EUTHANASIA REVIEW FROM APPLICABLE CRIMINAL LAW IN INDONESIA (Case Study Medan District Court)

Mega, Nelvitia Purba
{"title":"EUTHANASIA REVIEW FROM APPLICABLE CRIMINAL LAW IN INDONESIA (Case Study Medan District Court)","authors":"Mega, Nelvitia Purba","doi":"10.58471/justi.v13i1.368","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Apart from technological advances that have many positive effects, it's just that for some people think that these advances have negative effects as well. The negative influence in question is the human thought of a death. The negative influence of technological advances in health science causes the family of a patient or the patient himself to apply to medical personnel or doctors to hasten the death of a patient in order to relieve pain so that the patient can rest in peace and this is what we call euthanasia. In line with the title of this research, namely \"Euthanasia Judging from the Criminal Law Applicable in Indonesia\". The problems that will be discussed in this research are How is the application of the law related to euthanasia in the perspective of criminal law? What are the factors that cause someone to apply for euthanasia? What is the medical legal responsibility regarding medical officers (doctors) who perform euthanasia? This research approach uses normative juridical law research methods. This study uses primary data and tertiary data and data analysis in this study uses qualitative analysis. This study shows that the legal basis used for regulating euthanasia in positive law in Indonesia is Article 344 of the Criminal Code, and the factors that apply to euthanasia are generally severe illness with low life expectancy, frustration factors and economic or financial factors.","PeriodicalId":351142,"journal":{"name":"Fox Justi : Jurnal Ilmu Hukum","volume":"23 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-07-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Fox Justi : Jurnal Ilmu Hukum","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.58471/justi.v13i1.368","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Apart from technological advances that have many positive effects, it's just that for some people think that these advances have negative effects as well. The negative influence in question is the human thought of a death. The negative influence of technological advances in health science causes the family of a patient or the patient himself to apply to medical personnel or doctors to hasten the death of a patient in order to relieve pain so that the patient can rest in peace and this is what we call euthanasia. In line with the title of this research, namely "Euthanasia Judging from the Criminal Law Applicable in Indonesia". The problems that will be discussed in this research are How is the application of the law related to euthanasia in the perspective of criminal law? What are the factors that cause someone to apply for euthanasia? What is the medical legal responsibility regarding medical officers (doctors) who perform euthanasia? This research approach uses normative juridical law research methods. This study uses primary data and tertiary data and data analysis in this study uses qualitative analysis. This study shows that the legal basis used for regulating euthanasia in positive law in Indonesia is Article 344 of the Criminal Code, and the factors that apply to euthanasia are generally severe illness with low life expectancy, frustration factors and economic or financial factors.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
从印尼适用刑法看安乐死(以棉兰地方法院为例)
除了技术进步有许多积极影响外,有些人认为这些进步也有负面影响。这里所说的负面影响是人类对死亡的思考。健康科学技术进步的负面影响导致病人的家属或病人自己向医务人员或医生申请加速病人的死亡,以减轻痛苦,使病人可以安息,这就是我们所说的安乐死。符合本研究的题目,即“从印尼刑法适用情况看安乐死”。本研究将讨论的问题是:在刑法的视角下,与安乐死相关的法律如何适用?是什么因素导致人们申请安乐死?实施安乐死的医务人员(医生)的医疗法律责任是什么?本研究方法采用规范的司法法学研究方法。本研究采用一手数据和三级数据,本研究的数据分析采用定性分析。本研究表明,印度尼西亚实在法中规范安乐死的法律依据是刑法第344条,适用于安乐死的因素一般是预期寿命较低的严重疾病、挫折因素和经济或金融因素。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Political Parties In The Indonesian Political System After The Rolling Of Reforms JURIDICAL REVIEW ON HUMAN TRAFFICKING CRIMINAL ACTS (Decision Number : 801/Pid.Sus/2020/PN Lbp) SETTLEMENT OF CIVIL DISPUTES BETWEEN CUSTOMERS WITH BANK THROUGH BANKING MEDIATION (Case Study of Bank Al Washliyah Medan) REVIEW OF COVID-19 TASK CIRCULAR LETTER NUMBER 20 YEAR 2021 ON MANDATORY QUARANTINE POLICY AFTER TAKING INTERNATIONAL TRAVEL DURING THE COVID-19 PANDEMIC IN HUMAN RIGHTS PERSPECTIVE (STUDY ON TRAVEL HUB HOTEL) JUDGES' CONSIDERATIONS IN DECIDING CRIMINAL ACTS OF CLASS 1 ARCOTIC ABUSE FOR YOURSELF (CASE STUDY Number 1/Pid.Sus-Anak/2019/PN Lbp PN LUBUK PAKAM)
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1