Call-In Talk Radio: Compensation or Enrichment

E. Perse, J. S. Butler
{"title":"Call-In Talk Radio: Compensation or Enrichment","authors":"E. Perse, J. S. Butler","doi":"10.1207/s15506843jrs1202_3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study focused on call-in talk radio because it provides a unique opportunity to test competing hypotheses drawn from two different perspectives about the appeal of media programming. A good deal of research on call-in talk radio grows from a deficiency perspective, which holds that people seek out media content to fill gaps in their lives. More recent research, however, suggests that, like the selection of other media content, the appeal of talk radio lies in enrichment, or its ability to provide content for specialized interests. A random telephone survey tested competing hypotheses that compared listeners to call-in talk radio with nonlisteners. For the most part, the results supported an enrichment explanation. Compared to nonlisteners, listeners to call-in talk radio listened to the programs for information, perceived themselves as more mobile, and valued arguments. Compared to nonlisteners, callers to the programs were also more civically engaged. Moreover, listening to various subformats of talk radio programs was also likely to signal enrichment.","PeriodicalId":331997,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Radio Studies","volume":"28 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2005-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"16","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Radio Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1207/s15506843jrs1202_3","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 16

Abstract

This study focused on call-in talk radio because it provides a unique opportunity to test competing hypotheses drawn from two different perspectives about the appeal of media programming. A good deal of research on call-in talk radio grows from a deficiency perspective, which holds that people seek out media content to fill gaps in their lives. More recent research, however, suggests that, like the selection of other media content, the appeal of talk radio lies in enrichment, or its ability to provide content for specialized interests. A random telephone survey tested competing hypotheses that compared listeners to call-in talk radio with nonlisteners. For the most part, the results supported an enrichment explanation. Compared to nonlisteners, listeners to call-in talk radio listened to the programs for information, perceived themselves as more mobile, and valued arguments. Compared to nonlisteners, callers to the programs were also more civically engaged. Moreover, listening to various subformats of talk radio programs was also likely to signal enrichment.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
电话访谈电台:补偿或充实
本研究聚焦于电话访谈电台,因为它提供了一个独特的机会来检验从媒体节目吸引力的两种不同角度得出的相互竞争的假设。大量关于电台访谈节目的研究都是从一个不足的角度出发的,认为人们寻找媒体内容来填补他们生活中的空白。然而,最近的研究表明,就像其他媒体内容的选择一样,谈话广播的吸引力在于其丰富性,或者说它为特定兴趣提供内容的能力。一项随机的电话调查测试了一些相互矛盾的假设,将接听电话的谈话电台听众与不接听电话的听众进行了比较。在很大程度上,研究结果支持了一种富集解释。与不听广播的人相比,收听热线谈话节目的人收听节目是为了获取信息,认为自己更灵活,更重视争论。与不听这些节目的人相比,打电话的人也更积极参与公民活动。此外,收听各种谈话广播节目的子格式也可能是丰富的信号。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Stephen Sposato and Wm. A. Smith. Radio: A Post Nine-Eleven Strategy for Reaching the World's Poor. Lanham, Maryland: University Press of America, Inc., 2005 The Factors Affecting Radio Format Diversity After the Telecommunications Act of 1996: Ownership Concentration, Stations and Audience Community Radio and Social Activism in Chile 1990–2007: Challenges for Grass Roots Voices During the Transition to Democracy Indie to an Extent? Why Music Gets Added to College Radio Playlists Editor's Remarks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1