Gender Differences in Managerial Aspirations and Potential Among Physical Education and Non-Physical Education Students

Beth Steel, P. Chelladurai, B. Brown
{"title":"Gender Differences in Managerial Aspirations and Potential Among Physical Education and Non-Physical Education Students","authors":"Beth Steel, P. Chelladurai, B. Brown","doi":"10.1123/JSP.9.2.118","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Gender differences in managerial aspirations and managerial potential have been advanced as possible explanations for the structuring of organizations along gender lines, with women concentrated in lower level jobs and under-represented in managerial positions. These hypothesized gender differences were examined in a sample of male and female physical education and non-physical education students. Analysis of variance results showed that the effects of gender, faculty, or their interaction on managerial aspirations were not significant. The main effects of aspiration level, faculty, and gender on the set of managerial potential variables were significant. Aspirants scored higher than nonaspirants on self-assurance, decisiveness, and need for dominance. Non-physical education students scored higher on need for dominance than did physical education students. Males were higher in need for autonomy and need for dominance, while females were higher in decisiveness.","PeriodicalId":442839,"journal":{"name":"The Journal of Sport Psychology","volume":"8 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1987-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"7","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Journal of Sport Psychology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1123/JSP.9.2.118","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 7

Abstract

Gender differences in managerial aspirations and managerial potential have been advanced as possible explanations for the structuring of organizations along gender lines, with women concentrated in lower level jobs and under-represented in managerial positions. These hypothesized gender differences were examined in a sample of male and female physical education and non-physical education students. Analysis of variance results showed that the effects of gender, faculty, or their interaction on managerial aspirations were not significant. The main effects of aspiration level, faculty, and gender on the set of managerial potential variables were significant. Aspirants scored higher than nonaspirants on self-assurance, decisiveness, and need for dominance. Non-physical education students scored higher on need for dominance than did physical education students. Males were higher in need for autonomy and need for dominance, while females were higher in decisiveness.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
体育与非体育学生管理愿望与潜力的性别差异
人们提出了管理愿望和管理潜力方面的性别差异,作为按性别划分组织结构的可能解释,因为妇女集中在较低级别的工作中,担任管理职位的人数不足。这些假设的性别差异在男女体育和非体育学生的样本中进行了检验。方差分析结果表明,性别、教师或他们的相互作用对管理愿望的影响不显著。期望水平、教师和性别对管理潜在变量集的主要影响是显著的。上进心强的人在自信、决断力和支配欲方面的得分高于非上进心强的人。非体育专业学生的支配需求得分高于体育专业学生。男性对自主性和支配性的需求更高,而女性对决断性的需求更高。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The Effects of Visual Occlusion Training and Visual Allowance Training on Perceptual Distance and Actual Performance Distance of Golf Putting Conceptualizing the Construct of Athletic Identity in Korean Elite Athletes The Effects of the ACT-based Career Group Counseling Program for Retired Athletes in Their Teens A Study on Self-controlled Learning in Practice Conditions of Faded and Increased Feedback The Effect of Contextual Interference in Attentional Focus on Learning of Badminton High-Clear
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1