Do New Capital Requirements Make Loans More Expensive? An Empirical Study for the Colombian Banking System

Nydia Remolina
{"title":"Do New Capital Requirements Make Loans More Expensive? An Empirical Study for the Colombian Banking System","authors":"Nydia Remolina","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.2861607","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"After the financial crisis Basel III Committee recommended new capital ratio regulations for the banking system. Colombian regulators adopted some of these recommendations in 2012 through the Decree 1771 of 2012, particularly regarding capital requirements applicable to banks. Some scholars claim that additional capital requirements – as the ones recommended by Basel III – make loans more expensive and also affect the expansion of lending. However, some other scholars dispute this statement. This paper tests both hypotheses relying in Colombian banks data and the results of an econometric analysis based on Differences in Differences (DID) methodology. On one hand, a model confirms the hypothesis about the correlation between capital requirements and rates of loans in Colombia. On the other hand, another model confirms the hypothesis about the correlation between capital requirements and volumes of loans in Colombia. Both models analyze data from a time series from 2006 to 2015. Part of the data was collected from the Superintendency of Financial Institutions and includes 25 banks, which represent the entire population. Some other data – the control variables – was collected from National Department of Statistics and World Bank’s database for Colombia.The conclusions provided in this paper are relevant for the Colombian financial regulator since the 2016 Colombian Unit of Financial Regulation’s agenda has the evaluation of the implementation of Basel III capital adequacy requirements as a priority. The regulator will prepare by the end of this year a document regarding this matter. Moreover, Colombia – as other emerging economies – currently faces significant financing necessities. The government pursues very ambitious goals in financial inclusion and infrastructure in the medium and long term. Regarding financial inclusion, the government expects to expand the lending activity performed by banks and concerning infrastructure; the government plans to develop huge highways across the country. The role of the banking system, as lender, in both projects is key. Therefore, this paper is relevant for the policy discussion within the Colombian financial industry. Additionally, this paper analyzes the differences between the financial system’s structure that motivated Basel III recommendations and Colombian banking system. This study will allow regulators and policy makers to measure the impact of these recommendations after being applied to underdeveloped banking systems structures. Finally, the Basel Committee is currently undertaking an ambitious revision of the Basel III recommendations. So far, the discussion focuses on the Risk Weighted Assets (RWA). New provisions regarding RWA, necessarily, will affect the capital ratios because banks will have to improve their capital in order to maintain the required ratios. The global banking industry is greatly concerned about the potential additional tightening of capital requirements due to the conservative bias in the calibration of the proposals so far published.","PeriodicalId":414741,"journal":{"name":"Econometric Modeling: Financial Markets Regulation eJournal","volume":"94 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-11-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Econometric Modeling: Financial Markets Regulation eJournal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2861607","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

