A Lighthouse for Urban Agriculture: University, Community, and Redefining Expertise in the Food System

M. Wit
{"title":"A Lighthouse for Urban Agriculture: University, Community, and Redefining Expertise in the Food System","authors":"M. Wit","doi":"10.1525/GFC.2014.14.1.9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article advances the concept of the agroecological “lighthouse” as a civic space for learning and participating in the principles and practices of urban food production. As urbanization threatens to encourage the increased industrialization of agriculture, growing food in cities promises to alleviate this pressure while creating new opportunities for community empowerment and greater access to sustainable, healthy, and affordable food. This kind of transition, I argue, will demand social relations that bridge science, practice, and movement—and that cut in surprising ways across traditional boundaries between university and community. Drawing from a recent experience in an Urban Agroecology shortcourse in Berkeley, California, I illustrate what such relationships might look like, profiling the caretaker of one backyard garden in the Bay Area. This urban grower effuses what James Scott calls metis , moving fluidly across institutional boundaries, experimenting with agroecological innovations, and offering his space as a lighthouse commons for participatory learning. Interestingly, he is not a PhD, but a retired postal worker. With the stakes mounting for progress in food security across the urban-rural divide, the agroecological lighthouse opens up potential for new researcher-farmer partnerships as well as a means for expanding what we consider legitimate knowledge-making communities. Advancing the notion of a “lighthouse extension model,” I challenge the discourse of mainstream cooperative extension, arguing that a more egalitarian food system will likely emerge from participation by those traditionally excluded from shaping it.","PeriodicalId":429420,"journal":{"name":"Gastronomica: The Journal of Critical Food Studies","volume":"37 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2014-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"7","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Gastronomica: The Journal of Critical Food Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1525/GFC.2014.14.1.9","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 7

Abstract

This article advances the concept of the agroecological “lighthouse” as a civic space for learning and participating in the principles and practices of urban food production. As urbanization threatens to encourage the increased industrialization of agriculture, growing food in cities promises to alleviate this pressure while creating new opportunities for community empowerment and greater access to sustainable, healthy, and affordable food. This kind of transition, I argue, will demand social relations that bridge science, practice, and movement—and that cut in surprising ways across traditional boundaries between university and community. Drawing from a recent experience in an Urban Agroecology shortcourse in Berkeley, California, I illustrate what such relationships might look like, profiling the caretaker of one backyard garden in the Bay Area. This urban grower effuses what James Scott calls metis , moving fluidly across institutional boundaries, experimenting with agroecological innovations, and offering his space as a lighthouse commons for participatory learning. Interestingly, he is not a PhD, but a retired postal worker. With the stakes mounting for progress in food security across the urban-rural divide, the agroecological lighthouse opens up potential for new researcher-farmer partnerships as well as a means for expanding what we consider legitimate knowledge-making communities. Advancing the notion of a “lighthouse extension model,” I challenge the discourse of mainstream cooperative extension, arguing that a more egalitarian food system will likely emerge from participation by those traditionally excluded from shaping it.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
都市农业的灯塔:大学、社区和重新定义食品系统中的专业知识
本文提出了农业生态“灯塔”的概念,作为学习和参与城市粮食生产原则和实践的公民空间。由于城市化有可能鼓励农业进一步工业化,在城市种植粮食有望缓解这种压力,同时为社区赋权创造新的机会,并使人们更容易获得可持续、健康和负担得起的粮食。我认为,这种转变将要求社会关系在科学、实践和运动之间架起桥梁,并以令人惊讶的方式跨越大学和社区之间的传统界限。根据最近在加州伯克利的城市农业生态学短期课程中的经验,我通过描述湾区一个后院花园的管理员来说明这种关系可能是什么样子的。这个城市种植者流露出詹姆斯·斯科特所说的梅蒂斯,流畅地跨越制度界限,试验农业生态创新,并提供他的空间作为参与式学习的灯塔。有趣的是,他不是博士,而是一名退休的邮政工人。随着城乡之间粮食安全进展的利害关系越来越大,农业生态灯塔为新的研究人员-农民伙伴关系开辟了潜力,也为扩大我们认为合法的知识制造社区提供了一种手段。我提出了“灯塔扩展模型”的概念,挑战了主流合作扩展的话语,认为一个更平等的食物系统可能会从那些传统上被排除在塑造它之外的人的参与中出现。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Review: Food Information, Communication and Education: Eating Knowledge, edited by Simona De Iulio and Susan Kovacs Food in Place What Rats Reveal about Cooking in Late Medieval Japan Being Butter Confronting Sustainability
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1