Comparison of TLS and sUAS point clouds for monitoring embankment dams

D. Bolkas, M. O'Banion, Jakeb Prickett, Gregory Ellsworth, Gerald Rusek, Hannah J. Corson
{"title":"Comparison of TLS and sUAS point clouds for monitoring embankment dams","authors":"D. Bolkas, M. O'Banion, Jakeb Prickett, Gregory Ellsworth, Gerald Rusek, Hannah J. Corson","doi":"10.4995/jisdm2022.2022.13868","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Monitoring of dams is an essential surveying task to guarantee the safety of operation and understand the physical processes concerning their movement. Point cloud generating technologies are increasingly being utilized for monitoring of engineered structures. This paper compares point clouds acquired from terrestrial laser scanning (TLS) and small unmanned aerial systems (sUAS)-based photogrammetry for monitoring of the Francis E. Walter dam in northeast Pennsylvania. Authorized for construction by the Flood Control Act of 1946, and with renewed interest due to extensive flooding in 1955 caused by the back-to-back hurricanes Connie and Diane, this earth-filled embankment dam was completed in June of 1961 by the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers. It is currently operated in conjunction with Beltzville Lake for stage reductions on the Lehigh River. The dam is being monitored through conventional surveying methods (total station) every five years. In spring of 2021 a TLS and sUAS data acquisition took place to assess the feasibility and utility of using modern point cloud technologies for monitoring. This paper presents a comprehensive comparison and accuracy assessment of the two point cloud collection methods, considering several parameters for the generation of the sUAS photogrammetric point cloud. Results show the advantages and disadvantages of the two methods. For instance, TLS offers high accuracy (cm-level), but suffers from data gaps due to line of sight blockage/occlusion. On the other hand, sUAS photogrammetry offers more complete point clouds, but presents more challenges in georeferencing and in the generation of accurate point clouds. Similar insights and lessons learned are useful for future surveying tasks and monitoring of similar embankment dam structures.","PeriodicalId":404487,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the 5th Joint International Symposium on Deformation Monitoring - JISDM 2022","volume":"100 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the 5th Joint International Symposium on Deformation Monitoring - JISDM 2022","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4995/jisdm2022.2022.13868","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Monitoring of dams is an essential surveying task to guarantee the safety of operation and understand the physical processes concerning their movement. Point cloud generating technologies are increasingly being utilized for monitoring of engineered structures. This paper compares point clouds acquired from terrestrial laser scanning (TLS) and small unmanned aerial systems (sUAS)-based photogrammetry for monitoring of the Francis E. Walter dam in northeast Pennsylvania. Authorized for construction by the Flood Control Act of 1946, and with renewed interest due to extensive flooding in 1955 caused by the back-to-back hurricanes Connie and Diane, this earth-filled embankment dam was completed in June of 1961 by the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers. It is currently operated in conjunction with Beltzville Lake for stage reductions on the Lehigh River. The dam is being monitored through conventional surveying methods (total station) every five years. In spring of 2021 a TLS and sUAS data acquisition took place to assess the feasibility and utility of using modern point cloud technologies for monitoring. This paper presents a comprehensive comparison and accuracy assessment of the two point cloud collection methods, considering several parameters for the generation of the sUAS photogrammetric point cloud. Results show the advantages and disadvantages of the two methods. For instance, TLS offers high accuracy (cm-level), but suffers from data gaps due to line of sight blockage/occlusion. On the other hand, sUAS photogrammetry offers more complete point clouds, but presents more challenges in georeferencing and in the generation of accurate point clouds. Similar insights and lessons learned are useful for future surveying tasks and monitoring of similar embankment dam structures.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
TLS点云与sUAS点云监测路堤坝的比较
大坝监测是保证大坝安全运行和了解大坝运动物理过程的重要测量任务。点云生成技术越来越多地用于工程结构的监测。本文比较了地面激光扫描(TLS)和基于小型无人机系统(sUAS)的摄影测量所获得的点云,用于监测宾夕法尼亚州东北部的弗朗西斯·e·沃尔特大坝。根据1946年《防洪法案》的授权,由于1955年连续的飓风康妮和黛安造成了大面积的洪水,这座填土堤坝于1961年6月由美国陆军工程兵团完成。目前,它与贝尔茨维尔湖一起在利哈伊河上进行阶段缩减。大坝每五年通过常规测量方法(全站仪)进行监测。2021年春季,进行了TLS和sUAS数据采集,以评估使用现代点云技术进行监测的可行性和实用性。考虑到sUAS摄影测量点云生成的几个参数,对两种点云采集方法进行了全面的比较和精度评估。结果显示了两种方法的优缺点。例如,TLS提供高精度(厘米级),但由于视线阻塞/遮挡而存在数据缺口。另一方面,sUAS摄影测量提供了更完整的点云,但在地理参考和精确点云的生成方面提出了更多的挑战。类似的见解和经验教训对未来的测量任务和类似堤坝结构的监测是有用的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Landslide monitoring using geotechnical, UAV, GNSS and MTInSAR instrumentation Evaluation of synthetic aperture radar interferometric techniques for monitoring of fast deformation caused by underground mining exploitation Long and close-range terrestrial photogrammetry for rocky landscape deformation monitoring PS-InSAR and UAV technology used in the stability study of Ankang expansive soil airport Deformation analysis in landslides NE Bulgaria using GNSS data complemented by InSAR for better interpretation results
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1