Commentary on Autism and the double‐empathy problem: Implications for development and mental health

B. López
{"title":"Commentary on Autism and the double‐empathy problem: Implications for development and mental health","authors":"B. López","doi":"10.1111/bjdp.12410","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Mitchell et al.’s proposal that poor mental health in autism may stem from recurrent poor social interactions with non- autistic people across the lifespan, due to what Milton (2012) has termed as the double- empathy problem, is both timely and welcomed. It adds to the increasing voices advocating for a reconceptualization of autism as a condition that ‘ is both biologically and socially derived ’ (Milton, 2012, p. 866). Specifically, the authors question the validity of focusing the level of study of autism exclusively on the autistic person. In this respect, the authors stress the need to investigate, first, social interactions between autistic and non- autistic populations and, second, their impact over time on the mental health of autistic people. The calls for exploring the nature social interactions between autistic and non- autistic people are and the authors make a powerful argument for the need to do so. Specifically, they delineate a well- reasoned timeline understood by non- autistic people to feelings of loneliness the lack of a sense of belonging, which in turn, result in poor mental","PeriodicalId":237840,"journal":{"name":"The British journal of developmental psychology","volume":"18 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-03-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The British journal of developmental psychology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/bjdp.12410","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

Mitchell et al.’s proposal that poor mental health in autism may stem from recurrent poor social interactions with non- autistic people across the lifespan, due to what Milton (2012) has termed as the double- empathy problem, is both timely and welcomed. It adds to the increasing voices advocating for a reconceptualization of autism as a condition that ‘ is both biologically and socially derived ’ (Milton, 2012, p. 866). Specifically, the authors question the validity of focusing the level of study of autism exclusively on the autistic person. In this respect, the authors stress the need to investigate, first, social interactions between autistic and non- autistic populations and, second, their impact over time on the mental health of autistic people. The calls for exploring the nature social interactions between autistic and non- autistic people are and the authors make a powerful argument for the need to do so. Specifically, they delineate a well- reasoned timeline understood by non- autistic people to feelings of loneliness the lack of a sense of belonging, which in turn, result in poor mental
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
自闭症和双重共情问题:对发展和心理健康的影响
米切尔等人提出,自闭症患者的心理健康状况不佳可能源于一生中与非自闭症患者反复出现的不良社交互动,这是由于Milton(2012)所说的双重共情问题,这一建议既及时又受欢迎。它增加了越来越多的声音,倡导将自闭症重新定义为一种“生物学和社会派生”的情况(Milton, 2012, p. 866)。具体来说,作者质疑将自闭症的研究水平只集中在自闭症患者身上的有效性。在这方面,作者强调有必要调查,首先,自闭症和非自闭症人群之间的社会互动,其次,随着时间的推移,他们对自闭症患者心理健康的影响。探索自闭症患者和非自闭症患者之间的自然社会互动的呼吁是,作者为这样做的必要性提出了强有力的论据。具体地说,他们描绘了一个合理的时间表,非自闭症患者理解孤独的感觉,缺乏归属感,这反过来,导致精神状况不佳
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Motivations for social withdrawal and academic adjustment in emerging adulthood. Commentary on Autism and the double‐empathy problem: Implications for development and mental health Numeracy skills in young children as predictors of mathematical competence. Mastering balance: The use of balance bicycles promotes the development of independent cycling Collaboration at a microscale: Cultural differences in family interactions.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1