{"title":"The 21st Century Singularity and its Big History Implications: A re-analysis","authors":"Andrey Korotayev","doi":"10.22339/JBH.V2I3.2329","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The idea that in the near future we should expect “the Singularity” has become quite popular recently, primarily thanks to the activities of Google technical director in the field of machine training Raymond Kurzweil and his book The Singularity Is Near (2005). It is shown that the mathematical analysis of the series of events (described by Kurzweil in his famous book), which starts with the emergence of our Galaxy and ends with the decoding of the DNA code, is indeed ideally described by an extremely simple mathematical function (not known to Kurzweil himself) with a singularity in the region of 2029. It is also shown that, a similar time series (beginning with the onset of life on Earth and ending with the information revolution – composed by the Russian physicist Alexander Panov completely independently of Kurzweil) is also practically perfectly described by a mathematical function (very similar to the above and not used by Panov) with a singularity in the region of 2027. It is shown that this function is also extremely similar to the equation discovered in 1960 by Heinz von Foerster and published in his famous article in the journal “Science” – this function almost perfectly describes the dynamics of the world population and is characterized by a mathematical singularity in the region of 2027. All this indicates the existence of sufficiently rigorous global macroevolutionary regularities (describing the evolution of complexity on our planet for a few billion of years), which can be surprisingly accurately described by extremely simple mathematical functions. At the same time it is demonstrated that in the region of the singularity point there is no reason, after Kurzweil, to expect an unprecedented (many orders of magnitude) acceleration of the rates of technological development. There are more grounds for interpreting this point as an indication of an inflection point, after which the pace of global evolution will begin to slow down systematically in the long term.","PeriodicalId":326067,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Big History","volume":"14 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-06-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"23","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Big History","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22339/JBH.V2I3.2329","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 23
Abstract
The idea that in the near future we should expect “the Singularity” has become quite popular recently, primarily thanks to the activities of Google technical director in the field of machine training Raymond Kurzweil and his book The Singularity Is Near (2005). It is shown that the mathematical analysis of the series of events (described by Kurzweil in his famous book), which starts with the emergence of our Galaxy and ends with the decoding of the DNA code, is indeed ideally described by an extremely simple mathematical function (not known to Kurzweil himself) with a singularity in the region of 2029. It is also shown that, a similar time series (beginning with the onset of life on Earth and ending with the information revolution – composed by the Russian physicist Alexander Panov completely independently of Kurzweil) is also practically perfectly described by a mathematical function (very similar to the above and not used by Panov) with a singularity in the region of 2027. It is shown that this function is also extremely similar to the equation discovered in 1960 by Heinz von Foerster and published in his famous article in the journal “Science” – this function almost perfectly describes the dynamics of the world population and is characterized by a mathematical singularity in the region of 2027. All this indicates the existence of sufficiently rigorous global macroevolutionary regularities (describing the evolution of complexity on our planet for a few billion of years), which can be surprisingly accurately described by extremely simple mathematical functions. At the same time it is demonstrated that in the region of the singularity point there is no reason, after Kurzweil, to expect an unprecedented (many orders of magnitude) acceleration of the rates of technological development. There are more grounds for interpreting this point as an indication of an inflection point, after which the pace of global evolution will begin to slow down systematically in the long term.
在不久的将来,我们应该期待“奇点”的想法最近变得相当流行,这主要归功于谷歌在机器训练领域的技术总监雷蒙德·库兹韦尔(Raymond Kurzweil)和他的书《奇点临近》(2005)的活动。这表明,从银河系的出现开始,到DNA密码的解码结束的一系列事件的数学分析(由库兹韦尔在他的名著中描述),确实可以用一个极其简单的数学函数(库兹韦尔自己不知道)来理想地描述,这个函数在2029年有一个奇点。它还表明,类似的时间序列(从地球上的生命开始到信息革命结束——由俄罗斯物理学家亚历山大·帕诺夫完全独立于库兹韦尔组成)也可以用一个数学函数(与上面非常相似,但帕诺夫没有使用)几乎完美地描述,其奇点在2027年。结果表明,该函数与Heinz von Foerster在1960年发现并发表在《科学》杂志上的著名文章中的方程也非常相似——该函数几乎完美地描述了世界人口的动态,并以2027年地区的数学奇点为特征。所有这些都表明,存在着足够严格的全球宏观进化规律(描述我们星球上几十亿年的复杂性进化),这些规律可以用极其简单的数学函数精确地描述。与此同时,在库兹韦尔之后,在奇点区域,没有理由期望技术发展速度出现前所未有的(许多数量级)加速。有更多的理由将这一点解释为一个拐点的迹象,从长远来看,在此之后,全球进化的步伐将开始系统地放缓。