"A Special Operation": A Quantitative Approach to Dissecting and Comparing Different Media Ecosystems' Coverage of the Russo-Ukrainian War

Hans W. A. Hanley, Deepak Kumar, Z. Durumeric
{"title":"\"A Special Operation\": A Quantitative Approach to Dissecting and Comparing Different Media Ecosystems' Coverage of the Russo-Ukrainian War","authors":"Hans W. A. Hanley, Deepak Kumar, Z. Durumeric","doi":"10.48550/arXiv.2210.03016","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The coverage of the Russian invasion of Ukraine has varied widely between Western, Russian, and Chinese media ecosystems with propaganda, disinformation, and narrative spins present in all three. By utilizing the normalized pointwise mutual information metric, differential sentiment analysis, word2vec models, and partially labeled Dirichlet allocation, we present a quantitative analysis of the differences in coverage amongst these three news ecosystems. We find that while the Western press outlets have focused on the military and humanitarian aspects of the war, Russian media have focused on the purported justifications for the “special military operation” such as the presence in Ukraine of “bio-weapons” and “neo-nazis”, and Chinese news media have concentrated on the conflict’s diplomatic and economic consequences. Detecting the presence of several Russian disinformation narratives in the articles of several Chinese media outlets, we finally measure the degree to which Russian media has influenced Chinese coverage across Chinese outlets’ news articles, Weibo accounts, and Twitter accounts. Our analysis indicates that since the Russian invasion of Ukraine, Chinese state media outlets have increasingly cited Russian outlets as news sources and spread Russian disinformation narratives.","PeriodicalId":175641,"journal":{"name":"International Conference on Web and Social Media","volume":"63 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-10-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"10","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Conference on Web and Social Media","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2210.03016","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 10

Abstract

The coverage of the Russian invasion of Ukraine has varied widely between Western, Russian, and Chinese media ecosystems with propaganda, disinformation, and narrative spins present in all three. By utilizing the normalized pointwise mutual information metric, differential sentiment analysis, word2vec models, and partially labeled Dirichlet allocation, we present a quantitative analysis of the differences in coverage amongst these three news ecosystems. We find that while the Western press outlets have focused on the military and humanitarian aspects of the war, Russian media have focused on the purported justifications for the “special military operation” such as the presence in Ukraine of “bio-weapons” and “neo-nazis”, and Chinese news media have concentrated on the conflict’s diplomatic and economic consequences. Detecting the presence of several Russian disinformation narratives in the articles of several Chinese media outlets, we finally measure the degree to which Russian media has influenced Chinese coverage across Chinese outlets’ news articles, Weibo accounts, and Twitter accounts. Our analysis indicates that since the Russian invasion of Ukraine, Chinese state media outlets have increasingly cited Russian outlets as news sources and spread Russian disinformation narratives.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
“一次特殊行动”:分析和比较不同媒体生态系统对俄乌战争报道的定量方法
俄罗斯入侵乌克兰的报道在西方、俄罗斯和中国媒体生态系统之间存在很大差异,其中包括宣传、虚假信息和叙事旋转。利用归一化的点互信息度量、差分情感分析、word2vec模型和部分标记的Dirichlet分配,我们对这三个新闻生态系统之间的覆盖差异进行了定量分析。我们发现,当西方媒体关注战争的军事和人道主义方面时,俄罗斯媒体关注的是所谓的“特殊军事行动”的理由,比如在乌克兰存在“生物武器”和“新纳粹分子”,而中国新闻媒体关注的是冲突的外交和经济后果。在几家中国媒体的文章中发现了一些俄罗斯虚假信息叙事的存在,我们最终衡量了俄罗斯媒体在中国媒体的新闻文章、微博账户和推特账户中影响中国报道的程度。我们的分析表明,自俄罗斯入侵乌克兰以来,中国官方媒体越来越多地引用俄罗斯媒体作为新闻来源,并传播俄罗斯的虚假信息叙事。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
RTANet: Recommendation Target-Aware Network Embedding Who Is behind a Trend? Temporal Analysis of Interactions among Trend Participants on Twitter Host-Centric Social Connectedness of Migrants in Europe on Facebook Recipe Networks and the Principles of Healthy Food on the Web Social Influence-Maximizing Group Recommendation
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1