A Man of Maladies: Reexamining Lt. Gen. A. P. Hill’s Leadership Failures at Gettysburg and Beyond

Paul C. Jussel, George M. George, Daniel R. George, T. Crook
{"title":"A Man of Maladies: Reexamining Lt. Gen. A. P. Hill’s Leadership Failures at Gettysburg and Beyond","authors":"Paul C. Jussel, George M. George, Daniel R. George, T. Crook","doi":"10.1353/GET.2016.0014","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Gettysburg Magazine, no. 55 vided direction to his major subordinates— the two, then three, corps commanders. As others have documented, aft er Lee assumed command in 1862, it took some time for both Lt. Gen. James Longstreet and Lt. Gen. Th omas “Stonewall” Jackson to become accustomed to Lee’s style of broad guidance for action.1 With Jackson having fallen at Chancellorsville in May 1863, Lee faced the urgent challenge of fi nding a new corps commander— a decision that involved not only identifying whom to promote but also sensing how that person would learn and develop under Lee’s guidance. Th is article examines why Hill was chosen for this command and why his performance at Gettysburg may not have lived up to his formidable reputation. Hill was very much out of touch during this decisive battle; his presence— felt so profoundly in previous battles— was lacking in Pennsylvania. A careful manager as a division commander, he allowed his subordinates free rein and so little supervision that Lee himself had to discuss operations with the Th ird Corps division commanders. Finally, Hill’s development and progress as a corps commander, not only from his fi rst action at Gettysburg but also through the rest of the war, was spotty and lacking in vision. Perhaps there is more to the common story that Hill was simply “sick” during those opening days of July. Th is article examines Hill’s maladies and assesses their impact on his ability to command. In fact, Hill suff ered from a longterm series of illnesses that heavily infl uenced his physical and mental abilities to command. From","PeriodicalId":268075,"journal":{"name":"Gettysburg Magazine","volume":"20 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-07-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Gettysburg Magazine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1353/GET.2016.0014","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Gettysburg Magazine, no. 55 vided direction to his major subordinates— the two, then three, corps commanders. As others have documented, aft er Lee assumed command in 1862, it took some time for both Lt. Gen. James Longstreet and Lt. Gen. Th omas “Stonewall” Jackson to become accustomed to Lee’s style of broad guidance for action.1 With Jackson having fallen at Chancellorsville in May 1863, Lee faced the urgent challenge of fi nding a new corps commander— a decision that involved not only identifying whom to promote but also sensing how that person would learn and develop under Lee’s guidance. Th is article examines why Hill was chosen for this command and why his performance at Gettysburg may not have lived up to his formidable reputation. Hill was very much out of touch during this decisive battle; his presence— felt so profoundly in previous battles— was lacking in Pennsylvania. A careful manager as a division commander, he allowed his subordinates free rein and so little supervision that Lee himself had to discuss operations with the Th ird Corps division commanders. Finally, Hill’s development and progress as a corps commander, not only from his fi rst action at Gettysburg but also through the rest of the war, was spotty and lacking in vision. Perhaps there is more to the common story that Hill was simply “sick” during those opening days of July. Th is article examines Hill’s maladies and assesses their impact on his ability to command. In fact, Hill suff ered from a longterm series of illnesses that heavily infl uenced his physical and mental abilities to command. From
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
一个有病的人:重新审视a.p.希尔中将在葛底斯堡及以后的领导失败
葛底斯堡杂志,不。他向他的主要下属——先是两个,然后是三个军团指挥官——指示方向。正如其他人所记载的那样,在李将军1862年担任指挥官后,詹姆斯·朗斯特里特中将和托马斯·“石墙”杰克逊中将都花了一些时间来适应李将军的行动指导风格随着杰克逊于1863年5月在钱瑟勒斯维尔陷落,李面临着寻找新的军团指挥官的紧迫挑战——这一决定不仅涉及确定提拔谁,还涉及到这个人如何在李的指导下学习和发展。这篇文章探讨了为什么希尔被选为这个指挥官,以及为什么他在葛底斯堡的表现可能辜负了他令人敬畏的声誉。在这场决定性的战役中,希尔完全失去了联系;他的存在——在以前的战斗中如此深刻地感受到——在宾夕法尼亚州是缺乏的。作为师长,他是一个细心的管理者,他允许下属自由发挥,很少监督,以至于李自己不得不与第3兵团的师长讨论行动。最后,希尔作为一名军团指挥官的发展和进步,不仅从他在葛底斯堡的第一次行动开始,而且在战争的其余时间里,都是参差不齐的,缺乏远见。也许还有更多的故事,希尔只是“生病”在7月开始的那些日子里。这篇文章研究了希尔的疾病,并评估了这些疾病对他指挥能力的影响。事实上,希尔长期遭受一系列疾病的折磨,严重影响了他的身体和精神指挥能力。从
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Serving the Guns in Thompson's Battery Emilie Davis's Diary and the Importance of the Gettysburg Campaign Stories the Monuments Tell: The First Corps on July 1 Doctors for Hire at the Battle of Gettysburg Of Cupolas and Sharpshooters: Major General John Fulton Reynolds and Popular Gettysburg Myths
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1