Cost-effective technique for medial meniscus posterior root tear repair

Z. Zakaria, Ahmed Ghazi
{"title":"Cost-effective technique for medial meniscus posterior root tear repair","authors":"Z. Zakaria, Ahmed Ghazi","doi":"10.4103/eoj.eoj_99_21","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Purpose This study aimed at determining the effectiveness of medial meniscus posterior root repair by transosseous pull-out sutures, relying on readily available tools. Patients and methods Thirty-four patients, aged between 18 and 49 years old of both sexes, with isolated post-traumatic meniscal root tear, operated between September 2013 and September 2015, were prospectively evaluated clinically in terms of Lysholm and Tegner scoring systems. Successful repair was measured by improvement of gap sign, ghost sign, and meniscal extrusion. Results The study group had 18 females and 16 males, mean age was 40.8±6.9 years, mean BMI was 30.5±4.9 kg/m2. The mean follow-up duration was 24.5 months. Lysholm and Tegner scores improved significantly (P=0.000). Complete healing occurred in 20 cases (P=0.000), and partial healing in 10 cases (P=0.000), failure occurred in four cases. Both absolute and relative meniscal extrusion decreased by −1.2±1.5 mm (P=0.01) and −0.12±0.15 (P=0.007), respectively. Conclusions Meniscal root repair by transosseous pull-out suture is a cost-effective and reproducible technique that yields good structural and functional results. This was objectively confirmed both functionally and radiologically in 88% of cases fixed by this technique.","PeriodicalId":171084,"journal":{"name":"The Egyptian Orthopaedic Journal","volume":"9 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Egyptian Orthopaedic Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/eoj.eoj_99_21","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose This study aimed at determining the effectiveness of medial meniscus posterior root repair by transosseous pull-out sutures, relying on readily available tools. Patients and methods Thirty-four patients, aged between 18 and 49 years old of both sexes, with isolated post-traumatic meniscal root tear, operated between September 2013 and September 2015, were prospectively evaluated clinically in terms of Lysholm and Tegner scoring systems. Successful repair was measured by improvement of gap sign, ghost sign, and meniscal extrusion. Results The study group had 18 females and 16 males, mean age was 40.8±6.9 years, mean BMI was 30.5±4.9 kg/m2. The mean follow-up duration was 24.5 months. Lysholm and Tegner scores improved significantly (P=0.000). Complete healing occurred in 20 cases (P=0.000), and partial healing in 10 cases (P=0.000), failure occurred in four cases. Both absolute and relative meniscal extrusion decreased by −1.2±1.5 mm (P=0.01) and −0.12±0.15 (P=0.007), respectively. Conclusions Meniscal root repair by transosseous pull-out suture is a cost-effective and reproducible technique that yields good structural and functional results. This was objectively confirmed both functionally and radiologically in 88% of cases fixed by this technique.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
经济高效的内侧半月板后根撕裂修复技术
目的本研究旨在确定经骨拔出缝合线修复内侧半月板后根的有效性,依赖于现成的工具。患者与方法采用Lysholm和Tegner评分系统对2013年9月至2015年9月手术的34例孤立性创伤后半月板根撕裂患者进行前瞻性临床评价,患者年龄18 ~ 49岁,男女均可。通过间隙征、鬼影征和半月板挤压的改善来衡量修复是否成功。结果研究组女性18例,男性16例,平均年龄40.8±6.9岁,平均BMI为30.5±4.9 kg/m2。平均随访时间为24.5个月。Lysholm和Tegner评分显著提高(P=0.000)。完全愈合20例(P=0.000),部分愈合10例(P=0.000),失败4例。绝对半月板挤压和相对半月板挤压分别减少- 1.2±1.5 mm (P=0.01)和- 0.12±0.15 mm (P=0.007)。结论经骨拔出缝合线修复半月板根是一种成本低、可重复性好的技术,具有良好的结构和功能效果。88%采用该技术固定的病例在功能和放射学上都客观证实了这一点。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Are olecranon osteotomies preferred to triceps-elevating approaches in intraarticular distal humerus fractures? A literature review Comparative study of posterior lumbar interbody fusion by strut laminar autograft versus cage in degenerative lumbar spine diseases Distal fibula locked plate versus nonlocked plate for treatment of Danis Weber type B fracture comparative prospective study Assessment of lateral malleolus weber C fractures’ outcomes in patients undergoing syndesmosis-only fixation versus syndesmosis and fibular fixation Anterior odontoid lag screw fixation in type II odontoid fractures
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1