Rewarding Practice: An Alternative Grading System

Frederick T. Bail
{"title":"Rewarding Practice: An Alternative Grading System","authors":"Frederick T. Bail","doi":"10.1080/00193089.1983.10533811","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"My first professional teaching responsibility was an introductory statistics class and I wanted to demonstrate my competence as a teacher. However, a majority of the students had a strong fear of this un familiar, required course and had postponed it until the end of their undergraduate program. Thus they typical ly would not attempt even the simplest statistical prob lems voluntarily. Extensive practice was essential for them accurately to assess and develop their skills. Forc ing such practice through graded homework and quizzes heightened their anxiety without significantly improving performance or willingness to practice. My solution to this problem was to award a grade merely for practicing skills, independent of the quality of that practice. I constructed several problem sets. I awarded full credit to students who submitted answers to all of the questions on a problem set and, later, dis cussed their answers within a randomly assigned three person group. After the small group discussions, I pro vided correct answers and responded to questions. Stu dent reaction to this system was extremely positive. They began to attempt new problems, ask for additional problem sets, and volunteer more often in class. In short, both their skills and their confidence improved dramatically. Most students performed quite well on the final exam, which was graded on the quality of their performance. Subsequent experiences with similar systems in other classes have been uniformly positive. As a result, I have modified my grading systems to reorient students toward activities more conducive to","PeriodicalId":126898,"journal":{"name":"Improving College and University Teaching","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1983-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Improving College and University Teaching","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/00193089.1983.10533811","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

My first professional teaching responsibility was an introductory statistics class and I wanted to demonstrate my competence as a teacher. However, a majority of the students had a strong fear of this un familiar, required course and had postponed it until the end of their undergraduate program. Thus they typical ly would not attempt even the simplest statistical prob lems voluntarily. Extensive practice was essential for them accurately to assess and develop their skills. Forc ing such practice through graded homework and quizzes heightened their anxiety without significantly improving performance or willingness to practice. My solution to this problem was to award a grade merely for practicing skills, independent of the quality of that practice. I constructed several problem sets. I awarded full credit to students who submitted answers to all of the questions on a problem set and, later, dis cussed their answers within a randomly assigned three person group. After the small group discussions, I pro vided correct answers and responded to questions. Stu dent reaction to this system was extremely positive. They began to attempt new problems, ask for additional problem sets, and volunteer more often in class. In short, both their skills and their confidence improved dramatically. Most students performed quite well on the final exam, which was graded on the quality of their performance. Subsequent experiences with similar systems in other classes have been uniformly positive. As a result, I have modified my grading systems to reorient students toward activities more conducive to
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
奖励实践:另一种评分系统
我的第一个专业教学职责是统计学入门课,我想证明我作为一名教师的能力。然而,大多数学生对这门不熟悉的必修课有强烈的恐惧,并将其推迟到本科课程结束时。因此,即使是最简单的统计问题,他们通常也不会自愿尝试。广泛的练习对他们准确地评估和发展他们的技能是必不可少的。通过分级作业和测验来强迫他们进行这种练习,只会加剧他们的焦虑,而不会显著提高他们的表现或练习的意愿。我对这个问题的解决办法是,仅仅根据练习技巧来打分,而不考虑练习的质量。我做了几个习题。如果学生在一个问题集中提交了所有问题的答案,然后在一个随机分配的三人小组中讨论他们的答案,我就会给他们打满分。在小组讨论之后,我给出了正确的答案并回答了问题。学生对这个系统的反应非常积极。他们开始尝试新的问题,要求额外的问题集,并在课堂上更频繁地自愿。简而言之,他们的技能和信心都有了显著提高。大多数学生在期末考试中表现相当好,这是根据他们的表现质量来评分的。随后在其他班级使用类似系统的经验一致是积极的。因此,我修改了我的评分系统,以重新引导学生参加更有利于学习的活动
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Accommodating the Remedial Student in the Content Class Teaching Political Theory: Meaning through Metaphor Responding to Students: Ughs, Awks, and Ahas Responding to Industry: Writing in a High Tech World. Promoting Professional and Personal Renewal
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1