Leveraging Who You Know by What You Know: Specialization and Returns to Relational Capital

Heejung Byun, J. Frake, Rajshree Agarwal
{"title":"Leveraging Who You Know by What You Know: Specialization and Returns to Relational Capital","authors":"Heejung Byun, J. Frake, Rajshree Agarwal","doi":"10.1002/SMJ.2790","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Research Summary: This paper investigates the interaction effects of specialization and relational capital on performance. We distinguish between upstream and downstream relational capital and theorize that higher levels of specialization will buffer against decreases in upstream relational capital, because of deeper domain expertise and stronger downstream relational capital. Conversely, higher levels of generalization permit greater gains from increases in upstream relational capital, due to leverage across a more diversified downstream portfolio of activities. We test and find support for these hypotheses in the context of the US lobbying industry. Our study contributes to the strategic human capital literature by isolating the dimension of specialization and relational capital embodied within individuals and providing performance implications of the interactions. Managerial Summary: Both “what you know” and “whom you know” impacts performance. Generalists and specialists are different on the “what you know” dimension. On the “who you know” dimension, we distinguish between upstream (supplier) and downstream (client) relationships. We show that specialists are buffered by deeper downstream relations from performance declines when their powerful upstream connections lose power. Generalists benefit from broader networks when their upstream connections gain power. Thus, when the value of their relationships change, specialists and generalists should each assess when they can reap performance benefits, and when they need to bolster against adversities. For firms, our study suggests hiring the right mix of specialists and generalists is important to reduce risks from relational losses while enjoying the performance benefits from relational gains.","PeriodicalId":325993,"journal":{"name":"Ewing Marion Kauffman Foundation Research Paper Series","volume":"24 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-01-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"42","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ewing Marion Kauffman Foundation Research Paper Series","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/SMJ.2790","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 42

Abstract

Research Summary: This paper investigates the interaction effects of specialization and relational capital on performance. We distinguish between upstream and downstream relational capital and theorize that higher levels of specialization will buffer against decreases in upstream relational capital, because of deeper domain expertise and stronger downstream relational capital. Conversely, higher levels of generalization permit greater gains from increases in upstream relational capital, due to leverage across a more diversified downstream portfolio of activities. We test and find support for these hypotheses in the context of the US lobbying industry. Our study contributes to the strategic human capital literature by isolating the dimension of specialization and relational capital embodied within individuals and providing performance implications of the interactions. Managerial Summary: Both “what you know” and “whom you know” impacts performance. Generalists and specialists are different on the “what you know” dimension. On the “who you know” dimension, we distinguish between upstream (supplier) and downstream (client) relationships. We show that specialists are buffered by deeper downstream relations from performance declines when their powerful upstream connections lose power. Generalists benefit from broader networks when their upstream connections gain power. Thus, when the value of their relationships change, specialists and generalists should each assess when they can reap performance benefits, and when they need to bolster against adversities. For firms, our study suggests hiring the right mix of specialists and generalists is important to reduce risks from relational losses while enjoying the performance benefits from relational gains.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
利用你所知道的:专业化和关系资本的回报
研究总结:本文主要研究专业化和关系资本对企业绩效的交互影响。我们区分了上游和下游关系资本,并提出了更高水平的专业化将缓冲上游关系资本的减少的理论,因为更深的领域专业知识和更强的下游关系资本。相反,更高的泛化水平允许从上游关系资本的增加中获得更大的收益,这是由于跨更多样化的下游活动组合的杠杆作用。我们在美国游说行业的背景下对这些假设进行了测试并找到了支持。我们的研究通过分离专业化维度和个体内部体现的关系资本,并提供相互作用的绩效含义,为战略人力资本文献做出了贡献。管理总结:“你知道什么”和“你认识谁”都会影响绩效。通才和专才在“你知道什么”这个维度上是不同的。在“你认识谁”的维度上,我们区分了上游(供应商)和下游(客户)关系。我们表明,当专家强大的上游关系失去权力时,他们的业绩下降会受到更深层下游关系的缓冲。当通才的上游网络获得力量时,他们就会从更广泛的网络中获益。因此,当他们关系的价值发生变化时,专家和通才都应该评估他们何时可以获得绩效收益,何时需要支持以应对逆境。对于公司来说,我们的研究表明,雇用合适的专家和通才组合对于减少关系损失的风险,同时享受关系收益带来的绩效收益非常重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Racial Disparities in Access to Small Business Credit: Evidence from the Paycheck Protection Program The Governance of Corporate Culture Big Data Directions in Entrepreneurship Research: Researcher Viewpoints Redesigning the Longitudinal Business Database How is Covid Changing the Geography of Entrepreneurship? Evidence from the Startup Cartography Project
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1