Perception about Activities for Muscular Fitness Improvement and its Intergenerational Difference in Japanese Adults

K. Harada, K. Oka, Yoshio Nakamura
{"title":"Perception about Activities for Muscular Fitness Improvement and its Intergenerational Difference in Japanese Adults","authors":"K. Harada, K. Oka, Yoshio Nakamura","doi":"10.5432/IJSHS.IJSHS20080337","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The present study identified what kinds of activities Japanese adults perceived as activities for muscular fitness improvement and examined the relationship between age and the perception about such activities. The sample was 1,636 Japanese adults (40.2±12.2years) collected from the registrants of a Japanese social research company. The study design was cross-sectional study using an internet questionnaire. The respondents selected all activities which they perceived as activities for muscular fitness improvement from 14 activities: push-ups, sit-ups, cleaning room, swimming, playing with child, going up and down stairs and slope, yoga, machines exercise, dumbbells exercise, stretching exercise, squat, jogging, rubber bands and tubes exercise, and walking. A chi-square test was utilized for examining the association between the perception and age groups. More than half of respondents treated sit-ups (82.1%), push-ups (72.3%), dumbbells exercise (66.4%), machines exercise (62.1%), squat (58.2%), rubber bands and tubes exercise (55.7%), and swimming (55.6%) as activities for muscular fitness improvement. On the other hand, 30-49% of them also perceived going up and down stairs and slope (46.7%), walking (32.5%), stretching exercise (31.7%), and jogging (30.4%) asactivities for muscular fitness improvement. Compared with younger people, older people were more likely to perceive walking and going up and down stairs and slopes as activities for muscular fitness improvement (p<0.05). It was concluded that the perception of activities for muscular fitness improvement in Japanese adults would be different from the activities for muscular fitness improvement recommended by current guidelines of the American College of Sports Medicine and the Japanese Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare.","PeriodicalId":341890,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Sport and Health Science","volume":"78 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2009-12-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Sport and Health Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5432/IJSHS.IJSHS20080337","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The present study identified what kinds of activities Japanese adults perceived as activities for muscular fitness improvement and examined the relationship between age and the perception about such activities. The sample was 1,636 Japanese adults (40.2±12.2years) collected from the registrants of a Japanese social research company. The study design was cross-sectional study using an internet questionnaire. The respondents selected all activities which they perceived as activities for muscular fitness improvement from 14 activities: push-ups, sit-ups, cleaning room, swimming, playing with child, going up and down stairs and slope, yoga, machines exercise, dumbbells exercise, stretching exercise, squat, jogging, rubber bands and tubes exercise, and walking. A chi-square test was utilized for examining the association between the perception and age groups. More than half of respondents treated sit-ups (82.1%), push-ups (72.3%), dumbbells exercise (66.4%), machines exercise (62.1%), squat (58.2%), rubber bands and tubes exercise (55.7%), and swimming (55.6%) as activities for muscular fitness improvement. On the other hand, 30-49% of them also perceived going up and down stairs and slope (46.7%), walking (32.5%), stretching exercise (31.7%), and jogging (30.4%) asactivities for muscular fitness improvement. Compared with younger people, older people were more likely to perceive walking and going up and down stairs and slopes as activities for muscular fitness improvement (p<0.05). It was concluded that the perception of activities for muscular fitness improvement in Japanese adults would be different from the activities for muscular fitness improvement recommended by current guidelines of the American College of Sports Medicine and the Japanese Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
日本成年人对改善肌肉健康活动的认知及其代际差异
本研究确定了日本成年人认为可以改善肌肉健康的活动类型,并考察了年龄与对此类活动的看法之间的关系。样本是1636名日本成年人(40.2±12.2岁),来自一家日本社会研究公司的注册者。研究设计为横断面研究,采用网络问卷。受访者从俯卧撑、仰卧起坐、打扫房间、游泳、和孩子玩耍、上下楼梯和斜坡、瑜伽、器械运动、哑铃运动、伸展运动、深蹲、慢跑、橡皮筋和管子运动、散步等14项活动中选择了他们认为可以改善肌肉健康的所有活动。使用卡方检验来检验感知与年龄组之间的关联。超过一半的受访者认为仰卧起坐(82.1%)、俯卧撑(72.3%)、哑铃运动(66.4%)、器械运动(62.1%)、深蹲(58.2%)、橡皮筋和管子运动(55.7%)和游泳(55.6%)是改善肌肉健康的活动。另一方面,30-49%的人认为上下楼梯和斜坡(46.7%)、散步(32.5%)、伸展运动(31.7%)和慢跑(30.4%)是改善肌肉健康的活动。与年轻人相比,老年人更倾向于认为步行、上下楼梯和斜坡是改善肌肉健康的活动(p<0.05)。结论是,日本成年人对改善肌肉健康活动的看法与美国运动医学学院和日本卫生、劳动和福利部现行指导方针推荐的改善肌肉健康活动不同。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Japanese health and physical education teachers' experiences in sexuality education of secondary education Changes in lumbopelvic motion and trunk muscle activity during 2000 m rowing ergometer trial Ultrasound Derived Measurements Ability to Predict Max Aerobic Performance Event Satisfaction and Life Satisfaction among Long-distance Runners The Problem of “Losing Games on Purpose”: With Reference to Discussions Concerning “Failed Athletic Contests”*
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1