Development of a Transfusion-Indication Data-Entry Program and Analysis of Transfusion Indications at a University Hospital in Korea

W. Shin, Jeong Jae Lee, Haran Chung, J. Shin
{"title":"Development of a Transfusion-Indication Data-Entry Program and Analysis of Transfusion Indications at a University Hospital in Korea","authors":"W. Shin, Jeong Jae Lee, Haran Chung, J. Shin","doi":"10.17945/kjbt.2019.30.2.138","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Transfusion guidelines are not only essential for the optimal use of blood products, but also help reduce transfusion-related adverse reactions and improve patients’ outcomes. In this hospital, a transfusion-indication data-entry program based on the national transfusion guidelines was developed and applied to the electronic medical record system in 2016. All transfusion orders, except for emergencies, have been performed using this program since then. This study analyzed the reasons for the transfusion to monitor the blood product usage and provide feedback to clinicians. Methods: The transfusion-indications were classified by the blood product and a pop-up window listing these indications was produced. The indications were as follows: red blood cells (RBCs) - acute blood loss, chronic anemia, surgery/procedure, transplantation and ‘other’; platelets (PLTs) - active bleeding, bleeding prophylaxis, surgery/procedure, massive transfusion, and ‘other’; fresh frozen plasma (FFP) - bleeding in coagulopathy, bleeding prophylaxis in coagulopathy, massive transfusion, plasma exchange, and ‘other’. The indications entered into the data-entry program from Sep 2016 to Feb 2018 were analyzed. Results: The most common indications for transfusion were chronic anemia for RBCs (7977/16138, 49.4%), bleeding prophylaxis for PLTs (5726/11158, 51.3%), and ‘other’ for FFP (2180/6024, 36.2%). Many clinicians entered the transfusion indication as ‘other’, but the free-text supplied by the clinician when ‘other’ was selected, often corresponded to an indication already categorized in the transfusion-indication data-entry program. Conclusion: Feedback and training on the data of transfusion indications are needed for clinicians to properly use blood products by operating the transfusion-indication data-entry program more efficiently. (Korean J Blood Transfus 2019;30:138-147)","PeriodicalId":231122,"journal":{"name":"The Korean Journal of Blood Transfusion","volume":"74 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-08-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Korean Journal of Blood Transfusion","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17945/kjbt.2019.30.2.138","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Background: Transfusion guidelines are not only essential for the optimal use of blood products, but also help reduce transfusion-related adverse reactions and improve patients’ outcomes. In this hospital, a transfusion-indication data-entry program based on the national transfusion guidelines was developed and applied to the electronic medical record system in 2016. All transfusion orders, except for emergencies, have been performed using this program since then. This study analyzed the reasons for the transfusion to monitor the blood product usage and provide feedback to clinicians. Methods: The transfusion-indications were classified by the blood product and a pop-up window listing these indications was produced. The indications were as follows: red blood cells (RBCs) - acute blood loss, chronic anemia, surgery/procedure, transplantation and ‘other’; platelets (PLTs) - active bleeding, bleeding prophylaxis, surgery/procedure, massive transfusion, and ‘other’; fresh frozen plasma (FFP) - bleeding in coagulopathy, bleeding prophylaxis in coagulopathy, massive transfusion, plasma exchange, and ‘other’. The indications entered into the data-entry program from Sep 2016 to Feb 2018 were analyzed. Results: The most common indications for transfusion were chronic anemia for RBCs (7977/16138, 49.4%), bleeding prophylaxis for PLTs (5726/11158, 51.3%), and ‘other’ for FFP (2180/6024, 36.2%). Many clinicians entered the transfusion indication as ‘other’, but the free-text supplied by the clinician when ‘other’ was selected, often corresponded to an indication already categorized in the transfusion-indication data-entry program. Conclusion: Feedback and training on the data of transfusion indications are needed for clinicians to properly use blood products by operating the transfusion-indication data-entry program more efficiently. (Korean J Blood Transfus 2019;30:138-147)
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
韩国某大学医院输血指征数据录入程序的开发和输血指征分析
背景:输血指南不仅对血液制品的最佳使用至关重要,而且有助于减少输血相关的不良反应并改善患者的预后。该院根据国家输血指南制定了输血指征数据录入程序,并于2016年应用于电子病历系统。从那时起,除紧急情况外,所有输血订单都使用该程序执行。本研究分析输血原因,监测血液制品使用情况,并向临床医生提供反馈。方法:按血液制品对输血指征进行分类,并以弹出式窗口列出输血指征。适应症如下:红细胞(rbc) -急性失血,慢性贫血,手术/程序,移植和“其他”;血小板——活动性出血、出血预防、手术/程序、大量输血和“其他”;新鲜冷冻血浆(FFP) -凝血功能障碍出血、凝血功能障碍出血预防、大量输血、血浆置换和“其他”。对2016年9月至2018年2月录入数据的适应症进行分析。结果:输血最常见的指征是红细胞慢性贫血(7977/16138,49.4%)、血小板预防出血(5726/11158,51.3%)和FFP“其他”(2180/6024,36.2%)。许多临床医生将输血指征输入为“其他”,但当选择“其他”时,临床医生提供的自由文本通常与输血指征数据输入程序中已经分类的指征相对应。结论:需要对输血指征数据进行反馈和培训,以便临床医生更有效地操作输血指征数据录入程序,正确使用血液制品。(大韩输血杂志2019;30:138-147)
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Changes in the Korean Journal of Blood Transfusion over Three Years (2021 to 2023) Unexpected Antibody Identification Experienced by a Referral Laboratory for Medical Testing Daratumumab-Induced Interference in Flow-Cytometry Crossmatch and Resolving It by DTT Treatment Comparison of Unexpected Antibody Frequency in Korea by Department: Focusing on Obstetrics and Infertility Centers Suggestion to Use Optimal ABO Non-Identical but Compatible RBC Components in Emergency/Massive Transfusions: Are Type O RBC the Second Best for Type AB Patients?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1