Kiss from a Rogue: Evaluating Detectability of Pay-at-the-Pump Card Skimmers

Nolen Scaife, Jasmine Bowers, Christian Peeters, Grant Hernandez, Imani N. Sherman, Patrick Traynor, Lisa Anthony
{"title":"Kiss from a Rogue: Evaluating Detectability of Pay-at-the-Pump Card Skimmers","authors":"Nolen Scaife, Jasmine Bowers, Christian Peeters, Grant Hernandez, Imani N. Sherman, Patrick Traynor, Lisa Anthony","doi":"10.1109/SP.2019.00077","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Credit and debit cards enable financial transactions at unattended \"pay-at-the-pump\" gas station terminals across North America. Attackers discreetly open these pumps and install skimmers, which copy sensitive card data. While EMV (“chip-and-PIN”) has made substantial inroads in traditional retailers, such systems have virtually no deployment at pay-at-the-pump terminals due to dramatically higher costs and logistical/regulatory constraints, leaving consumers vulnerable in these contexts. In an effort to improve security, station owners have deployed security indicators such as low-cost tamper-evident seals, and technologists have developed skimmer detection apps for mobile phones. Not only do these solutions put the onus on consumers to notice and react to security concerns at the pump, but the efficacy of these solutions has not been measured. In this paper, we evaluate the indicators available to consumers to detect skimmers. We perform a comprehensive teardown of all known skimmer detection apps for iOS and Android devices, and then conduct a forensic analysis of real-world gas pump skimmer hardware recovered by multiple law enforcement agencies. Finally, we analyze anti-skimmer mechanisms deployed by pump owners/operators, and augment this investigation with an analysis of skimmer reports and accompanying security measures collected by the Florida Department of Agriculture and Consumer Services over four years, making this the most comprehensive long-term study of such devices. Our results show that common gas pump security indicators are not only ineffective at empowering consumers to detect tampering, but may be providing a false sense of security. Accordingly, stronger, reliable, inexpensive measures must be developed to protect consumers and merchants from fraud.","PeriodicalId":272713,"journal":{"name":"2019 IEEE Symposium on Security and Privacy (SP)","volume":"60 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-05-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"9","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2019 IEEE Symposium on Security and Privacy (SP)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/SP.2019.00077","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 9

Abstract

Credit and debit cards enable financial transactions at unattended "pay-at-the-pump" gas station terminals across North America. Attackers discreetly open these pumps and install skimmers, which copy sensitive card data. While EMV (“chip-and-PIN”) has made substantial inroads in traditional retailers, such systems have virtually no deployment at pay-at-the-pump terminals due to dramatically higher costs and logistical/regulatory constraints, leaving consumers vulnerable in these contexts. In an effort to improve security, station owners have deployed security indicators such as low-cost tamper-evident seals, and technologists have developed skimmer detection apps for mobile phones. Not only do these solutions put the onus on consumers to notice and react to security concerns at the pump, but the efficacy of these solutions has not been measured. In this paper, we evaluate the indicators available to consumers to detect skimmers. We perform a comprehensive teardown of all known skimmer detection apps for iOS and Android devices, and then conduct a forensic analysis of real-world gas pump skimmer hardware recovered by multiple law enforcement agencies. Finally, we analyze anti-skimmer mechanisms deployed by pump owners/operators, and augment this investigation with an analysis of skimmer reports and accompanying security measures collected by the Florida Department of Agriculture and Consumer Services over four years, making this the most comprehensive long-term study of such devices. Our results show that common gas pump security indicators are not only ineffective at empowering consumers to detect tampering, but may be providing a false sense of security. Accordingly, stronger, reliable, inexpensive measures must be developed to protect consumers and merchants from fraud.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
流氓之吻:评估在加油站刷卡的可探测性
信用卡和借记卡使金融交易可以在北美无人值守的加油站终端进行。攻击者会小心翼翼地打开这些泵并安装读取器,从而复制敏感的信用卡数据。虽然EMV(“芯片和密码”)已经在传统零售商中取得了重大进展,但由于成本高得多,加上物流/监管方面的限制,这种系统在加油站支付终端中几乎没有部署,这使得消费者在这些情况下容易受到伤害。为了提高安全性,加油站老板已经部署了安全指标,比如低成本的防篡改封条,技术人员已经开发了手机上的撇油器检测应用程序。这些解决方案不仅让消费者有责任注意到泵的安全问题并作出反应,而且这些解决方案的功效尚未得到衡量。在本文中,我们评估了消费者可用来检测撇脂者的指标。我们对iOS和Android设备上所有已知的撇脂器检测应用程序进行了全面的拆解,然后对多个执法机构恢复的真实加油站撇脂器硬件进行了法医分析。最后,我们分析了泵所有者/运营商部署的反撇油器机制,并通过分析佛罗里达州农业和消费者服务部在过去四年中收集的撇油器报告和附带的安全措施来扩大这项调查,使其成为此类设备最全面的长期研究。我们的研究结果表明,常见的气泵安全指标不仅在赋予消费者检测篡改的能力方面是无效的,而且可能提供一种虚假的安全感。因此,必须制定更有力、可靠、廉价的措施,保护消费者和商家免受欺诈。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The 9 Lives of Bleichenbacher's CAT: New Cache ATtacks on TLS Implementations CaSym: Cache Aware Symbolic Execution for Side Channel Detection and Mitigation PrivKV: Key-Value Data Collection with Local Differential Privacy Postcards from the Post-HTTP World: Amplification of HTTPS Vulnerabilities in the Web Ecosystem New Primitives for Actively-Secure MPC over Rings with Applications to Private Machine Learning
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1