity metrics of agent-based systems. The validation procedure narrated in this paper uses the method proposed by Weyuker. The nine axioms of Weyuker are used to determine the effectiveness of various complexity metrics of agent-based systems. The result defines the extent of satisfaction of validation axioms in case of agent complexity metrics.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
基于Weyuker公理的智能体系统复杂度度量验证
面向agent的软件,尽管其复杂性水平有所提高,但强调社交能力、自主性、反应性、适应性、智能、学习、主动性、目标导向和移动性。一般来说,软件代理的复杂性分为两个方面;计算复杂性和心理复杂性应该从这两个具体的方面来衡量。计算复杂度高导致性能差的事实表明,正确性在复杂性测量中的重要性。因此,复杂性度量验证的概念在复杂性度量理论中起着重要的作用。这项工作描述了验证基于代理的系统的复杂性度量的标准过程。本文叙述的验证过程采用了Weyuker提出的方法。使用Weyuker的九个公理来确定基于智能体的系统的各种复杂性度量的有效性。结果定义了在代理复杂度度量的情况下验证公理的满足程度。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Overheads and Mean Route Failure Time of a Hybrid Protocol for Node-Disjoint Multipath Routing in Mobile Ad Hoc Networks Integrated Genomic Island Prediction Tool (IGIPT) Assignment of Cells to Switches in a Cellular Mobile Environment Using Swarm Intelligence Prediction of Protein Functional Sites Using Novel String Kernels Pairwise DNA Alignment with Sequence Specific Transition-Transversion Ratio Using Multiple Parameter Sets
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1