How to Use Analytical Tools to Forecast Injectivity in Polymer Floods

E. Delamaide
{"title":"How to Use Analytical Tools to Forecast Injectivity in Polymer Floods","authors":"E. Delamaide","doi":"10.2118/195513-MS","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n One of the main uncertainties when designing polymer floods is the polymer injectivity, an important parameter that can affect the economics of the process. Reservoir simulation can be used to forecast injectivity, but the process is not straightforward and can be affected by grid size and other factors. Analytical methods are also available for that purpose, but they are considered too simplistic to deal with realistic reservoir conditions. The aim of this paper is to show that this is not the case and that simple analytical tools can be accurate and of great help to predict or history match polymer injectivity.\n The analytical method has been developed by Lake in his classical textbook on Enhanced Oil Recovery, but few applications are documented in the literature. This paper will review the method and corresponding equations before presenting several actual field cases of injectivity in polymer flood pilots or tests from several countries that have been matched analytically.\n Although it has not been used very often, the method has been found to give very good results in most of the field cases tested in a variety of situations; these cases will be presented along with recommendations on how to apply the method and a discussion of the results. Sensitivities to the various parameters will also be presented. Once the equations are programmed in a spreadsheet, the matching process takes only a few minutes and it is easy to run various scenarios and sensitivities.\n Polymer injectivity remains one of the less understood and less predictable aspects of polymer flood projects. This paper will encourage engineers who are planning such projects to use simple yet accurate analytical tools before embarking in more complex and time-consuming reservoir simulations.","PeriodicalId":103248,"journal":{"name":"Day 4 Thu, June 06, 2019","volume":"18 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-06-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"8","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Day 4 Thu, June 06, 2019","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2118/195513-MS","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 8

Abstract

One of the main uncertainties when designing polymer floods is the polymer injectivity, an important parameter that can affect the economics of the process. Reservoir simulation can be used to forecast injectivity, but the process is not straightforward and can be affected by grid size and other factors. Analytical methods are also available for that purpose, but they are considered too simplistic to deal with realistic reservoir conditions. The aim of this paper is to show that this is not the case and that simple analytical tools can be accurate and of great help to predict or history match polymer injectivity. The analytical method has been developed by Lake in his classical textbook on Enhanced Oil Recovery, but few applications are documented in the literature. This paper will review the method and corresponding equations before presenting several actual field cases of injectivity in polymer flood pilots or tests from several countries that have been matched analytically. Although it has not been used very often, the method has been found to give very good results in most of the field cases tested in a variety of situations; these cases will be presented along with recommendations on how to apply the method and a discussion of the results. Sensitivities to the various parameters will also be presented. Once the equations are programmed in a spreadsheet, the matching process takes only a few minutes and it is easy to run various scenarios and sensitivities. Polymer injectivity remains one of the less understood and less predictable aspects of polymer flood projects. This paper will encourage engineers who are planning such projects to use simple yet accurate analytical tools before embarking in more complex and time-consuming reservoir simulations.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
如何利用分析工具预测聚合物驱的注入能力
聚合物驱设计的主要不确定因素之一是聚合物注入能力,这是影响该工艺经济性的一个重要参数。油藏模拟可用于预测注入能力,但其过程并不简单,而且可能受到网格大小和其他因素的影响。分析方法也可用于这一目的,但它们被认为过于简单,无法处理实际的储层条件。本文的目的是表明,情况并非如此,简单的分析工具可以准确地帮助预测或历史匹配聚合物注入。这种分析方法是由Lake在他的经典教科书《提高采收率》中提出的,但在文献中很少有应用记录。本文将回顾该方法和相应的方程,然后介绍几个国家的聚合物驱试验或测试的实际现场案例,并进行分析匹配。虽然该方法并没有被经常使用,但在各种情况下测试的大多数现场案例中,该方法都得到了非常好的结果;这些案例将与如何应用该方法的建议以及对结果的讨论一起提出。还将介绍对各种参数的灵敏度。一旦将方程编程到电子表格中,匹配过程只需几分钟,并且很容易运行各种场景和灵敏度。聚合物注入能力仍然是聚合物驱项目中鲜为人知和难以预测的方面之一。本文将鼓励计划此类项目的工程师在进行更复杂和耗时的油藏模拟之前,使用简单而准确的分析工具。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Investigation of Pore Structure and Fractal Characteristics in an Organic-Rich Shale Gas-Condensate Reservoir from the Duvernay Formation Can Unconventional Completion Systems Revolutionise EGS? A Critical Technology Review Evaluation of CO2-EOR Performance and Storage Mechanisms in an Active Partially Depleted Oil Reservoir Novel Method For Mitigating Injectivity Issues During Polymer Flooding at High Salinity Conditions Formation Induced Well Deformation
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1