Key challenges for patient registries – A report from the 1st workshop of the EHC Think Tank Workstream on Registries

A. Bok, D. Noone, Naja Skouw-Rasmussen, Ehc Think Tank
{"title":"Key challenges for patient registries – A report from the 1st workshop of the EHC Think Tank Workstream on Registries","authors":"A. Bok, D. Noone, Naja Skouw-Rasmussen, Ehc Think Tank","doi":"10.2478/jhp-2022-0002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Introduction Patient registries are an invaluable resource for furthering the understanding of rare diseases such as bleeding disorders, providing large, pooled datasets not achievable by other means of data collection. As well as supporting clinical care and research, registries must also be able to answer questions that are important to the wider bleeding disorders community. However, there are challenges associated with the need for secure access, exchange of health data, quality and interoperability, and data delivery. Identifying key challenges As part of the EHC Think Tank Patient Registries Workstream, 17 stakeholders representing health care providers, patient groups, research and industry met in October 2021 to identify challenges to managing and utilising patient registries, from each of their stakeholder perspectives. This is a first step in a longer term process aiming to identify or co-create solutions that could improve access and interpretation of patient data. The challenges identified relate to five key categories which are interlinked in various ways: 1. The multiplicity of registries and datasets; 2. Data quality; 3. Data sharing; 4. Expanding the scope of registries; 5. The role of the patient in registries. Summary The heterogeneity in the way that registries are designed, funded and owned, the type of data collected, and the way data is collected are issues that must be addressed. Good, quality data is needed at all levels to ensure the provision and funding of effective care. Data quality will increase overall if it is possible to merge data from different registries. The value of patient participation in registries must also be acknowledged and built on to help ensure their quality, that they remain fit for purpose, and that data input is sustained over time.","PeriodicalId":372940,"journal":{"name":"The Journal of Haemophilia Practice","volume":"18 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Journal of Haemophilia Practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2478/jhp-2022-0002","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract Introduction Patient registries are an invaluable resource for furthering the understanding of rare diseases such as bleeding disorders, providing large, pooled datasets not achievable by other means of data collection. As well as supporting clinical care and research, registries must also be able to answer questions that are important to the wider bleeding disorders community. However, there are challenges associated with the need for secure access, exchange of health data, quality and interoperability, and data delivery. Identifying key challenges As part of the EHC Think Tank Patient Registries Workstream, 17 stakeholders representing health care providers, patient groups, research and industry met in October 2021 to identify challenges to managing and utilising patient registries, from each of their stakeholder perspectives. This is a first step in a longer term process aiming to identify or co-create solutions that could improve access and interpretation of patient data. The challenges identified relate to five key categories which are interlinked in various ways: 1. The multiplicity of registries and datasets; 2. Data quality; 3. Data sharing; 4. Expanding the scope of registries; 5. The role of the patient in registries. Summary The heterogeneity in the way that registries are designed, funded and owned, the type of data collected, and the way data is collected are issues that must be addressed. Good, quality data is needed at all levels to ensure the provision and funding of effective care. Data quality will increase overall if it is possible to merge data from different registries. The value of patient participation in registries must also be acknowledged and built on to help ensure their quality, that they remain fit for purpose, and that data input is sustained over time.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
患者登记面临的主要挑战——EHC智库登记工作流程第一次研讨会报告
患者登记是进一步了解罕见疾病(如出血性疾病)的宝贵资源,提供了其他数据收集方式无法实现的大型汇总数据集。除了支持临床护理和研究外,登记还必须能够回答对更广泛的出血性疾病社区很重要的问题。然而,在安全访问、卫生数据交换、质量和互操作性以及数据交付等方面存在着挑战。作为EHC智库患者登记工作流程的一部分,代表医疗保健提供者、患者群体、研究和行业的17个利益相关者于2021年10月举行会议,从每个利益相关者的角度确定管理和利用患者登记的挑战。这是一个长期过程的第一步,旨在确定或共同创造可以改善患者数据访问和解释的解决方案。所确定的挑战涉及以各种方式相互联系的五个关键类别:注册表和数据集的多样性;2. 数据质量;3.数据共享;4. 扩大登记处的范围;5. 病人在登记处的角色。注册中心的设计、资助和拥有方式的异质性、收集数据的类型以及收集数据的方式都是必须解决的问题。各级都需要良好、高质量的数据,以确保提供有效护理并为其提供资金。如果可以合并来自不同注册表的数据,数据质量将总体上得到提高。患者参与登记的价值也必须得到承认,并以此为基础,以帮助确保其质量,确保其符合目的,并确保数据输入能够长期持续。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Living, Caring, Learning – The treatment centre as family for a woman with severe haemophilia Living, Caring, Learning – Reflections on the therapeutic relationship in haemophilia care Future Care Pathways – A report from the 1st workshop of the EHC Think Tank Workstream on Future Care Pathways The impact of the Contaminated Blood Scandal on the next generation: the state of the evidence Editorial – Living, Caring, Learning: How patients shape the specialist haemophilia nurse
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1