Capital Allowance and Companies Income Tax Act in Nigeria

K. Nwonyuku
{"title":"Capital Allowance and Companies Income Tax Act in Nigeria","authors":"K. Nwonyuku","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3434959","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper discusses the implications of capital allowances for companies’ income tax purposes in Nigeria. Capital allowance scheme is one of the potentials for improving tax revenue generation in Nigeria. It is a latent value adding mechanism to a business, and a form of based erosion tax sharing (BETS) model that depletes expected tax effect on a business and shifts it to the taxpayer for incurring qualifying expenditure in respect of certain assets. It is an inbuilt expansionary tax fiscal policy that has the capacity to boost economic growth and prosperity. Yet, this scheme over time has been undermined, misused and abused by the relevant quarters. This study tends to rekindle the need and opportunity available in religious implementation of capital allowance regime. It is an investment and industrial output growth; and when it is properly employed, industries will grow to prosperity. In addition to its benefits, it complements the effort of the government in attracting foreign direct investments and to attaining national economic objectives. This paper employs descriptive study and secondary data collection methods to examine the conceptual and regulatory provisions, among other issues concerning the system of capital allowance. Findings from the study confirm that effective implementation of capital allowance scheme can deepen tax compliance culture, increase tax revenue performance and enhance investment in productive non-current assets of companies in Nigeria. Also, it affirms a clear distinction between capital allowance and capital gains tax for companies as well as deducts that there is a reducing effect of different forms of capital allowances on arriving at total profits for company income tax purposes in Nigeria, except for balancing charges. Hence, it is just and reasonable to conclude that a strong and positive connection does exist between capital allowance and tax compliance, tax revenue collection and economic growth and prosperity in Nigeria. Among other recommendations, this paper proposes that management of relevant tax authority should put stringent measures to ensure that all capital allowances claimable are verifiable, justifiable and reasonable as well as meet the regulatory conditions as provided by the extant tax legislations.","PeriodicalId":330166,"journal":{"name":"Law & Society: Public Law - Tax eJournal","volume":"35 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-03-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Law & Society: Public Law - Tax eJournal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3434959","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This paper discusses the implications of capital allowances for companies’ income tax purposes in Nigeria. Capital allowance scheme is one of the potentials for improving tax revenue generation in Nigeria. It is a latent value adding mechanism to a business, and a form of based erosion tax sharing (BETS) model that depletes expected tax effect on a business and shifts it to the taxpayer for incurring qualifying expenditure in respect of certain assets. It is an inbuilt expansionary tax fiscal policy that has the capacity to boost economic growth and prosperity. Yet, this scheme over time has been undermined, misused and abused by the relevant quarters. This study tends to rekindle the need and opportunity available in religious implementation of capital allowance regime. It is an investment and industrial output growth; and when it is properly employed, industries will grow to prosperity. In addition to its benefits, it complements the effort of the government in attracting foreign direct investments and to attaining national economic objectives. This paper employs descriptive study and secondary data collection methods to examine the conceptual and regulatory provisions, among other issues concerning the system of capital allowance. Findings from the study confirm that effective implementation of capital allowance scheme can deepen tax compliance culture, increase tax revenue performance and enhance investment in productive non-current assets of companies in Nigeria. Also, it affirms a clear distinction between capital allowance and capital gains tax for companies as well as deducts that there is a reducing effect of different forms of capital allowances on arriving at total profits for company income tax purposes in Nigeria, except for balancing charges. Hence, it is just and reasonable to conclude that a strong and positive connection does exist between capital allowance and tax compliance, tax revenue collection and economic growth and prosperity in Nigeria. Among other recommendations, this paper proposes that management of relevant tax authority should put stringent measures to ensure that all capital allowances claimable are verifiable, justifiable and reasonable as well as meet the regulatory conditions as provided by the extant tax legislations.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
尼日利亚的资本补贴和公司所得税法
本文讨论了资本补贴对尼日利亚公司所得税目的的影响。资本补贴计划是改善尼日利亚税收产生的潜力之一。这是一种潜在的企业增值机制,也是一种基于侵蚀性税收分担(BETS)模式的形式,它减少了对企业的预期税收影响,并将其转移到纳税人身上,以产生有关某些资产的合格支出。这是一项内在的扩张性税收财政政策,有能力促进经济增长和繁荣。然而,长期以来,这一机制遭到有关方面的破坏、误用和滥用。本研究旨在重新点燃宗教实施资本补贴制度的必要性和机会。这是投资和工业产出的增长;当它被恰当地运用时,工业将走向繁荣。除了它的好处,它补充了政府在吸引外国直接投资和实现国家经济目标方面的努力。本文采用描述性研究和二手数据收集的方法来考察资本免税额制度的概念和监管规定等问题。研究结果证实,资本补贴计划的有效实施可以深化税收合规文化,提高税收绩效,并增加尼日利亚公司对生产性非流动资产的投资。此外,它确认资本津贴和公司的资本利得税之间有明确的区别,以及扣除,不同形式的资本津贴对达到尼日利亚公司所得税目的的总利润有减少作用,但平衡费用除外。因此,公正合理地得出结论,在尼日利亚,资本补贴与税收合规、税收征收和经济增长与繁荣之间确实存在着强烈而积极的联系。其中,建议相关税务机关的管理应采取严格措施,确保所有可申请的资本免税额都是可核实的、正当的、合理的,并符合现行税收立法规定的监管条件。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Misdirected Recipients of Tax Reform: Section 199A, its True Beneficiaries, and Application to Low- and Middle- Income Residents Consistent Taxation in a Cashless Society Is It Time to Eliminate Federal Corporate Income Taxes? Brief of Amici Curiae Former Government Officials in Support of Respondents, CIC Services, LLC v. Internal Revenue Service Allocating COVID-19 State Aid Equitably – The Case of Denmark
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1