A Software Tool to Measure the Alignment of Assessment Instrument with a Set of Learning Objectives of a Course

R. Ramesh, M. Sasikumar, Sridhar V. Iyer
{"title":"A Software Tool to Measure the Alignment of Assessment Instrument with a Set of Learning Objectives of a Course","authors":"R. Ramesh, M. Sasikumar, Sridhar V. Iyer","doi":"10.1109/ICALT.2016.10","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In this paper, we present a software tool to measure alignment of Assessment instrument (AI) with a set of learning objectives (LOs) of a course. Alignment of syllabus, LO and AI is a major parameter determining the quality of an AI. The tool helps to considerably reduce the time and effort needed by teachers to ensure this alignment. It takes syllabus, a set of LOs and domain ontology as input. An ontology based knowledge representation mechanism is designed to integrate the contents of syllabus, LOs and AI. Alignment is measured in terms of both concepts covered and cognitive level used. The Data Structures course of second year engineering curriculum is chosen as the domain. The accuracy of this tool is tested by comparing the system generated alignment measure with the expert teachers and a confusion matrix is generated. We got an average accuracy of 90% for concepts alignment and 95% agreement in cognitive level alignment.","PeriodicalId":188900,"journal":{"name":"2016 IEEE 16th International Conference on Advanced Learning Technologies (ICALT)","volume":"42 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2016 IEEE 16th International Conference on Advanced Learning Technologies (ICALT)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICALT.2016.10","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

In this paper, we present a software tool to measure alignment of Assessment instrument (AI) with a set of learning objectives (LOs) of a course. Alignment of syllabus, LO and AI is a major parameter determining the quality of an AI. The tool helps to considerably reduce the time and effort needed by teachers to ensure this alignment. It takes syllabus, a set of LOs and domain ontology as input. An ontology based knowledge representation mechanism is designed to integrate the contents of syllabus, LOs and AI. Alignment is measured in terms of both concepts covered and cognitive level used. The Data Structures course of second year engineering curriculum is chosen as the domain. The accuracy of this tool is tested by comparing the system generated alignment measure with the expert teachers and a confusion matrix is generated. We got an average accuracy of 90% for concepts alignment and 95% agreement in cognitive level alignment.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
一种衡量评估工具与课程学习目标的一致性的软件工具
在本文中,我们提出了一个软件工具来衡量评估工具(AI)与课程的一组学习目标(LOs)的一致性。教学大纲、学习目标和人工智能的一致性是决定人工智能质量的主要参数。该工具有助于大大减少教师确保这种一致性所需的时间和精力。它以教学大纲、一组LOs和领域本体为输入。设计了一种基于本体的知识表示机制,将教学大纲的内容、教学目标和人工智能相结合。根据所涵盖的概念和所使用的认知水平来衡量一致性。选择工程二年级的数据结构课程作为研究领域。通过将系统生成的对齐度量与专家教师的对齐度量进行比较,测试了该工具的准确性,并生成了混淆矩阵。概念对齐的平均准确率为90%,认知水平对齐的平均准确率为95%。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The Impact of a Mobile Augmented Reality Game: Changing Students' Perceptions of the Complexity of Socioscientific Reasoning The Effects of Physical form and Embodied Action in a Teachable Robot for Geometry Learning A Pilot Study of Students' Perceptions of Collaborative Knowledge Building in 21st Century Learning with Their Knowledge Building Behaviors Facilitating Comprehension of Non-Native English Speakers During Lectures in English with STR-Texts Lessons Learned from Students' Cheat Sheets: Generic Models for Designing Programming Study Guides
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1