Influence of Prognostic Group Classification of Advanced Male Germ Cell Tumor on Treatment Outcomes

{"title":"Influence of Prognostic Group Classification of Advanced Male Germ Cell Tumor on Treatment Outcomes","authors":"","doi":"10.37184/lnjcc.2789-0112.4.2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Male germ cell tumor is a rare disease, associated with high rates of cure, including in the advanced setting. This disease mostly affects young males aged 15-34 years. The rising incidence trends of germ cell tumors in the last two decades have defined a new priority area of oncology. \n\nObjective: To investigate the influence of prognostic group classification and histology on treatment outcomes in men treated in a single institution in Pakistan. \n\nMethods: We developed an observational study on fifty male patients diagnosed with advanced germ cell cancer completing first-line treatment, between 2011-2014. Patients with a follow-up time of at least 5 years post-treatment were included. Patients were classified into good, intermediate, and poor prognostic groups, according to the International Germ Cell Cancer Collaborative Group classification (IGCCCG). The outcomes of all three prognostic groups were measured including response to first-line treatment according to Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center criteria and five years OS. Survival rates were calculated using Kaplan and Meier method. The level of significance was set at P < 0.05.\n\nResults: Overall 50 patients were included in the study. The mean age of patients was 30.6 years + 9.49 years. The most common primary site of involvement was the right testicle i.e.56.0%. Complete responses (CR) were observed in 23 (46.0%) patients. The patients classified into the good prognostic group (n=29) had significantly superior (p=0.002) five years OS (86.2%, n= 25) than intermediate and poor groups. Additionally, CR was higher for seminoma-type cancer i.e. 12 (63.15%) while it was limited to 11(35.48%) in non-seminoma; however, the inferior response rate in NSGCT did not translate into statistical significance in 5 years OS.\n\nConclusion: The IGCCCG prognostic grouping system is an effective tool for predicting treatment outcomes in terms of 5-year overall survival in our local population based in a low-middle income setting.","PeriodicalId":363682,"journal":{"name":"Liaquat National Journal of Cancer Care","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Liaquat National Journal of Cancer Care","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.37184/lnjcc.2789-0112.4.2","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Male germ cell tumor is a rare disease, associated with high rates of cure, including in the advanced setting. This disease mostly affects young males aged 15-34 years. The rising incidence trends of germ cell tumors in the last two decades have defined a new priority area of oncology. Objective: To investigate the influence of prognostic group classification and histology on treatment outcomes in men treated in a single institution in Pakistan. Methods: We developed an observational study on fifty male patients diagnosed with advanced germ cell cancer completing first-line treatment, between 2011-2014. Patients with a follow-up time of at least 5 years post-treatment were included. Patients were classified into good, intermediate, and poor prognostic groups, according to the International Germ Cell Cancer Collaborative Group classification (IGCCCG). The outcomes of all three prognostic groups were measured including response to first-line treatment according to Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center criteria and five years OS. Survival rates were calculated using Kaplan and Meier method. The level of significance was set at P < 0.05. Results: Overall 50 patients were included in the study. The mean age of patients was 30.6 years + 9.49 years. The most common primary site of involvement was the right testicle i.e.56.0%. Complete responses (CR) were observed in 23 (46.0%) patients. The patients classified into the good prognostic group (n=29) had significantly superior (p=0.002) five years OS (86.2%, n= 25) than intermediate and poor groups. Additionally, CR was higher for seminoma-type cancer i.e. 12 (63.15%) while it was limited to 11(35.48%) in non-seminoma; however, the inferior response rate in NSGCT did not translate into statistical significance in 5 years OS. Conclusion: The IGCCCG prognostic grouping system is an effective tool for predicting treatment outcomes in terms of 5-year overall survival in our local population based in a low-middle income setting.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
晚期男性生殖细胞瘤预后分组分类对治疗结果的影响
背景:男性生殖细胞肿瘤是一种罕见的疾病,具有很高的治愈率,包括在晚期。这种疾病主要影响15-34岁的年轻男性。在过去的二十年中,生殖细胞肿瘤发病率的上升趋势已经确定了肿瘤学的一个新的优先领域。目的:探讨预后组分类和组织学对在巴基斯坦单一机构治疗的男性治疗结果的影响。方法:我们开展了一项观察性研究,研究对象是2011-2014年间50例确诊为晚期生殖细胞癌并完成一线治疗的男性患者。治疗后随访时间至少为5年的患者纳入研究。根据国际生殖细胞癌合作分类(IGCCCG),将患者分为预后良好、中度和预后不良组。所有三个预后组的结果被测量,包括根据纪念斯隆-凯特琳癌症中心标准和5年生存期对一线治疗的反应。生存率采用Kaplan和Meier法计算。P < 0.05为显著性水平。结果:共纳入50例患者。患者平均年龄30.6岁+ 9.49岁。最常见的原发受累部位为右睾丸(56.0%)。23例(46.0%)患者出现完全缓解(CR)。预后良好组(n=29)患者的5年OS (86.2%, n= 25)明显优于中、差组(p=0.002)。此外,精原细胞瘤型癌症的CR较高,为12(63.15%),而非精原细胞瘤的CR仅为11(35.48%);然而,NSGCT的低有效率在5年生存率中没有转化为统计学意义。结论:IGCCCG预后分组系统是预测我国中低收入地区当地人群5年总体生存治疗结果的有效工具。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Ileocolic Anastomotic Site Recurrence End- of- Life Care: Beneficence Undermines Patient’s Autonomy Neurocognitive Functions after Stereotactic Radiosurgery - An Analysis with Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) Burden of Hepatocellular Carcinoma and Pattern of Hepatitis B and C Presentation among HCC Patients: A Retrospective Study from a Tertiary Care Hospital in Karachi, Pakistan Incidental Finding of Bladder Carcinoma during Stone Removal: A Rare Correlation and Upcoming Physician Challenge
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1