After the financial crisis Basel III Committee recommended new capital ratio regulations for the banking system. Colombian regulators adopted some of these recommendations in 2012 through the Decree 1771 of 2012, particularly regarding capital requirements applicable to banks. Some scholars claim that additional capital requirements – as the ones recommended by Basel III – make loans more expensive and also affect the expansion of lending. However, some other scholars dispute this statement. This paper tests both hypotheses relying in Colombian banks data and the results of an econometric analysis based on Differences in Differences (DID) methodology. On one hand, a model confirms the hypothesis about the correlation between capital requirements and rates of loans in Colombia. On the other hand, another model confirms the hypothesis about the correlation between capital requirements and volumes of loans in Colombia. Both models analyze data from a time series from 2006 to 2015. Part of the data was collected from the Superintendency of Financial Institutions and includes 25 banks, which represent the entire population. Some other data – the control variables – was collected from National Department of Statistics and World Bank’s database for Colombia.The conclusions provided in this paper are relevant for the Colombian financial regulator since the 2016 Colombian Unit of Financial Regulation’s agenda has the evaluation of the implementation of Basel III capital adequacy requirements as a priority. The regulator will prepare by the end of this year a document regarding this matter. Moreover, Colombia – as other emerging economies – currently faces significant financing necessities. The government pursues very ambitious goals in financial inclusion and infrastructure in the medium and long term. Regarding financial inclusion, the government expects to expand the lending activity performed by banks and concerning infrastructure; the government plans to develop huge highways across the country. The role of the banking system, as lender, in both projects is key. Therefore, this paper is relevant for the policy discussion within the Colombian financial industry. Additionally, this paper analyzes the differences between the financial system’s structure that motivated Basel III recommendations and Colombian banking system. This study will allow regulators and policy makers to measure the impact of these recommendations after being applied to underdeveloped banking systems structures. Finally, the Basel Committee is currently undertaking an ambitious revision of the Basel III recommendations. So far, the discussion focuses on the Risk Weighted Assets (RWA). New provisions regarding RWA, necessarily, will affect the capital ratios because banks will have to improve their capital in order to maintain the required ratios. The global banking industry is greatly concerned about the potential additional tightening of capital requirements due to the conservative bias in the calibration of the proposals so far published.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
新的资本要求会使贷款成本更高吗?哥伦比亚银行体系的实证研究
金融危机后,巴塞尔协议III委员会(Basel III Committee)建议对银行体系实施新的资本比率规定。2012年,哥伦比亚监管机构通过2012年第1771号法令采纳了其中一些建议,特别是关于适用于银行的资本要求。一些学者声称,额外的资本要求——正如《巴塞尔协议III》所建议的那样——使贷款成本更高,也影响了贷款的扩张。然而,其他一些学者对这种说法提出异议。本文以哥伦比亚银行数据和基于差异中的差异(DID)方法的计量经济学分析结果为依据,对两种假设进行了检验。一方面,模型证实了哥伦比亚资本要求与贷款利率之间相关性的假设。另一方面,另一个模型证实了关于哥伦比亚资本要求与贷款额之间相关性的假设。这两个模型都分析了从2006年到2015年的时间序列数据。部分数据是从金融机构监管局收集的,包括25家银行,代表了整个人口。其他一些数据——控制变量——是从哥伦比亚国家统计局和世界银行的数据库中收集的。本文提供的结论与哥伦比亚金融监管机构相关,因为2016年哥伦比亚金融监管部门的议程将巴塞尔协议III资本充足率要求的实施评估作为优先事项。监管机构将在今年年底前准备一份有关此事的文件。此外,与其他新兴经济体一样,哥伦比亚目前面临着巨大的融资需求。政府在金融普惠和基础设施方面追求非常雄心勃勃的中长期目标。在普惠金融方面,政府希望扩大银行和基础设施的贷款活动;政府计划在全国各地修建高速公路。在这两个项目中,银行体系作为贷款人所扮演的角色至关重要。因此,本文对哥伦比亚金融行业内部的政策讨论具有重要意义。此外,本文还分析了推动巴塞尔协议III建议的金融体系结构与哥伦比亚银行体系之间的差异。这项研究将使监管者和政策制定者能够衡量这些建议在应用于不发达的银行体系结构后的影响。最后,巴塞尔委员会目前正在对巴塞尔协议III的建议进行雄心勃勃的修订。到目前为止,讨论的重点是风险加权资产(RWA)。关于RWA的新规定必然会影响资本比率,因为银行将不得不改善其资本以维持所需的比率。全球银行业对资本要求可能进一步收紧深感担忧,因为迄今公布的建议在校准方面存在保守倾向。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Dynamic CoVaR Third Party Monitoring, Regulatory Compliance and Financial Reporting: Evidence from Banking Who watches the Auctioneer? Supervising primary bond markets to reduce agency costs MiCA and DeFi ('Proposal for a Regulation on Market in Crypto-Assets' and 'Decentralised Finance') COVID-19, Credit Risk and Macro Fundamentals
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1