Consensus

R. V. Renesse
{"title":"Consensus","authors":"R. V. Renesse","doi":"10.1177/00034894880970s211","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objectives: to study the specific features of the symptomatic effect and tolerability of paracetamol (P), glucosamine sulfate (GS), chondroitin sulfate (CS), and meloxicam (M) in patients with knee osteoarthritis (OA). Methods: An 18-month open-label randomized prospective parallel-group trial enrolled 80 patients with knee OA who fulfilled the American College of Rheumatology criteria and signed the informed consent. They had Kellgren and Lawrence grades I-III OA with visual analogue scale pain intensity of > 40mm in the target knee, a body mass index of < 35 rg/m 2 , and no clinical dysfunctions of vital organs and systems. The patients were randomized into 4 groups: 1) P 2g daily; 2) a standard GS regimen; 3) a standard CS regimen; 4) M 15mg daily. The patients were followed up for 18 months, The effectiveness was evaluated by the WOMAC questionnaire, Lequesne index, and OMER-ACT-OARSI (D scenario) during 8 visits. Laboratory and clinical examination as well as electrocardiography were performed. Adverse events were recorded during each visit. Results: After 4 weeks of treatment, symptomatic improvement was noted in all groups; however, the best effect was achieved by the use of M and continued to the end of the study. The percentage of patients reacting to the therapy by the OMERACT-OARSI criteria was highest in M group (100%), reached 90% in GS, 85% in CS groups and 75% in P group. In the groups of P, GS and CS failed to respond to treatment 25, 10, and 15% correspondingly. However, medium narrowing of articular space (NAS) was measured at the end of the study and was significantly lower in GS group (-0.07; p=0,","PeriodicalId":309688,"journal":{"name":"Foundations for Fintech","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"10","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Foundations for Fintech","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/00034894880970s211","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 10

Abstract

Objectives: to study the specific features of the symptomatic effect and tolerability of paracetamol (P), glucosamine sulfate (GS), chondroitin sulfate (CS), and meloxicam (M) in patients with knee osteoarthritis (OA). Methods: An 18-month open-label randomized prospective parallel-group trial enrolled 80 patients with knee OA who fulfilled the American College of Rheumatology criteria and signed the informed consent. They had Kellgren and Lawrence grades I-III OA with visual analogue scale pain intensity of > 40mm in the target knee, a body mass index of < 35 rg/m 2 , and no clinical dysfunctions of vital organs and systems. The patients were randomized into 4 groups: 1) P 2g daily; 2) a standard GS regimen; 3) a standard CS regimen; 4) M 15mg daily. The patients were followed up for 18 months, The effectiveness was evaluated by the WOMAC questionnaire, Lequesne index, and OMER-ACT-OARSI (D scenario) during 8 visits. Laboratory and clinical examination as well as electrocardiography were performed. Adverse events were recorded during each visit. Results: After 4 weeks of treatment, symptomatic improvement was noted in all groups; however, the best effect was achieved by the use of M and continued to the end of the study. The percentage of patients reacting to the therapy by the OMERACT-OARSI criteria was highest in M group (100%), reached 90% in GS, 85% in CS groups and 75% in P group. In the groups of P, GS and CS failed to respond to treatment 25, 10, and 15% correspondingly. However, medium narrowing of articular space (NAS) was measured at the end of the study and was significantly lower in GS group (-0.07; p=0,
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
共识
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Fintech and Financial Inclusion Ethics and Governance Sampling and Estimation Boolean Algebra and Logic Gates Emerging Technologies
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1