L. LAMONEDA-GADEA, L. Moril-Peñalver, M. Fernández-Ruiz, FA LÓPEZ-PRATS
{"title":"FRACTURAS COMPLEJAS DE RÓTULA:¿OSTEOSÍNTESIS CON BANDA DE TENSIÓN O PLACA BLOQUEADA?","authors":"L. LAMONEDA-GADEA, L. Moril-Peñalver, M. Fernández-Ruiz, FA LÓPEZ-PRATS","doi":"10.37315/sotocav2021285561","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The gold Standard in the treatment of patella fractures is generally the tension band technique.Recently, the treatment of these fractures by means of plate osteosyntehsis has been implemented, obtaining good results, and a low rate of complications and reinterventions. GOAL: Evaluate the clinic, functional and radiologic results in patients with a complex patella fracture, comparing results of plate osteosynthesis treatment versus tension band. MATERIAL AND METHODOLOGY:Retrospective obvervational cohort study. A total of sixty patients with patella fracture were evaluated at Hospital General Universitario de Elche between 2015 and 2020, thirty by tension bands technique and the other thirty with plate osteosynthesis treatment. All the clinic, functional and radiologic results, as well as complication were registered and compared for both groups. RESULTS: The functional scales show no differences (LES p = 0.475, EVA p = 0.888, KOS-ADLS p = 0.327). Differences have been found (p <0.001) in relation to the extraction of osteosynthesis material (EMO) in patients operated on with BT (50% vs 0%). We identified more material failure in BT (37.5%) versus 0% in plate (p = 0.001). The flexion ranges were higher in the plate group (120.42º) compared to BT (110º) without statistically significant differences. There are no differences in relation to scarring, infection, stiffness, pseudoarthrosis, patella magna or low, loss of reduction or deep vein thrombosis. CONCLUSIONS: All the patients with patella fracture that were evaluated presented successful clinic and functional results. However, we found a lower rate of complication and reinterventions on the plate osteosynthesis treatment. In summary, it has been proved that plate osteosynthesis treatment is a successful holding method for complex patella fractures.","PeriodicalId":202353,"journal":{"name":"Revista Española de Cirugía Osteoarticular","volume":"41 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista Española de Cirugía Osteoarticular","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.37315/sotocav2021285561","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
The gold Standard in the treatment of patella fractures is generally the tension band technique.Recently, the treatment of these fractures by means of plate osteosyntehsis has been implemented, obtaining good results, and a low rate of complications and reinterventions. GOAL: Evaluate the clinic, functional and radiologic results in patients with a complex patella fracture, comparing results of plate osteosynthesis treatment versus tension band. MATERIAL AND METHODOLOGY:Retrospective obvervational cohort study. A total of sixty patients with patella fracture were evaluated at Hospital General Universitario de Elche between 2015 and 2020, thirty by tension bands technique and the other thirty with plate osteosynthesis treatment. All the clinic, functional and radiologic results, as well as complication were registered and compared for both groups. RESULTS: The functional scales show no differences (LES p = 0.475, EVA p = 0.888, KOS-ADLS p = 0.327). Differences have been found (p <0.001) in relation to the extraction of osteosynthesis material (EMO) in patients operated on with BT (50% vs 0%). We identified more material failure in BT (37.5%) versus 0% in plate (p = 0.001). The flexion ranges were higher in the plate group (120.42º) compared to BT (110º) without statistically significant differences. There are no differences in relation to scarring, infection, stiffness, pseudoarthrosis, patella magna or low, loss of reduction or deep vein thrombosis. CONCLUSIONS: All the patients with patella fracture that were evaluated presented successful clinic and functional results. However, we found a lower rate of complication and reinterventions on the plate osteosynthesis treatment. In summary, it has been proved that plate osteosynthesis treatment is a successful holding method for complex patella fractures.
治疗髌骨骨折的金标准通常是张力带技术。近年来,采用钢板内固定术治疗这些骨折,取得了良好的效果,并发症和再干预率低。目的:评估复杂髌骨骨折患者的临床、功能和影像学结果,比较钢板固定治疗和张力带治疗的结果。材料和方法:回顾性观察队列研究。2015年至2020年,我们在埃尔切总医院对60例髌骨骨折患者进行了评估,其中30例采用张力带技术,30例采用钢板固定治疗。对两组患者的临床、功能、影像学结果及并发症进行比较。结果:功能量表差异无统计学意义(LES p = 0.475, EVA p = 0.888, KOS-ADLS p = 0.327)。在BT手术患者中,与骨合成材料(EMO)的提取有关(50% vs 0%)发现差异(p <0.001)。我们发现BT组的材料失败率更高(37.5%),而钢板组为0% (p = 0.001)。钢板组屈曲幅度(120.42º)高于BT组(110º),但差异无统计学意义。瘢痕、感染、僵硬、假关节、大髌骨或低髌骨、复位丧失或深静脉血栓形成方面没有差异。结论:所有评估的髌骨骨折患者均取得了良好的临床和功能效果。然而,我们发现钢板内固定治疗的并发症和再干预率较低。综上所述,钢板固定治疗是复杂髌骨骨折的一种成功的固定方法。