Moment Diagnostics and Quasi-Maximum Likelihood Estimation for the Stochastic Frontier Model

A. Papadopoulos, Christopher F. Parmeter
{"title":"Moment Diagnostics and Quasi-Maximum Likelihood Estimation for the Stochastic Frontier Model","authors":"A. Papadopoulos, Christopher F. Parmeter","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3528423","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The distributional specifications for the composite regression error term most often used in Stochastic Frontier Analysis (SFA) are inherently bounded as regards their skewness and excess kurtosis coefficients. These bounds provide simple diagnostic tools and model selection/rejection criteria for empirical studies which appear to have been overlooked by practitioners. We derive general expressions for the skewness and excess kurtosis of the composed error term in the stochastic frontier model based on the ratio of standard deviations of the two separate error components as well as theoretical ranges for the most popular empirical specifications. Simulation results are presented to detail the small-sample effects as well as to speak towards the practical relevance of these diagnostic tools and the consequences of misspecification. These insights lead us to examine quasi-maximum likelihood estimation (QMLE) of the ubiquitous Normal-Half Normal stochastic frontier model and the properties of the Skew-Normal QMLE, more generally.","PeriodicalId":273058,"journal":{"name":"ERN: Model Construction & Estimation (Topic)","volume":"50 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-12-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ERN: Model Construction & Estimation (Topic)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3528423","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

The distributional specifications for the composite regression error term most often used in Stochastic Frontier Analysis (SFA) are inherently bounded as regards their skewness and excess kurtosis coefficients. These bounds provide simple diagnostic tools and model selection/rejection criteria for empirical studies which appear to have been overlooked by practitioners. We derive general expressions for the skewness and excess kurtosis of the composed error term in the stochastic frontier model based on the ratio of standard deviations of the two separate error components as well as theoretical ranges for the most popular empirical specifications. Simulation results are presented to detail the small-sample effects as well as to speak towards the practical relevance of these diagnostic tools and the consequences of misspecification. These insights lead us to examine quasi-maximum likelihood estimation (QMLE) of the ubiquitous Normal-Half Normal stochastic frontier model and the properties of the Skew-Normal QMLE, more generally.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
随机前沿模型的矩诊断和拟极大似然估计
随机前沿分析(SFA)中最常用的复合回归误差项的分布规范在偏度和过量峰度系数方面具有固有的有界性。这些界限为实证研究提供了简单的诊断工具和模型选择/拒绝标准,这似乎被从业者忽视了。我们根据两个独立误差分量的标准差之比以及最流行的经验规范的理论范围,推导出随机前沿模型中组成误差项的偏度和过量峰度的一般表达式。模拟结果详细介绍了小样本效应,以及讨论这些诊断工具的实际相关性和错误规范的后果。这些见解引导我们研究普遍存在的正态-半正态随机前沿模型的拟极大似然估计(QMLE)以及更普遍的偏正态QMLE的性质。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Nonparametric Tests of Conditional Independence for Time Series Estimating Demand with Multi-Homing in Two-Sided Markets Does Court Type, Size and Employee Satisfaction Affect Court Speed?. Hierarchical Linear Modelling With Evidence from Kenya Development of Estimation and Forecasting Method in Intelligent Decision Support Systems Estimating Financial Networks by Realized Interdependencies: A Restricted Autoregressive Approach
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1