Sociotechnical Considerations for Accessible Visualization Design

Alan Lundgard, Crystal Lee, Arvind Satyanarayan
{"title":"Sociotechnical Considerations for Accessible Visualization Design","authors":"Alan Lundgard, Crystal Lee, Arvind Satyanarayan","doi":"10.1109/VISUAL.2019.8933762","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Accessibility—the process of designing for people with disabilities (PWD)—is an important but under-explored challenge in the visualization research community. Without careful attention, and if PWD are not included as equal participants throughout the process, there is a danger of perpetuating a vision-first approach to accessible design that marginalizes the lived experience of disability (e.g., by creating overly simplistic \"sensory translations\" that map visual to non-visual modalities in a one-to-one fashion). In this paper, we present a set of sociotechnical considerations for research in accessible visualization design, drawing on literature in disability studies, tactile information systems, and participatory methods. We identify that using state-of-the-art technologies may introduce more barriers to access than they remove, and that expectations of research novelty may not produce outcomes well-aligned with the needs of disability communities. Instead, to promote a more inclusive design process, we emphasize the importance of clearly communicating goals, following existing accessibility guidelines, and treating PWD as equal participants who are compensated for their specialized skills. To illustrate how these considerations can be applied in practice, we discuss a case study of an inclusive design workshop held in collaboration with the Perkins School for the Blind.","PeriodicalId":192801,"journal":{"name":"2019 IEEE Visualization Conference (VIS)","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-09-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"46","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2019 IEEE Visualization Conference (VIS)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/VISUAL.2019.8933762","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 46

Abstract

Accessibility—the process of designing for people with disabilities (PWD)—is an important but under-explored challenge in the visualization research community. Without careful attention, and if PWD are not included as equal participants throughout the process, there is a danger of perpetuating a vision-first approach to accessible design that marginalizes the lived experience of disability (e.g., by creating overly simplistic "sensory translations" that map visual to non-visual modalities in a one-to-one fashion). In this paper, we present a set of sociotechnical considerations for research in accessible visualization design, drawing on literature in disability studies, tactile information systems, and participatory methods. We identify that using state-of-the-art technologies may introduce more barriers to access than they remove, and that expectations of research novelty may not produce outcomes well-aligned with the needs of disability communities. Instead, to promote a more inclusive design process, we emphasize the importance of clearly communicating goals, following existing accessibility guidelines, and treating PWD as equal participants who are compensated for their specialized skills. To illustrate how these considerations can be applied in practice, we discuss a case study of an inclusive design workshop held in collaboration with the Perkins School for the Blind.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
无障碍可视化设计的社会技术考虑
可访问性——为残疾人(PWD)设计的过程——是可视化研究界一个重要但未被充分探索的挑战。如果没有仔细的关注,如果残疾人在整个过程中没有作为平等的参与者被包括在内,那么在无障碍设计中,视觉优先的方法将会存在一种危险,这种方法将残疾人的生活经验边缘化(例如,通过创建过于简单的“感官翻译”,以一对一的方式将视觉模式映射到非视觉模式)。在本文中,我们提出了一套无障碍可视化设计研究的社会技术考虑,借鉴了残疾研究、触觉信息系统和参与式方法方面的文献。我们发现,使用最先进的技术可能会给获取带来更多的障碍,而不是消除障碍,而且对研究新颖性的期望可能不会产生与残疾人社区需求完全一致的结果。相反,为了促进更具包容性的设计过程,我们强调明确沟通目标的重要性,遵循现有的无障碍指南,并将残疾人视为平等的参与者,他们的专业技能得到了补偿。为了说明这些考虑如何应用于实践,我们讨论了一个与珀金斯盲人学校合作举办的包容性设计研讨会的案例研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
EasyPZ.js: Interaction Binding for Pan and Zoom Visualizations Uncovering Data Landscapes through Data Reconnaissance and Task Wrangling Disentangled Representation of Data Distributions in Scatterplots RuleVis: Constructing Patterns and Rules for Rule-Based Models Interactive Bicluster Aggregation in Bipartite Graphs
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1