Buber versus Scholem and the Figure of the Hasidic Jew: A Literary Debate between Two Political Theologies

Hannan Hever
{"title":"Buber versus Scholem and the Figure of the Hasidic Jew: A Literary Debate between Two Political Theologies","authors":"Hannan Hever","doi":"10.5422/FORDHAM/9780823282005.003.0010","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This chapter looks at one of the most famous and significant debates in Jewish studies: between Gershom Scholem and Martin Buber over the character of Hasidism. On the face of it, the debate was a literary one, centering on the significance of the Hasidic tale and its role in the interpretation of the Hasidic movement. It was a debate between two conceptions of Hasidism, one as a system of theological concepts, and the other as a way of life. Yet this debate was not merely historicist, but topical and political as well. For in this debate, Buber and Scholem negotiated the question of Jewish sovereignty and endeavored to determine the desired relationship between Jews and the state.","PeriodicalId":293041,"journal":{"name":"Jews and the Ends of Theory","volume":"31 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-12-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Jews and the Ends of Theory","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5422/FORDHAM/9780823282005.003.0010","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This chapter looks at one of the most famous and significant debates in Jewish studies: between Gershom Scholem and Martin Buber over the character of Hasidism. On the face of it, the debate was a literary one, centering on the significance of the Hasidic tale and its role in the interpretation of the Hasidic movement. It was a debate between two conceptions of Hasidism, one as a system of theological concepts, and the other as a way of life. Yet this debate was not merely historicist, but topical and political as well. For in this debate, Buber and Scholem negotiated the question of Jewish sovereignty and endeavored to determine the desired relationship between Jews and the state.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
布伯对朔勒姆和哈西德派犹太人的形象:两种政治神学之间的文学辩论
这一章着眼于犹太研究中最著名和最重要的辩论之一:Gershom Scholem和Martin Buber之间关于哈西德主义特征的辩论。从表面上看,这场辩论是一场文学辩论,主要围绕哈西德派故事的意义及其在解读哈西德派运动中的作用展开。这是一场关于哈西德派的两个概念之间的辩论,一个是作为神学概念体系,另一个是作为一种生活方式。然而,这场辩论不仅是历史主义的,而且是时事和政治的。因为在这场辩论中,布伯和肖勒姆讨论了犹太人的主权问题,并努力确定犹太人与国家之间的理想关系。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
chapter 5. Jews, in Theory chapter 1. Leo Lowenthal and the Jewish Renaissance chapter 4. The Last Jewish Intellectual: Derrida and His Literary Betrayal of Levinas chapter 8. Old Testament Realism in the Writings of Erich Auerbach chapter 10. Against the “Attack on Linking”: Rearticulating the “Jewish Intellectual” for Today
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1