Economic significance of geotechnical uncertainties in open pit mines

R. Jele, M. Dunn
{"title":"Economic significance of geotechnical uncertainties in open pit mines","authors":"R. Jele, M. Dunn","doi":"10.36487/ACG_REP/1905_04_JELE","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The major cost associated with open pit mine operations is waste stripping. While the steepening of slope angles reduces the stripping ratio, and hence operational costs, it also increases the likelihood of failure. Major slope failures incur significant cost elements including clean-up, disruption to mine operation, and damage to mining equipment and in some cases loss of reserves. Geotechnical engineers are often faced with the difficult task of finding the balance between slope optimisation and acceptable risk related to the likelihood of large slope failures. Technological advancements have allowed for the development of larger and deeper open pit operations, but have also created higher economic impact from potential slope failures. Given that the aim of mining operators is to maximise overall profits, it is surprising that most slope designs are based on deterministic design approaches, and limited attention is given to quantifying uncertainties in the geotechnical model. As most major decisions in the mining industry are made by senior management staff and financial staff, any attempt on linking slope stability analysis results with monetary values would improve the critical communication between geotechnical designers and decision-makers. \nUsing Cowal Gold Mine as a case study, this paper illustrates economic risk caused by geotechnical uncertainties. The geotechnical risk estimate is generally subjective due to geotechnical engineers having to rely on limited data and engineering judgement. Geotechnical risk is compared against economic factors that are often perceived as important variables in mining operations.","PeriodicalId":337751,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the First International Conference on Mining Geomechanical Risk","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-04-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the First International Conference on Mining Geomechanical Risk","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.36487/ACG_REP/1905_04_JELE","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

The major cost associated with open pit mine operations is waste stripping. While the steepening of slope angles reduces the stripping ratio, and hence operational costs, it also increases the likelihood of failure. Major slope failures incur significant cost elements including clean-up, disruption to mine operation, and damage to mining equipment and in some cases loss of reserves. Geotechnical engineers are often faced with the difficult task of finding the balance between slope optimisation and acceptable risk related to the likelihood of large slope failures. Technological advancements have allowed for the development of larger and deeper open pit operations, but have also created higher economic impact from potential slope failures. Given that the aim of mining operators is to maximise overall profits, it is surprising that most slope designs are based on deterministic design approaches, and limited attention is given to quantifying uncertainties in the geotechnical model. As most major decisions in the mining industry are made by senior management staff and financial staff, any attempt on linking slope stability analysis results with monetary values would improve the critical communication between geotechnical designers and decision-makers. Using Cowal Gold Mine as a case study, this paper illustrates economic risk caused by geotechnical uncertainties. The geotechnical risk estimate is generally subjective due to geotechnical engineers having to rely on limited data and engineering judgement. Geotechnical risk is compared against economic factors that are often perceived as important variables in mining operations.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
露天矿岩土不确定性的经济意义
露天矿作业的主要成本是剥离废物。虽然斜角的变陡降低了剥离比,从而降低了运营成本,但也增加了失效的可能性。严重的边坡破坏会造成大量的费用,包括清理、采矿作业中断、采矿设备损坏以及在某些情况下损失储备。岩土工程师经常面临着在边坡优化和与大边坡破坏可能性相关的可接受风险之间找到平衡的艰巨任务。技术的进步使得更大、更深的露天矿作业得以发展,但潜在的边坡破坏也造成了更大的经济影响。考虑到采矿经营者的目标是使整体利润最大化,令人惊讶的是,大多数边坡设计都是基于确定性设计方法,并且对岩土模型中不确定性的量化关注有限。由于采矿业的大多数重大决策都是由高级管理人员和财务人员做出的,任何将边坡稳定性分析结果与货币价值联系起来的尝试都将改善岩土设计人员与决策者之间的关键沟通。本文以煤金矿为例,分析了地质不确定性带来的经济风险。岩土工程风险评估通常是主观的,因为岩土工程工程师不得不依赖有限的数据和工程判断。岩土工程风险与经济因素相比较,经济因素通常被认为是采矿作业中的重要变量。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Geotechnical risk-informed decision-making in mining Using qualitative risk assessment as a leading indicator for geotechnical risk in mining Construction of a damage risk model for footwall drifts Quantifying uncertainty in mining geomechanics design Development of the Mine Geotechnical Risk Index
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1