Environmental and Socio-Economic Impacts of Ojodu-Berger Road Upgrade, Lagos, Nigeria

W. Alade
{"title":"Environmental and Socio-Economic Impacts of Ojodu-Berger Road Upgrade, Lagos, Nigeria","authors":"W. Alade","doi":"10.15641/JCBM.4.1.785","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Extensive road project in large cities produces diverse impacts. This study attempts an assessment of the environmental and socio-economic effects of a recent road upgrade, the mitigating measures of adverse effects experienced and their effectiveness in Ojodu Berger community, a major transport node in Lagos, southwestern Nigeria. Using a survey research design through questionnaire administration, 120 respondents comprising of 50 residents, 40 traders and 30 transport operators were sampled using the purposive sampling technique. The Relative Significance Index (RSI) of project impacts was measured using 27 variables as identified in the literature and general observation of situations in the project environment before the survey. On a 5-point Likert scale at the pre-construction, construction and post-construction phase of the project. The study reveals poor environmental conditions at the pre-construction phase, which became escalated in the construction phase; noise pollution is the most significant impact (RSI = 4.36). At the post-construction phase, encroachment on pedestrian facilities is the most significant impact (RSI = 4.20). Socio-economic impacts such as increased rental value, unemployment and displacement of businesses were also significant. The Mean Index (MI) of 3.14 for the construction phase impacts was the highest compared to 3.00 at the pre-construction phase and 3.02 at the post-construction phase. Mitigating measures against adverse impacts were both effective and ineffective, while some adverse impacts were not mitigated. There was no clear evidence that an impact study was done before project implementation. The study recommended strong government commitment to environmental and social impacts assessment of road development, more robust stakeholders' engagement for the formulation of strategies and measures to address the adverse impacts of similar projects in the future.","PeriodicalId":149221,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Construction Business and Management","volume":"16 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-04-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Construction Business and Management","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15641/JCBM.4.1.785","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Extensive road project in large cities produces diverse impacts. This study attempts an assessment of the environmental and socio-economic effects of a recent road upgrade, the mitigating measures of adverse effects experienced and their effectiveness in Ojodu Berger community, a major transport node in Lagos, southwestern Nigeria. Using a survey research design through questionnaire administration, 120 respondents comprising of 50 residents, 40 traders and 30 transport operators were sampled using the purposive sampling technique. The Relative Significance Index (RSI) of project impacts was measured using 27 variables as identified in the literature and general observation of situations in the project environment before the survey. On a 5-point Likert scale at the pre-construction, construction and post-construction phase of the project. The study reveals poor environmental conditions at the pre-construction phase, which became escalated in the construction phase; noise pollution is the most significant impact (RSI = 4.36). At the post-construction phase, encroachment on pedestrian facilities is the most significant impact (RSI = 4.20). Socio-economic impacts such as increased rental value, unemployment and displacement of businesses were also significant. The Mean Index (MI) of 3.14 for the construction phase impacts was the highest compared to 3.00 at the pre-construction phase and 3.02 at the post-construction phase. Mitigating measures against adverse impacts were both effective and ineffective, while some adverse impacts were not mitigated. There was no clear evidence that an impact study was done before project implementation. The study recommended strong government commitment to environmental and social impacts assessment of road development, more robust stakeholders' engagement for the formulation of strategies and measures to address the adverse impacts of similar projects in the future.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
尼日利亚拉各斯Ojodu-Berger公路升级工程的环境和社会经济影响
大城市大规模的道路工程产生了多种影响。本研究试图评估最近道路升级对环境和社会经济的影响,对尼日利亚西南部拉各斯的主要交通枢纽Ojodu Berger社区所经历的不利影响的缓解措施及其有效性。采用调查研究设计,通过问卷管理,120名受访者,包括50名居民,40名贸易商和30名运输经营者采用有目的的抽样技术。项目影响的相对显著性指数(RSI)是使用文献中确定的27个变量和调查前对项目环境情况的一般观察来测量的。在项目的施工前,施工中和施工后阶段采用5分李克特量表。研究发现,工程前期环境条件较差,施工阶段环境条件恶化;噪声污染是最显著的影响(RSI = 4.36)。在施工后阶段,对行人设施的侵占影响最为显著(RSI = 4.20)。社会经济影响,如租金增加、失业和企业流离失所也很重要。施工阶段影响的平均指数(MI)为3.14,高于施工前阶段的3.00和施工后阶段的3.02。缓解不利影响的措施既有效又无效,而一些不利影响并没有得到缓解。没有明确证据表明在项目实施前进行了影响研究。该研究建议政府在道路发展的环境和社会影响评估方面作出强有力的承诺,并在制定策略和措施方面加强利益相关者的参与,以应对未来类似项目的不利影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Assessment of Awareness and Barriers to the Application of Lean Construction Techniques in Kano State, Nigeria Sustainable Construction Transition (SCT) Policy Regime in Kenya A Measure of Combustion-Generated Pollutants in University Laboratories and their Effects on the Indoor Air Quality Contributing Elements and Issues to Strategic Management in the Construction Industry Among Small and Medium Enterprises: A Case Study in South Africa's eThekwini Region Evaluation of compliance of concreting materials to standards in building projects in Lagos State, Nigeria
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1