THE EFFECT OF COOPERATIVE LEARNING MODELS ON INCREASING LEARNING RESULTS AND STUDENT ACTIVITIES IN MATHEMATIC LESSONS

Nur Alim Noor, I. Munandar
{"title":"THE EFFECT OF COOPERATIVE LEARNING MODELS ON INCREASING LEARNING RESULTS AND STUDENT ACTIVITIES IN MATHEMATIC LESSONS","authors":"Nur Alim Noor, I. Munandar","doi":"10.31327/JOMEDU.V4I1.883","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study aims to determine the effect of cooperative learning models on improving learning outcomes and student learning activities in mathematics. This type of research is quantitative. The research design used was quasi-experimental by taking three sample classes. Two as the experimental class that received the treatment of cooperative learning model type Team Assisted Individualization (TAI) and Think Pair Share (TPS) type. One control class received conventional method treatment. The sample was taken from class X Kosgoro Vocational School Karawang Regency with a sample size of 90 students. Data was taken by post test by using objective test instruments with 25 multiple choice items for learning mathematics matrix material and for student learning activity data using a questionnaire consisting of 30 items in the Likert point 5. The results of data analysis showed that TAI learning was better than Conventional, can be proved statistically (LSD table) that the mathematics learning outcomes are Sig = 0.002 and for learning activities Sig = 0.000, both are smaller than α = 0.05. This proves that TAI learning is better than conventional seen from the results of learning and student learning activities. Learning TPS is better than Conventional, can be proven statistically (LSD table) that for mathematics learning outcomes obtained Sig = 0.684 greater than α = 0.05 and for learning activities obtained Sig = 0.002 smaller than α = 0.05. This proves that TPS learning is better than Conventional seen from student learning activities even for student learning outcomes there is no difference. Based on the data analysis, it can be concluded that the application of cooperative learning models can influence the increase in mathematics learning outcomes and student learning activities.","PeriodicalId":337698,"journal":{"name":"JME (Journal of Mathematics Education)","volume":"118 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JME (Journal of Mathematics Education)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31327/JOMEDU.V4I1.883","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

This study aims to determine the effect of cooperative learning models on improving learning outcomes and student learning activities in mathematics. This type of research is quantitative. The research design used was quasi-experimental by taking three sample classes. Two as the experimental class that received the treatment of cooperative learning model type Team Assisted Individualization (TAI) and Think Pair Share (TPS) type. One control class received conventional method treatment. The sample was taken from class X Kosgoro Vocational School Karawang Regency with a sample size of 90 students. Data was taken by post test by using objective test instruments with 25 multiple choice items for learning mathematics matrix material and for student learning activity data using a questionnaire consisting of 30 items in the Likert point 5. The results of data analysis showed that TAI learning was better than Conventional, can be proved statistically (LSD table) that the mathematics learning outcomes are Sig = 0.002 and for learning activities Sig = 0.000, both are smaller than α = 0.05. This proves that TAI learning is better than conventional seen from the results of learning and student learning activities. Learning TPS is better than Conventional, can be proven statistically (LSD table) that for mathematics learning outcomes obtained Sig = 0.684 greater than α = 0.05 and for learning activities obtained Sig = 0.002 smaller than α = 0.05. This proves that TPS learning is better than Conventional seen from student learning activities even for student learning outcomes there is no difference. Based on the data analysis, it can be concluded that the application of cooperative learning models can influence the increase in mathematics learning outcomes and student learning activities.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
合作学习模式对提高数学课堂学习效果和学生活动的影响
本研究旨在探讨合作学习模式对提高数学学习成果和学生学习活动的影响。这种类型的研究是定量的。本研究采用准实验设计,选取三个样本班级。两组作为实验班接受合作学习模式型团队辅助个性化(Team Assisted Individualization, TAI)和思维对分享(Think Pair Share, TPS)的治疗。一个对照组接受常规方法治疗。样本取自卡拉旺县科斯戈罗职业学校X班,样本量为90名学生。数据采用后测,采用客观测试工具,采用25项多项选择来获取数学矩阵材料的学习数据,采用李克特点5的30项问卷来获取学生学习活动数据。数据分析结果显示,TAI学习效果优于常规学习,数理学习效果Sig = 0.002,学习活动效果Sig = 0.000,均小于α = 0.05。从学习的结果和学生的学习活动来看,这证明了TAI学习优于传统学习。学习TPS优于常规,可以通过统计学(LSD表)证明,数学学习成果获得的Sig = 0.684大于α = 0.05,学习活动获得的Sig = 0.002小于α = 0.05。这证明,从学生的学习活动来看,TPS学习优于常规学习,即使对于学生的学习成果也没有差异。通过数据分析,可以得出结论,合作学习模式的应用可以影响数学学习成果的提高和学生学习活动的增加。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
THE ROLE OF MOODLE IN EDUCATION: A BIBLIOMETRIC REVIEW EXPLORATION OF MATHEMATICAL OBJECTS IN THE BALALE TRADITION AS AN EFFORT FOR MODULING IN THE DAYAK SALAKO CULTURE AT NYARUMKOP Systematic Literature Review: MATHEMATICAL CONNECTIONS THROUGH PROBLEM-BASED LEARNING IN TERMS OF ADVERSITY QUOTIENT RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN STUDENT DIFFERENTIAL AND INTEGRAL CALCULUS LEARNING OUTCOMES TO STUDENT DIFFERENTIAL EQUATIONS LEARNING OUTCOMES Math Picture Story Media: Its Implementation On Learning Outcomes And Motivation Of Elementary School Students
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1