Policy-driven responsibility for innovations and organisational learning: an ethnographic study in additive manufacturing product innovations

Elena Sischarenco, Toni Luomaranta
{"title":"Policy-driven responsibility for innovations and organisational learning: an ethnographic study in additive manufacturing product innovations","authors":"Elena Sischarenco, Toni Luomaranta","doi":"10.1108/tlo-11-2021-0132","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\nPurpose\nPolicy-oriented responsibility initiatives are institutional attempts to make innovations more responsible. One such initiative is offered by the European Commission’s responsible research and innovation (RRI) keys (public engagement, gender equality, science education, open access and ethics). This study is conducted in the context of an EU Horizon 2020 project and focuses on the introduction of RRI keys to innovation projects of the additive manufacturing (AM) industry. This study aims to understand how these RRI keys are perceived and adopted by industry project partners.\n\n\nDesign/methodology/approach\nThe authors use an ethnographic study based on “participant observation”, supported by interviews and workshops with AM industry experts. In particular, the analysis covers two specific innovation use cases – one in the medical field, and second in the automotive field, in the context of the EU project. The analysis, based on ethnographic data, is inductive and interpretative.\n\n\nFindings\nThe authors take a critical approach towards the implementation of RRI policy keys as measurable indicators, and argue that they are not easy tools to implement. The authors portray how RRI keys were understood and welcomed by industrial organisations, and how their implementation raised controversies. The authors also found that RRI keys are difficult to understand. They are not easy to measure and report, and this contrasts with earlier proposals of how RRI keys should be governed or implemented. The governance, meaning the dialogue between stakeholders both internal and external to the organisation, was time-consuming and required constant organisational learning.\n\n\nOriginality/value\nDue to the insightful ethnographic methodology, the authors could well underline the faults and difficulties of the application of policy-oriented responsibility in innovation. The findings illustrate the difficulty of implementing RRI in an industry that mainly operates business-to-business. This can help future policymakers to find more successful ways of pushing industry and innovators to be more responsible. It can also suggest better ways of reaching higher organisational learning for the purpose of more responsible innovations.\n","PeriodicalId":365387,"journal":{"name":"The Learning Organization","volume":"5 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Learning Organization","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/tlo-11-2021-0132","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Purpose Policy-oriented responsibility initiatives are institutional attempts to make innovations more responsible. One such initiative is offered by the European Commission’s responsible research and innovation (RRI) keys (public engagement, gender equality, science education, open access and ethics). This study is conducted in the context of an EU Horizon 2020 project and focuses on the introduction of RRI keys to innovation projects of the additive manufacturing (AM) industry. This study aims to understand how these RRI keys are perceived and adopted by industry project partners. Design/methodology/approach The authors use an ethnographic study based on “participant observation”, supported by interviews and workshops with AM industry experts. In particular, the analysis covers two specific innovation use cases – one in the medical field, and second in the automotive field, in the context of the EU project. The analysis, based on ethnographic data, is inductive and interpretative. Findings The authors take a critical approach towards the implementation of RRI policy keys as measurable indicators, and argue that they are not easy tools to implement. The authors portray how RRI keys were understood and welcomed by industrial organisations, and how their implementation raised controversies. The authors also found that RRI keys are difficult to understand. They are not easy to measure and report, and this contrasts with earlier proposals of how RRI keys should be governed or implemented. The governance, meaning the dialogue between stakeholders both internal and external to the organisation, was time-consuming and required constant organisational learning. Originality/value Due to the insightful ethnographic methodology, the authors could well underline the faults and difficulties of the application of policy-oriented responsibility in innovation. The findings illustrate the difficulty of implementing RRI in an industry that mainly operates business-to-business. This can help future policymakers to find more successful ways of pushing industry and innovators to be more responsible. It can also suggest better ways of reaching higher organisational learning for the purpose of more responsible innovations.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
政策驱动的创新责任和组织学习:增材制造产品创新的民族志研究
目的政策导向的责任倡议是使创新更负责任的制度尝试。其中一项倡议是由欧盟委员会负责任的研究与创新(RRI)重点(公众参与、性别平等、科学教育、开放获取和道德)提出的。本研究是在欧盟地平线2020项目的背景下进行的,重点是在增材制造(AM)行业的创新项目中引入RRI关键。本研究旨在了解这些RRI键是如何被行业项目合作伙伴感知和采用的。设计/方法/方法作者采用了一种基于“参与式观察”的民族志研究,并与增材制造行业专家进行了访谈和研讨会。特别是,分析涵盖了两个具体的创新用例——一个在医疗领域,第二个在汽车领域,在欧盟项目的背景下。基于民族志数据的分析是归纳性和解释性的。研究结果:作者对RRI政策关键字作为可衡量指标的实施采取了一种批判性的方法,并认为它们不是容易实施的工具。作者描述了工业组织是如何理解和欢迎RRI密钥的,以及它们的实施是如何引起争议的。作者还发现,RRI键很难理解。它们不容易度量和报告,这与早期关于如何治理或实现RRI密钥的建议形成了对比。治理,意味着组织内部和外部利益相关者之间的对话,是耗时的,需要不断的组织学习。独创性/价值由于具有深刻见解的民族志方法论,作者可以很好地强调政策导向责任在创新中应用的缺陷和困难。研究结果表明,在一个主要经营企业对企业的行业实施RRI的难度。这可以帮助未来的政策制定者找到更成功的方法,推动行业和创新者更负责任。它还可以为更负责任的创新提供更好的方法,以达到更高的组织学习。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
How digital applications can facilitate knowledge sharing in health care Navigating the gig economy in Romania: unveiling perceptions of working on on-demand platforms Support and connect employees to facilitate learning Responsible learning organizations: a framework to embed responsible innovation within organizations An egalitarian talent selection model to support learning organizations
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1