Appraisal of the Concept of Matrimonial Property under Nigerian Law

C. Ugwu
{"title":"Appraisal of the Concept of Matrimonial Property under Nigerian Law","authors":"C. Ugwu","doi":"10.56284/tnjr.v16i1.17","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Family and matrimonial contracts are often oral, unwritten and made without fear of breach. Consequently, spouses contribute both financially and non-financial towards the success of the marriage and acquisition of their matrimonial home. Often, the shared intentions of the spouses is usually to create a comfortable home for the family and each make indirect, invisible and unquantifiable sacrifices towards the success of the marriage. The State High Court is conferred with unlimited discretion in respect of matrimonial property and in exercising this discretion it often insists that a party must show evidence of substantial and direct financial contributions to the acquisition of matrimonial property before joint ownership of matrimonial property is inferred. Basically the library based research, is adopted in this article both the primary and secondary sources of law are cited. The findings of this article are: (1) Where there is a document of title in favour of one party to the marriage, that property is lost as a matrimonial property.(2) Where a party is insisting that the property in issue is jointly owned, that party is responsible for producing evidence to the effect that both parties contributed adequately to the acquisition of the said property, whether financially or otherwise.(3) Oral evidence, even, about the parties’ private arrangements cannot be allowed to contradict the content of document of title. This article recommends for a statutory definition of matrimonial property that will ingrain the socio-cultural norms and values regarding marital relations as a communal and partnership arrangement.","PeriodicalId":326636,"journal":{"name":"The Nigerian Juridical Review","volume":"45 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Nigerian Juridical Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.56284/tnjr.v16i1.17","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Family and matrimonial contracts are often oral, unwritten and made without fear of breach. Consequently, spouses contribute both financially and non-financial towards the success of the marriage and acquisition of their matrimonial home. Often, the shared intentions of the spouses is usually to create a comfortable home for the family and each make indirect, invisible and unquantifiable sacrifices towards the success of the marriage. The State High Court is conferred with unlimited discretion in respect of matrimonial property and in exercising this discretion it often insists that a party must show evidence of substantial and direct financial contributions to the acquisition of matrimonial property before joint ownership of matrimonial property is inferred. Basically the library based research, is adopted in this article both the primary and secondary sources of law are cited. The findings of this article are: (1) Where there is a document of title in favour of one party to the marriage, that property is lost as a matrimonial property.(2) Where a party is insisting that the property in issue is jointly owned, that party is responsible for producing evidence to the effect that both parties contributed adequately to the acquisition of the said property, whether financially or otherwise.(3) Oral evidence, even, about the parties’ private arrangements cannot be allowed to contradict the content of document of title. This article recommends for a statutory definition of matrimonial property that will ingrain the socio-cultural norms and values regarding marital relations as a communal and partnership arrangement.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
尼日利亚法律下夫妻财产概念的评析
家庭和婚姻契约通常是口头的,不成文的,而且不用担心违约。因此,配偶在经济上和非经济上都为婚姻的成功和获得婚姻住房作出了贡献。通常,夫妻双方的共同意图通常是为家庭创造一个舒适的家,双方都为婚姻的成功做出了间接的、无形的和无法量化的牺牲。国家高等法院在婚姻财产方面被赋予无限的自由裁量权,在行使这一自由裁量权时,它经常坚持一方必须出示对取得婚姻财产作出实质性和直接财务贡献的证据,然后才能推断婚姻财产的共同所有权。本文主要采用图书馆法研究,同时引用了一手法和第二手法。本文的研究结果如下:(2)一方当事人坚持认为所争财产为共同所有的,该一方当事人有责任提供证据,证明双方在取得该财产时,无论是在经济上还是在其他方面,都作出了充分的贡献。有关当事人的私人安排不得与所有权文件的内容相抵触。本文建议对婚姻财产进行法定定义,这将使社会文化规范和价值观将婚姻关系视为一种共同和伙伴关系的安排。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Impact of Climate Change Regime in Maintaining Internal Security in Nigeria Dysfunctional Nigerian Insurance Industry: Failure of Law or Regulation? Protection of Traditional Knowledge and its Relevance to National Economic Growth and Development in Nigeria Primary Health Care Approach to Achieving Universal Health Coverage in Nigeria: Are Extant Legal and Policy Regimes Adequate? Impact of the Public Procurement Act 2007 on the Functions of Governing Councils of Federal Universities in Nigeria
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1