Neonatal Transient Evoked Otoacoustic Emissions Screening: How Many Stimuli Are Enough?

L. Cropper, J. Kei, V. Smyth, M. Maurer, June Young, D. Tudehope, B. McPherson
{"title":"Neonatal Transient Evoked Otoacoustic Emissions Screening: How Many Stimuli Are Enough?","authors":"L. Cropper, J. Kei, V. Smyth, M. Maurer, June Young, D. Tudehope, B. McPherson","doi":"10.1375/AUDI.24.1.49.31114","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The present study examined the effect of stimulus number on two pass criteria in neonatal transient evoked otoacoustic emission (TEOAE) screening. Participants were 25 normal, full-term neonates (mean age = 2.7 days, SD = 1.3), with normal peripheral auditory function in both ears. The Otodynamics ILO88 (Quickscreen) program was used and the TEOAE spectrum was analysed after the presentation of 10, 50, 100 and 260 stimuli. Two pass criteria were used: Criterion 1 - whole wave reproducibility (WWR) ≥ 60%, and Criterion 2 - SNR ≥ 3 dB for all three frequency bands centered at 2.4, 3.2 and 4.0 kHz. The results revealed that the number of stimuli used to achieve a \"Pass\" status depended on the pass criterion and the activity state of neonates. Although the use of an initial minimum stimulus number of 50 in neonatal TEOAE screening is justified, clinicians should continue testing if necessary until a set of predetermined stopping criteria are satisfied.","PeriodicalId":114768,"journal":{"name":"Australian and New Zealand Journal of Audiology","volume":"27 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2002-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Australian and New Zealand Journal of Audiology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1375/AUDI.24.1.49.31114","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

The present study examined the effect of stimulus number on two pass criteria in neonatal transient evoked otoacoustic emission (TEOAE) screening. Participants were 25 normal, full-term neonates (mean age = 2.7 days, SD = 1.3), with normal peripheral auditory function in both ears. The Otodynamics ILO88 (Quickscreen) program was used and the TEOAE spectrum was analysed after the presentation of 10, 50, 100 and 260 stimuli. Two pass criteria were used: Criterion 1 - whole wave reproducibility (WWR) ≥ 60%, and Criterion 2 - SNR ≥ 3 dB for all three frequency bands centered at 2.4, 3.2 and 4.0 kHz. The results revealed that the number of stimuli used to achieve a "Pass" status depended on the pass criterion and the activity state of neonates. Although the use of an initial minimum stimulus number of 50 in neonatal TEOAE screening is justified, clinicians should continue testing if necessary until a set of predetermined stopping criteria are satisfied.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
新生儿瞬态诱发耳声发射筛查:多少刺激才足够?
本研究探讨了刺激数对新生儿瞬态诱发耳声发射(TEOAE)筛查两项通过标准的影响。参与者为25名正常的足月新生儿(平均年龄2.7天,SD = 1.3),双耳外周听觉功能正常。使用Otodynamics ILO88 (Quickscreen)程序,分析10、50、100和260个刺激后的TEOAE谱。采用两个通过标准:标准1 -全波重现性(WWR)≥60%,标准2 -信噪比≥3db,所有三个频带均以2.4,3.2和4.0 kHz为中心。结果显示,达到“通过”状态的刺激数量取决于通过标准和新生儿的活动状态。虽然在新生儿TEOAE筛查中使用初始最小刺激数为50是合理的,但如果有必要,临床医生应该继续测试,直到满足一组预先确定的停止标准。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Rehabilitation Efforts and Stress in Parents of Children With Cochlear Implants Communicating with Australian Deaf People about Communication Technology Student Audiologists' Impressions of a Simulation Training Program An Independent Review of Neuromonics Tinnitus Treatment Controlled Clinical Trials A Pilot Investigation into the Provision of Hearing Services Using Tele-audiology to Remote Areas
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1