Rethinking MAC Clauses in the Time of Akorn, Boston Scientific, and COVID-19

Samuel Shapiro
{"title":"Rethinking MAC Clauses in the Time of Akorn, Boston Scientific, and COVID-19","authors":"Samuel Shapiro","doi":"10.36639/mbelr.10.2.rethinking","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The MAC clause is perhaps the most important clause in contract law, giving acquirers the ability to terminate even the largest agreements in the face of an often vaguely defined “Material Adverse Change.” For decades, even though MAC clauses have been present in nearly every merger agreement, courts have almost universally refused to enforce them. But the Delaware Chancery Court’s 2018 decision in Akorn may finally change that. As the world deals with the economic uncertainty caused by COVID-19, courts may soon get more opportunities to decide whether or not they will follow Akorn’s lead and begin to allow companies to exit agreements. In this Article, I argue that they should.","PeriodicalId":177599,"journal":{"name":"Michigan Business & Entrepreneurial Law Review","volume":"5 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Michigan Business & Entrepreneurial Law Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.36639/mbelr.10.2.rethinking","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

The MAC clause is perhaps the most important clause in contract law, giving acquirers the ability to terminate even the largest agreements in the face of an often vaguely defined “Material Adverse Change.” For decades, even though MAC clauses have been present in nearly every merger agreement, courts have almost universally refused to enforce them. But the Delaware Chancery Court’s 2018 decision in Akorn may finally change that. As the world deals with the economic uncertainty caused by COVID-19, courts may soon get more opportunities to decide whether or not they will follow Akorn’s lead and begin to allow companies to exit agreements. In this Article, I argue that they should.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
在Akorn, Boston Scientific和COVID-19时代重新思考MAC条款
MAC条款可能是合同法中最重要的条款,它赋予收购方在面对通常定义模糊的“重大不利变化”时终止甚至是最大协议的能力。几十年来,尽管几乎所有并购协议中都有MAC条款,但法院几乎普遍拒绝执行这些条款。但特拉华州衡平法院2018年在阿肯的裁决可能最终会改变这一点。随着全球应对新冠肺炎造成的经济不确定性,法院可能很快就会有更多机会决定是否效仿Akorn,开始允许企业退出协议。在本文中,我认为他们应该这样做。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The Hague Rules on Third-Party Joinder: A Revised Framework Unintentional Irony in Landmark Decisions of the Delaware Supreme Court Regarding Corporate Law The Suitability of South Africa's Business Rescue Procedure in the Reorganization of Small-to-Medium-Sized Enterprises: Lessons from Chapter 11 of the United States Bankruptcy Code. In Whose Interests Should a Company be Run? Fiduciary Duties of Directors During Corporate Failure in India: Looking to the West for Answers Crafting a Corporate Analogue to Criminal Disenfranchisement
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1