{"title":"Critical Approach to History Textbook Images","authors":"P. Bharath","doi":"10.29173/assert43","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The use of textbooks as critical learning and teaching resources is reinforced in South Africa by the Department of Education’s Revised Annual Teaching Plans for Social Sciences, Term One. In Week One of Grade 6, the 2021 plan states that each learner must receive a Social Studies textbook and be taught the importance of taking care of them (DoE, 2021, p. 1), reinforcing the status of the textbook as an authority on history content and learning. Consequently, research into history textbooks is important. This study produced data about some textbook images which could potentially challenge learner’s ability to construct historical narratives and to think historically. This challenge lies in the way in which these images are used as they form part of the repertoire of historical evidence. Through different time periods we have seen how images and photographs have recorded the past. While images are used to assist leaners understand the past, not all the images are historical evidence. Some are presented as real but are actually drawings of an event, artefact or person. Textbook authors do not distinguish clearly between what is real or not, with some scenes ‘staged’ to create a sense of reality for understanding. The general audience or readership may be under the impression that all the contents of a history textbook are authentic but there should be an awareness of these tendencies. Teachers then know how to move learners when the images are unclear or unsupported in their contexts. Proper captioning and provenance is strongly recommended so that images which are evidence can be classified as historical sources and not just generic representations of the past. ","PeriodicalId":410382,"journal":{"name":"Annals of Social Studies Education Research for Teachers","volume":"12 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-08-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of Social Studies Education Research for Teachers","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.29173/assert43","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
The use of textbooks as critical learning and teaching resources is reinforced in South Africa by the Department of Education’s Revised Annual Teaching Plans for Social Sciences, Term One. In Week One of Grade 6, the 2021 plan states that each learner must receive a Social Studies textbook and be taught the importance of taking care of them (DoE, 2021, p. 1), reinforcing the status of the textbook as an authority on history content and learning. Consequently, research into history textbooks is important. This study produced data about some textbook images which could potentially challenge learner’s ability to construct historical narratives and to think historically. This challenge lies in the way in which these images are used as they form part of the repertoire of historical evidence. Through different time periods we have seen how images and photographs have recorded the past. While images are used to assist leaners understand the past, not all the images are historical evidence. Some are presented as real but are actually drawings of an event, artefact or person. Textbook authors do not distinguish clearly between what is real or not, with some scenes ‘staged’ to create a sense of reality for understanding. The general audience or readership may be under the impression that all the contents of a history textbook are authentic but there should be an awareness of these tendencies. Teachers then know how to move learners when the images are unclear or unsupported in their contexts. Proper captioning and provenance is strongly recommended so that images which are evidence can be classified as historical sources and not just generic representations of the past.
南非教育部修订的第一学期社会科学年度教学计划加强了教科书作为关键学习和教学资源的使用。在六年级的第一周,2021年计划规定,每个学习者都必须收到一本社会研究教科书,并被教导照顾它们的重要性(DoE, 2021, p. 1),加强了教科书作为历史内容和学习权威的地位。因此,对历史教科书的研究非常重要。这项研究提供了一些教科书图像的数据,这些图像可能会挑战学习者构建历史叙事和历史思考的能力。这一挑战在于这些图像的使用方式,因为它们构成了历史证据的一部分。通过不同的时期,我们看到了图像和照片是如何记录过去的。虽然图像被用来帮助学习者理解过去,但并非所有图像都是历史证据。有些是真实的,但实际上是一个事件,人工制品或人的图纸。教科书的作者并没有明确区分什么是真实的,什么是虚假的,有些场景是“上演”的,以创造一种真实感,以便理解。一般观众或读者可能会认为历史教科书的内容都是真实的,但应该意识到这些倾向。这样,教师就知道如何在图像不清晰或上下文不支持的情况下打动学习者。强烈建议适当的说明文字和出处,这样作为证据的图像就可以归类为历史来源,而不仅仅是过去的一般表现。