Performance Evaluation of Machine Learning Classifiers for Face Recognition

D. Sudiana, M. Rizkinia, Fahri Alamsyah
{"title":"Performance Evaluation of Machine Learning Classifiers for Face Recognition","authors":"D. Sudiana, M. Rizkinia, Fahri Alamsyah","doi":"10.1109/QIR54354.2021.9716171","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The digital world, especially image processing, has been evolving due to the needs of society and the importance of digital-based system security. One of the rapidly progressing technologies is the face recognition system using artificial intelligence. It recognizes a person’s face registered in the database for verification purposes. In this study, we evaluate the face recognition systems based on machine learning classifier algorithms and Principal Component Analysis (PCA) for feature extraction. Seven machine learning algorithms were considered, i.e., Support Vector Machine (SVM), Decision Tree, K-Nearest Neighbour (KNN), Logistic Regression, Naïve Bayes, Multi-Layer Perceptron (MLP), and Convolutional Neural network (CNN). In the CNN scenario, PCA was not used since it has its feature extraction capability. The first six classifiers were set to the most optimal settings. At the same time, CNN used the LeNet-5 architecture trained with a dropout rate of 0.25, 60 epochs, batch size of 20, Adam optimizer, and cross-categorical entropy for the loss function. The input image size was 64×64×1 obtained from the Olivetti faces database. CNN, SVM, and LR achieved the three highest accuracies, i.e., 98.75%, 98.75%, and 97.50%, respectively.","PeriodicalId":446396,"journal":{"name":"2021 17th International Conference on Quality in Research (QIR): International Symposium on Electrical and Computer Engineering","volume":"33 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-10-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2021 17th International Conference on Quality in Research (QIR): International Symposium on Electrical and Computer Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/QIR54354.2021.9716171","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The digital world, especially image processing, has been evolving due to the needs of society and the importance of digital-based system security. One of the rapidly progressing technologies is the face recognition system using artificial intelligence. It recognizes a person’s face registered in the database for verification purposes. In this study, we evaluate the face recognition systems based on machine learning classifier algorithms and Principal Component Analysis (PCA) for feature extraction. Seven machine learning algorithms were considered, i.e., Support Vector Machine (SVM), Decision Tree, K-Nearest Neighbour (KNN), Logistic Regression, Naïve Bayes, Multi-Layer Perceptron (MLP), and Convolutional Neural network (CNN). In the CNN scenario, PCA was not used since it has its feature extraction capability. The first six classifiers were set to the most optimal settings. At the same time, CNN used the LeNet-5 architecture trained with a dropout rate of 0.25, 60 epochs, batch size of 20, Adam optimizer, and cross-categorical entropy for the loss function. The input image size was 64×64×1 obtained from the Olivetti faces database. CNN, SVM, and LR achieved the three highest accuracies, i.e., 98.75%, 98.75%, and 97.50%, respectively.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
人脸识别中机器学习分类器的性能评价
由于社会的需求和基于数字的系统安全的重要性,数字世界,特别是图像处理一直在发展。快速发展的技术之一是使用人工智能的人脸识别系统。它识别在数据库中注册的人脸以进行验证。在本研究中,我们评估了基于机器学习分类器算法和主成分分析(PCA)特征提取的人脸识别系统。考虑了七种机器学习算法,即支持向量机(SVM),决策树,k近邻(KNN),逻辑回归,Naïve贝叶斯,多层感知器(MLP)和卷积神经网络(CNN)。在CNN场景中,没有使用PCA,因为PCA有自己的特征提取能力。将前六个分类器设置为最优设置。同时,CNN使用了丢弃率为0.25、epoch为60、batch size为20的LeNet-5架构、Adam优化器和cross-categorical entropy作为损失函数。输入的图像尺寸为64×64×1,取自Olivetti人脸数据库。CNN、SVM和LR的准确率最高,分别为98.75%、98.75%和97.50%。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Conference Schedule Automatic Essay Grading System for Japanese Language Exam using CNN-LSTM Design of Cross and Square Slot with Beamforming for Microstrip Reflectarray Antenna at 28 GHz Performance Analysis of YOLOv4 and SSD Mobilenet V2 for Foreign Object Debris (FOD) Detection at Airport Runway Using Custom Dataset Development of Greedy Power Allocation Round Robin Scheduling for 5.5G Traffic Management
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1