ShortCut

Xianzheng Dou, Peter M. Chen, J. Flinn
{"title":"ShortCut","authors":"Xianzheng Dou, Peter M. Chen, J. Flinn","doi":"10.1145/3341301.3359659","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Applications commonly perform repeated computations that are mostly, but not exactly, similar. If a subsequent computation were identical to the original, the operating system could improve performance via memoization, i.e., capturing the differences in program state caused by the computation and applying the differences in lieu of re-executing the computation. However, opportunities for generic memoization are limited by a myriad of differences that arise during execution, e.g., timestamps differ and communication yields non-deterministic responses. Such difference cause memoization to produce incorrect state. ShortCut generically accelerates mostly-deterministic computation by partial memoization. It creates a program, called a slice, that modifies the state diff to account for variation in a subsequent computation. ShortCut learns which inputs, data flows and control flows are likely, and makes assumptions about possible values for each during slice generation. Assuming only likely values rather than allowing all possible values makes complex slice generation feasible and slice execution much faster. Slices are self-verifying; they include predicates that verify all assumptions made during a subsequent execution. When these verifications succeed, the slice is guaranteed to produce a correct modification. If a verification fails, ShortCut transparently rolls back the slice execution and runs the non-memoized computation. Users see no difference between normal, memoized, and rolled-back execution.","PeriodicalId":331561,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the 27th ACM Symposium on Operating Systems Principles","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-10-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the 27th ACM Symposium on Operating Systems Principles","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/3341301.3359659","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

Applications commonly perform repeated computations that are mostly, but not exactly, similar. If a subsequent computation were identical to the original, the operating system could improve performance via memoization, i.e., capturing the differences in program state caused by the computation and applying the differences in lieu of re-executing the computation. However, opportunities for generic memoization are limited by a myriad of differences that arise during execution, e.g., timestamps differ and communication yields non-deterministic responses. Such difference cause memoization to produce incorrect state. ShortCut generically accelerates mostly-deterministic computation by partial memoization. It creates a program, called a slice, that modifies the state diff to account for variation in a subsequent computation. ShortCut learns which inputs, data flows and control flows are likely, and makes assumptions about possible values for each during slice generation. Assuming only likely values rather than allowing all possible values makes complex slice generation feasible and slice execution much faster. Slices are self-verifying; they include predicates that verify all assumptions made during a subsequent execution. When these verifications succeed, the slice is guaranteed to produce a correct modification. If a verification fails, ShortCut transparently rolls back the slice execution and runs the non-memoized computation. Users see no difference between normal, memoized, and rolled-back execution.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
快捷方式
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
TASO Gerenuk The inflection point hypothesis: a principled debugging approach for locating the root cause of a failure Yodel I4
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1