Strengthening the Rule of Law and Good Governance amid COVID-19 Pandemic in the Global South

J. Olorunfemi, Chidiebere Udeokechukwu
{"title":"Strengthening the Rule of Law and Good Governance amid COVID-19 Pandemic in the Global South","authors":"J. Olorunfemi, Chidiebere Udeokechukwu","doi":"10.56284/tnjr.v16i1.19","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Disproportionate curtailment measures against the COVID-19 pandemic alongside compulsory vaccination (in the midst of rumours and conspiracy theories) have contributed to vaccination hesitancy, data and surveillance monitoring without due regard to civil and political rights. The absence of due regard to these rights by governments, undermine the observance of rule of law and good governance. Consequently, there have been sweeping implications on public order and security, disruption of electoral process and the right to dignity through torture and unlawful use of force. Socio-economic rights violations, relaxation of public procurement mechanisms, lack of capacity to deliver essential services, disinformation, perversion of justice, and gender-based violence have also overwhelmed the entire global health care system. The paper assesses curtailment measures against COVID-19 pandemic and its impact on rule of law and good governance in the Global South towards a better COVID-19 stimulus and recovery packages. It adopts doctrinal research method by relying on relevant statutes, international instruments, judicial decisions and literature. It finds that the discriminatory, inequitable curtailment measures and insufficient governmental social protections and economic supports, constitute “multiplier threat” that produces structural violence against vulnerable, marginalised communities and foreign nationals. The pandemic has created scientific uncertainty that necessitates global solidarity and scientific precautionary measures through digital and telemedicine leading to important health management. The paper calls for international democracy support for electoral reforms and United Nations oversight mechanisms for rule of law and good governance to promote transparency and accountability in the management of COVID-19 pandemic.","PeriodicalId":326636,"journal":{"name":"The Nigerian Juridical Review","volume":"4 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Nigerian Juridical Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.56284/tnjr.v16i1.19","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Disproportionate curtailment measures against the COVID-19 pandemic alongside compulsory vaccination (in the midst of rumours and conspiracy theories) have contributed to vaccination hesitancy, data and surveillance monitoring without due regard to civil and political rights. The absence of due regard to these rights by governments, undermine the observance of rule of law and good governance. Consequently, there have been sweeping implications on public order and security, disruption of electoral process and the right to dignity through torture and unlawful use of force. Socio-economic rights violations, relaxation of public procurement mechanisms, lack of capacity to deliver essential services, disinformation, perversion of justice, and gender-based violence have also overwhelmed the entire global health care system. The paper assesses curtailment measures against COVID-19 pandemic and its impact on rule of law and good governance in the Global South towards a better COVID-19 stimulus and recovery packages. It adopts doctrinal research method by relying on relevant statutes, international instruments, judicial decisions and literature. It finds that the discriminatory, inequitable curtailment measures and insufficient governmental social protections and economic supports, constitute “multiplier threat” that produces structural violence against vulnerable, marginalised communities and foreign nationals. The pandemic has created scientific uncertainty that necessitates global solidarity and scientific precautionary measures through digital and telemedicine leading to important health management. The paper calls for international democracy support for electoral reforms and United Nations oversight mechanisms for rule of law and good governance to promote transparency and accountability in the management of COVID-19 pandemic.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
在COVID-19大流行期间加强法治和善治
针对COVID-19大流行的过度削减措施以及强制疫苗接种(在谣言和阴谋论中)导致了疫苗接种的犹豫,数据和监测监测没有适当考虑公民和政治权利。政府不适当考虑这些权利,就会破坏对法治和善治的遵守。因此,酷刑和非法使用武力对公共秩序和安全产生了广泛的影响,扰乱了选举进程和尊严的权利。侵犯社会经济权利、放松公共采购机制、缺乏提供基本服务的能力、虚假信息、司法不公和基于性别的暴力也使整个全球卫生保健系统不堪重负。本文评估了应对COVID-19大流行的削减措施及其对全球南方国家法治和善治的影响,以更好地制定COVID-19刺激和复苏一揽子计划。采用理论研究方法,以相关法规、国际文书、司法判决和文献为依据。报告认为,歧视性、不公平的削减措施以及政府社会保护和经济支持不足构成“乘数威胁”,对脆弱、边缘化社区和外国人产生结构性暴力。大流行造成了科学上的不确定性,需要全球团结一致,采取科学的预防措施,通过数字和远程医疗进行重要的卫生管理。该文件呼吁国际民主支持选举改革和联合国法治和善治监督机制,以提高COVID-19大流行管理的透明度和问责制。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Impact of Climate Change Regime in Maintaining Internal Security in Nigeria Dysfunctional Nigerian Insurance Industry: Failure of Law or Regulation? Protection of Traditional Knowledge and its Relevance to National Economic Growth and Development in Nigeria Primary Health Care Approach to Achieving Universal Health Coverage in Nigeria: Are Extant Legal and Policy Regimes Adequate? Impact of the Public Procurement Act 2007 on the Functions of Governing Councils of Federal Universities in Nigeria
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1