Virtual Button and Graphical Interface System Safety Evaluation using System Theoretic Process Analysis (STPA)

Jesse Johnston, Mark A. Vernacchia
{"title":"Virtual Button and Graphical Interface System Safety Evaluation using System Theoretic Process Analysis (STPA)","authors":"Jesse Johnston, Mark A. Vernacchia","doi":"10.56094/jss.v56i2.21","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"System Theoretic Process Analysis (STPA) is an extremely valuable methodology, especially when used early in a system’s concept phase, for effective and efficient development of safety requirements that address potential safety issues associated with human machine interactions. \nThis paper outlines how STPA can be used to explore potential safety concerns associated with interactions between human operators and virtual buttons within graphical interfaces across the planned operational scenarios and expected system behaviors. Appropriately validated system safety requirements can be developed based on this exploratory effort. \nThe paper shows how STPA includes drivers and operators as system elements within the control structure where these humans are expected to interact with a “system/feature of interest” by means of virtual buttons presented in a graphical interface. The inclusion of humans as elements of the control structure enables a representation of the human as a “human controller” and, as such, enables STPA evaluation techniques to be applied to them just as these techniques would be applied to any “control” element in a control structure.","PeriodicalId":250838,"journal":{"name":"Journal of System Safety","volume":"29 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of System Safety","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.56094/jss.v56i2.21","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

System Theoretic Process Analysis (STPA) is an extremely valuable methodology, especially when used early in a system’s concept phase, for effective and efficient development of safety requirements that address potential safety issues associated with human machine interactions. This paper outlines how STPA can be used to explore potential safety concerns associated with interactions between human operators and virtual buttons within graphical interfaces across the planned operational scenarios and expected system behaviors. Appropriately validated system safety requirements can be developed based on this exploratory effort. The paper shows how STPA includes drivers and operators as system elements within the control structure where these humans are expected to interact with a “system/feature of interest” by means of virtual buttons presented in a graphical interface. The inclusion of humans as elements of the control structure enables a representation of the human as a “human controller” and, as such, enables STPA evaluation techniques to be applied to them just as these techniques would be applied to any “control” element in a control structure.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
基于系统理论过程分析(STPA)的虚拟按钮与图形界面系统安全性评价
系统理论过程分析(STPA)是一种非常有价值的方法,特别是在系统概念阶段的早期使用时,可以有效和高效地开发安全需求,解决与人机交互相关的潜在安全问题。本文概述了如何使用STPA来探索与跨计划操作场景和预期系统行为的图形界面中的人类操作员和虚拟按钮之间的交互相关的潜在安全问题。适当验证的系统安全需求可以在此探索性工作的基础上开发出来。本文展示了STPA如何将驾驶员和操作员作为控制结构中的系统元素,这些人将通过图形界面中的虚拟按钮与“感兴趣的系统/特征”进行交互。将人作为控制结构的元素包含进来,可以将人表示为“人类控制器”,因此,可以将STPA评估技术应用于他们,就像这些技术将应用于控制结构中的任何“控制”元素一样。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Proposing the Use of Hazard Analysis for Machine Learning Data Sets Review of the Latest Developments in Automotive Safety Standardization for Driving Automation Systems Human Reliability Analysis using a Human Factors Hazard Model Incremental Assurance Through Eliminative Argumentation System Safety Bookshelf
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1