Reworking the political in digital forests: The cosmopolitics of socio-technical worlds

Jennifer Gabrys, Michelle Westerlaken, Danilo Urzedo, Max Ritts, Trishant Simlai
{"title":"Reworking the political in digital forests: The cosmopolitics of socio-technical worlds","authors":"Jennifer Gabrys, Michelle Westerlaken, Danilo Urzedo, Max Ritts, Trishant Simlai","doi":"10.1177/27539687221117836","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Forests are increasingly central to policies and initiatives to address global environmental change. Digital technologies have become crucial components of these projects as the tools and systems that would monitor and manage forests for storing carbon, preserving biodiversity, and providing ecosystem services. Historically, technologies have been instrumental in forming forests as spaces of conservation, extraction, and inhabitation. Digital technologies build on previous techniques of forest management, which have been shaped by colonial governance, expert science, and economic growth. However, digital technologies for achieving environmental initiatives can also extend, transform, and disrupt these sedimented practices. This article asks how the convergence of forests and digital technologies gives rise to different socio-technical formations and modalities of “political forests.” Through an analysis of five digital operations, including 1) observation, 2) datafication, 3) participation, 4) automation, and 5) regulation and transformation, we investigate how the co-constitution of forests, technologies, subjects, and social life creates distinct materializations of politics–and cosmopolitics. By building on and expanding the concept of cosmopolitics, we query how the political is designated through digital forest projects and how it might be reworked to generate less extractive environmental practices and relations while contributing to more just and pluralistic forest worlds.","PeriodicalId":196693,"journal":{"name":"Progress in Environmental Geography","volume":"31 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-08-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"8","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Progress in Environmental Geography","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/27539687221117836","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 8

Abstract

Forests are increasingly central to policies and initiatives to address global environmental change. Digital technologies have become crucial components of these projects as the tools and systems that would monitor and manage forests for storing carbon, preserving biodiversity, and providing ecosystem services. Historically, technologies have been instrumental in forming forests as spaces of conservation, extraction, and inhabitation. Digital technologies build on previous techniques of forest management, which have been shaped by colonial governance, expert science, and economic growth. However, digital technologies for achieving environmental initiatives can also extend, transform, and disrupt these sedimented practices. This article asks how the convergence of forests and digital technologies gives rise to different socio-technical formations and modalities of “political forests.” Through an analysis of five digital operations, including 1) observation, 2) datafication, 3) participation, 4) automation, and 5) regulation and transformation, we investigate how the co-constitution of forests, technologies, subjects, and social life creates distinct materializations of politics–and cosmopolitics. By building on and expanding the concept of cosmopolitics, we query how the political is designated through digital forest projects and how it might be reworked to generate less extractive environmental practices and relations while contributing to more just and pluralistic forest worlds.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
重塑数字森林中的政治:社会技术世界的世界政治
森林在应对全球环境变化的政策和倡议中日益发挥核心作用。数字技术已成为这些项目的重要组成部分,作为监测和管理森林储存碳、保护生物多样性和提供生态系统服务的工具和系统。从历史上看,技术在形成森林作为保护、采伐和居住空间方面发挥了重要作用。数字技术建立在以前的森林管理技术的基础上,这些技术受到殖民统治、专家科学和经济增长的影响。然而,实现环境倡议的数字技术也可以扩展、改变和破坏这些积淀的做法。本文探讨森林与数位技术的融合如何产生不同的社会技术形态与“政治森林”模式。通过对五种数字化操作(1)观察、2)数据化、3)参与、4)自动化和5)监管与转型)的分析,我们探讨了森林、技术、主体和社会生活的共同构成如何创造出政治和世界政治的不同物化。通过建立和扩展世界政治的概念,我们质疑如何通过数字森林项目来指定政治,以及如何重新设计政治,以产生更少的采开性环境实践和关系,同时为更公正和多元化的森林世界做出贡献。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Assemblage thinking and actor–network theory: Reconciling the perspectives of environmental security and political ecology for improving the understanding of farmer–herder conflicts in Africa Modernity's Antillean ecologies: Dispossession, disasters, justice, and repair across the Caribbean archipelago Between monitoring and surveillance: Geographies of emerging drone technologies in contemporary conservation Between monitoring and surveillance: Geographies of emerging drone technologies in contemporary conservation Geographies of the pollinator commons
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1