{"title":"Bitcoins as Property: Welcome Clarity?","authors":"K. F. Low","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3538956","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In AA v Persons Unknown & Ors, Re Bitcoin [2019] EWHC 3556 (Comm), Bryan J offered the first reasoned judgment for deciding that bitcoins were property under English law for the purposes of an interim proprietary injunction, following similar, less fully reasoned, decisions in Vorotyntseva v Money-4 Ltd, t/a Nebeus.com [2018] EWHC 2598 (Ch) by Birss J and Liam David Robertson v Persons Unknown (unreported 15 July 2019) by Moulder J, and also relying upon the controversial decision of the Singapore International Commercial Court in B2C2 Ltd v Quoine Pte Ltd [2019] SGHC(I) 3; [2019] 4 SLR 17. This paper critiques the court's conclusion that bitcoins are an intangible property but not a chose in action.","PeriodicalId":128369,"journal":{"name":"CompSciRN: Other Cybersecurity","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-02-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"CompSciRN: Other Cybersecurity","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3538956","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
Abstract
In AA v Persons Unknown & Ors, Re Bitcoin [2019] EWHC 3556 (Comm), Bryan J offered the first reasoned judgment for deciding that bitcoins were property under English law for the purposes of an interim proprietary injunction, following similar, less fully reasoned, decisions in Vorotyntseva v Money-4 Ltd, t/a Nebeus.com [2018] EWHC 2598 (Ch) by Birss J and Liam David Robertson v Persons Unknown (unreported 15 July 2019) by Moulder J, and also relying upon the controversial decision of the Singapore International Commercial Court in B2C2 Ltd v Quoine Pte Ltd [2019] SGHC(I) 3; [2019] 4 SLR 17. This paper critiques the court's conclusion that bitcoins are an intangible property but not a chose in action.