ROSACEAE: ROSE FAMILY

R. Spellenberg, C. Earle, G. Nelson
{"title":"ROSACEAE: ROSE FAMILY","authors":"R. Spellenberg, C. Earle, G. Nelson","doi":"10.1515/9781400851850.402","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"the design of complex sociotechnical systems was primarily known as cognitive engineering or cognitive systems engineering (CSE), a term introduced in the 1980s to denote an emerging branch of applied cognitive psychology. 1,2 Research focused on such topics as human–computer interaction , the psychology of programming, display design, and user friendliness. Although some have sought to make the term cognitive engineering seem less of an oxymoron by doing work that somehow looks like actual engineering, a number of new terms have emerged, all of which might be considered members of the \" genus \" Human-Centered Computing. Researchers, research organizations, funding sources, national study groups and working groups, and even entire national funding programs espouse these approaches. A number of varieties have entered the judging competition, as the \" acronym soup \" in Figure 1 shows. This variety has come about for many reasons. Some individuals have proposed terms to express views that they believe are new. Others have proposed terms as a consequence of the social and competitive nature of science and science funding, leading to turf wars and the need for individuals to win awards and claim niches that set themselves and their ideas apart from the crowd. The obvious, and obviously incorrect, question is, \" Which term is the right one? \" As we hope to suggest in this essay, this question is rather like the quest for the blue rose. Using the rose metaphor , and taking some liberties with Latin, we organize the essay around a set of \" genuses \" into which the individual \" varieties \" seem to fall. Rosaceae: The rose family Traditionum: The act of handing over Contrarium: Opposite or contrast This genus includes those varieties that express a reaction against some less desirable alternative, often left un-named (we will make up names to fill the voids). A proposed umbrella term is Human-Centered Systems, which people have used to denote • Programs of college study—for example, at Cornell University 3 The rose is a rose, And was always a rose. But the theory now goes That the apple's a rose, And the pear is, and so's The plum, I suppose. The dear only knows What will next prove a rose. You, of course, are a rose— But were always a rose. \" The Rose Family, \" Robert Frost, 1928 I n this essay, we concern ourselves with characterizations of the \" new …","PeriodicalId":371557,"journal":{"name":"The Jepson Manual","volume":"25 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2014-01-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Jepson Manual","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1515/9781400851850.402","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

the design of complex sociotechnical systems was primarily known as cognitive engineering or cognitive systems engineering (CSE), a term introduced in the 1980s to denote an emerging branch of applied cognitive psychology. 1,2 Research focused on such topics as human–computer interaction , the psychology of programming, display design, and user friendliness. Although some have sought to make the term cognitive engineering seem less of an oxymoron by doing work that somehow looks like actual engineering, a number of new terms have emerged, all of which might be considered members of the " genus " Human-Centered Computing. Researchers, research organizations, funding sources, national study groups and working groups, and even entire national funding programs espouse these approaches. A number of varieties have entered the judging competition, as the " acronym soup " in Figure 1 shows. This variety has come about for many reasons. Some individuals have proposed terms to express views that they believe are new. Others have proposed terms as a consequence of the social and competitive nature of science and science funding, leading to turf wars and the need for individuals to win awards and claim niches that set themselves and their ideas apart from the crowd. The obvious, and obviously incorrect, question is, " Which term is the right one? " As we hope to suggest in this essay, this question is rather like the quest for the blue rose. Using the rose metaphor , and taking some liberties with Latin, we organize the essay around a set of " genuses " into which the individual " varieties " seem to fall. Rosaceae: The rose family Traditionum: The act of handing over Contrarium: Opposite or contrast This genus includes those varieties that express a reaction against some less desirable alternative, often left un-named (we will make up names to fill the voids). A proposed umbrella term is Human-Centered Systems, which people have used to denote • Programs of college study—for example, at Cornell University 3 The rose is a rose, And was always a rose. But the theory now goes That the apple's a rose, And the pear is, and so's The plum, I suppose. The dear only knows What will next prove a rose. You, of course, are a rose— But were always a rose. " The Rose Family, " Robert Frost, 1928 I n this essay, we concern ourselves with characterizations of the " new …
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
蔷薇科:蔷薇科
复杂社会技术系统的设计最初被称为认知工程或认知系统工程(CSE),这是一个在20世纪80年代引入的术语,用于表示应用认知心理学的一个新兴分支。1,2研究集中在人机交互、编程心理学、显示设计和用户友好性等主题上。尽管有些人试图通过做一些看起来像实际工程的工作来使“认知工程”这个术语看起来不那么矛盾,但已经出现了一些新的术语,所有这些术语都可以被认为是“以人为中心的计算”“属”的成员。研究人员、研究机构、资金来源、国家研究小组和工作组,甚至整个国家资助计划都支持这些方法。许多品种已经参加了评审比赛,如图1所示的“缩略词汤”。这种变化的产生有很多原因。一些人提出了一些术语来表达他们认为是新的观点。另一些人提出的术语是由于科学和科学资助的社会和竞争性质,导致了地盘之争,以及个人需要赢得奖项和主张使自己和自己的想法与人群区分开来的利基。最明显的问题是,“哪个词是正确的?”正如我们希望在这篇文章中提出的那样,这个问题很像对蓝玫瑰的追求。我们使用玫瑰的比喻,并随意使用拉丁语,围绕一组“属”来组织这篇文章,这些“属”似乎属于个别的“变种”。玫瑰科:玫瑰科:交出的行为:相反的或对比这个属包括那些表达对一些不太理想的替代品的反应的品种,通常没有命名(我们将编造名字来填补空白)。一个被提议的总括性术语是“以人为中心的系统”,人们用它来表示大学学习的项目——例如,在康奈尔大学,玫瑰就是玫瑰,而且一直是玫瑰。但现在的理论是苹果是玫瑰,梨子是,李子也是,我想。亲爱的人只知道下一朵玫瑰花会变成什么样子。你当然是一朵玫瑰——但我们一直都是一朵玫瑰。”《玫瑰家族》,罗伯特·弗罗斯特,1928年在这篇文章中,我们关注的是“新……
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
SOLANACEAE: NIGHTSHADE FAMILY MYRTACEAE: MYRTLE FAMILY PASSIFLORACEAE: PASSION FLOWER FAMILY STAPHYLEACEAE: BLADDERNUT FAMILY CERATOPHYLLALES
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1