Using robot pets instead of companion animals for older people: a case of 'reinventing the wheel'?

S. Coghlan, Jenny Waycott, B. Neves, F. Vetere
{"title":"Using robot pets instead of companion animals for older people: a case of 'reinventing the wheel'?","authors":"S. Coghlan, Jenny Waycott, B. Neves, F. Vetere","doi":"10.1145/3292147.3292176","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Robot pets are being developed and deployed to provide companionship for older adults. While robot pets offer some therapeutic benefits, their intended use for 'companionship' often provokes ethical debate, including concern that interactions with robot pets are demeaning or lack value compared to other social interactions. Another concern is that robot pets provide no real advantages over companion animals. This conceptual paper draws on philosophy, human-animal bond research, and technology development in robotics, to consider whether robot pets provide new opportunities for companionship as opposed to just 'reinventing the wheel'. We argue that robot pets may sometimes be as beneficial as companion animals or offer something different and distinctive. The paper provides a foundation for further multidisciplinary research to advance understanding of the ethical issues and the opportunities and challenges that arise in our ongoing and changing relationships with new technologies such as robot pets.","PeriodicalId":309502,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the 30th Australian Conference on Computer-Human Interaction","volume":"7 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-12-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"23","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the 30th Australian Conference on Computer-Human Interaction","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/3292147.3292176","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 23

Abstract

Robot pets are being developed and deployed to provide companionship for older adults. While robot pets offer some therapeutic benefits, their intended use for 'companionship' often provokes ethical debate, including concern that interactions with robot pets are demeaning or lack value compared to other social interactions. Another concern is that robot pets provide no real advantages over companion animals. This conceptual paper draws on philosophy, human-animal bond research, and technology development in robotics, to consider whether robot pets provide new opportunities for companionship as opposed to just 'reinventing the wheel'. We argue that robot pets may sometimes be as beneficial as companion animals or offer something different and distinctive. The paper provides a foundation for further multidisciplinary research to advance understanding of the ethical issues and the opportunities and challenges that arise in our ongoing and changing relationships with new technologies such as robot pets.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
用机器人宠物代替老年人的伴侣动物:这是“重新发明轮子”吗?
机器人宠物正在开发和部署,为老年人提供陪伴。虽然机器人宠物提供了一些治疗效果,但它们的“陪伴”用途经常引发道德争论,包括担心与其他社交互动相比,与机器人宠物的互动是贬低或缺乏价值的。另一个担忧是,与伴侣动物相比,机器人宠物并没有真正的优势。这篇概念性论文借鉴了哲学、人与动物关系研究和机器人技术的发展,来考虑机器人宠物是否为陪伴提供了新的机会,而不仅仅是“重新发明轮子”。我们认为,机器人宠物有时可能和伴侣动物一样有益,或者提供一些不同的、独特的东西。本文为进一步的多学科研究提供了基础,以促进对伦理问题的理解,以及我们与机器人宠物等新技术之间不断变化的关系中出现的机遇和挑战。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Investigating blind people's preferences when exploring maps using static and rotatable audio-tactile maps at different orientations Days of our lives: family experiences of digital technology use Center of pressure estimation and gait pattern recognition using shoes with photo-reflective sensors Investigating differences between native english and non-native english speakers in interacting with a voice user interface: a case of google home Understanding online collectible card game players' motivations: a survey study with two games
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1