Development of a Physicians’ Choice Model Using Mixed Logit With Random Prices for Drugs Case Study on Diabetes Type II

C. Huttin, J. Hausman
{"title":"Development of a Physicians’ Choice Model Using Mixed Logit With Random Prices for Drugs Case Study on Diabetes Type II","authors":"C. Huttin, J. Hausman","doi":"10.21203/rs.3.rs-124401/v1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n This paper presents a first experiment with random generator of drug prices and a first simulation on physicians’ treatment choices (case on pharmacotherapies) for diabetes type II care. It also aims to compare the effects of the price variables according to public versus private health plans on physicians’ choices (Medicare versus commercial Health Plans). The base line model used is a Mixed Logit model with Random Price variables. A series of experiments with random parameters generations is designed with various sequences and number of draws. The model is tested on a real analytical dataset, extracted from the CDC physician survey (National Ambulatory Care Survey, NAMCS), for patients with diabetes type II without complications, for previous predictive econometrics with ENDEPUSresearch, Inc. The model uses a first drug choice set with three alternatives: oral agents only, combined therapies, no drug. The choice models introduce qualitative dependent variables and complement the series of cumulative logistic models per disease. The matlab code for the new specification test on the Independence of Irrelevant Alternatives at individual level is modified to fit this type of medical applications; first runs compare main parameters of a full choice set versus reduced choice sets of alternatives. It is planned to design more experiments for extended choice sets and widespread applications, in order to lead to user friendly tools for medical systems. The collaboration with Professor Jerry Hausman on the US market will help with use of results and new ways to adjust the reliability on the selection of alternatives; it may provide additional guidance to the algorithms used by professionals and for health policies.","PeriodicalId":127914,"journal":{"name":"Archives of Health Science","volume":"28 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-12-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Archives of Health Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-124401/v1","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

This paper presents a first experiment with random generator of drug prices and a first simulation on physicians’ treatment choices (case on pharmacotherapies) for diabetes type II care. It also aims to compare the effects of the price variables according to public versus private health plans on physicians’ choices (Medicare versus commercial Health Plans). The base line model used is a Mixed Logit model with Random Price variables. A series of experiments with random parameters generations is designed with various sequences and number of draws. The model is tested on a real analytical dataset, extracted from the CDC physician survey (National Ambulatory Care Survey, NAMCS), for patients with diabetes type II without complications, for previous predictive econometrics with ENDEPUSresearch, Inc. The model uses a first drug choice set with three alternatives: oral agents only, combined therapies, no drug. The choice models introduce qualitative dependent variables and complement the series of cumulative logistic models per disease. The matlab code for the new specification test on the Independence of Irrelevant Alternatives at individual level is modified to fit this type of medical applications; first runs compare main parameters of a full choice set versus reduced choice sets of alternatives. It is planned to design more experiments for extended choice sets and widespread applications, in order to lead to user friendly tools for medical systems. The collaboration with Professor Jerry Hausman on the US market will help with use of results and new ways to adjust the reliability on the selection of alternatives; it may provide additional guidance to the algorithms used by professionals and for health policies.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
基于混合Logit随机价格的II型糖尿病医生选择模型的建立
本文提出了第一个药物价格随机生成器实验和第一个模拟医生的治疗选择(药物治疗的情况下)II型糖尿病护理。它还旨在比较公共和私人健康计划对医生选择的价格变量的影响(医疗保险与商业健康计划)。使用的基线模型是带有随机价格变量的混合Logit模型。设计了一系列具有随机参数生成的实验,具有不同的序列和绘制次数。该模型在一个真实的分析数据集上进行了测试,该数据集提取自CDC医师调查(国家门诊护理调查,NAMCS),用于无并发症的II型糖尿病患者,用于ENDEPUSresearch, Inc.先前的预测计量经济学。该模型使用第一种药物选择集,有三种替代方案:仅口服药物,联合治疗,不使用药物。选择模型引入了定性因变量,并补充了每种疾病的累积logistic模型系列。在个人层面上对无关替代独立性的新规范测试的matlab代码进行了修改,以适应此类医疗应用;第一次运行比较完整选择集和简化选择集的主要参数。计划为扩展的选择集和广泛的应用设计更多的实验,以便为医疗系统提供用户友好的工具。与Jerry Hausman教授在美国市场的合作将有助于使用结果和新方法来调整替代品选择的可靠性;它可以为专业人员使用的算法和卫生政策提供额外的指导。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Misoprostol plus Isosorbide Mononitrate versus Misoprostol for Termination of Anembryonic Pregnancy COVID-19 Pandemic and Blood Donation Services: Perspective of Low-Resource Country 10.31829/2641-7456/ahs2021-5(1)-013 Look at the COVID-19 Pandemic with an Open Mind Mercy Not Sacrifice: Lessons from Christianity for COVID-19 Pandemic Potential Abuse of Negative Pressure Wound Therapy (NPWT)
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1