Project-Based and Assignment-Based Courses: A Study of Piazza Engagement and Gender in Online Courses

Ryan Lenfant, Alice Wanner, J. R. Hott, Raymond Pettit
{"title":"Project-Based and Assignment-Based Courses: A Study of Piazza Engagement and Gender in Online Courses","authors":"Ryan Lenfant, Alice Wanner, J. R. Hott, Raymond Pettit","doi":"10.1145/3587102.3588833","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Project-based (PB) learning has become increasingly popular in computer science education, particularly as studies have found that the teaching style better prepares students for future careers and improves learning outcomes through increased student engagement. Online forum usage is one measurable component of engagement. In order to study the impact of PB learning on online forum engagement, Piazza usage data from seven online computer science courses at a higher education institution were collected and examined. We analyzed the differences in online forum usage between PB and assignment-based (AB) learning, in addition to differences between men and women in each course type. Specifically, this study builds upon and replicates a previous study on Piazza that measured student engagement, anonymity usage, and peer parity. We found that students in PB courses were less actively engaged in online forums than students in AB courses; they were less likely to ask and answer questions on Piazza but were more likely to view posts and be logged on more days. Across both course types, students posted anonymously a similar amount as a proportion of the total number of questions and answers and experienced a proportionally similar amount of peer parity. Our findings mirror prior results on gender engagement on Piazza. Across both PB and AB courses, women were more engaged, asked and viewed more questions, posted anonymously more frequently, and were less likely to experience peer parity than men.","PeriodicalId":410890,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the 2023 Conference on Innovation and Technology in Computer Science Education V. 1","volume":"3 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the 2023 Conference on Innovation and Technology in Computer Science Education V. 1","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/3587102.3588833","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Project-based (PB) learning has become increasingly popular in computer science education, particularly as studies have found that the teaching style better prepares students for future careers and improves learning outcomes through increased student engagement. Online forum usage is one measurable component of engagement. In order to study the impact of PB learning on online forum engagement, Piazza usage data from seven online computer science courses at a higher education institution were collected and examined. We analyzed the differences in online forum usage between PB and assignment-based (AB) learning, in addition to differences between men and women in each course type. Specifically, this study builds upon and replicates a previous study on Piazza that measured student engagement, anonymity usage, and peer parity. We found that students in PB courses were less actively engaged in online forums than students in AB courses; they were less likely to ask and answer questions on Piazza but were more likely to view posts and be logged on more days. Across both course types, students posted anonymously a similar amount as a proportion of the total number of questions and answers and experienced a proportionally similar amount of peer parity. Our findings mirror prior results on gender engagement on Piazza. Across both PB and AB courses, women were more engaged, asked and viewed more questions, posted anonymously more frequently, and were less likely to experience peer parity than men.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
项目型与作业型课程:网络课程中广场参与度与性别研究
基于项目(PB)的学习在计算机科学教育中越来越受欢迎,特别是研究发现,这种教学方式可以更好地为学生未来的职业生涯做好准备,并通过增加学生的参与度来提高学习成果。在线论坛的使用是用户粘性的一个可衡量的组成部分。为了研究PB学习对在线论坛参与的影响,我们收集并检验了某高等院校7门在线计算机科学课程的Piazza使用数据。我们分析了在线论坛在PB和基于作业(AB)学习中的使用差异,以及每种课程类型中男性和女性的差异。具体来说,这项研究建立并复制了先前对Piazza的一项研究,该研究测量了学生的参与度、匿名使用情况和同伴平等。我们发现,PB课程的学生参与网络论坛的积极性低于AB课程的学生;他们不太可能在Piazza上提问和回答问题,但更有可能查看帖子,并且登录的时间更长。在这两种课程类型中,学生匿名发布的问题和答案占总问题和答案的比例相似,并且经历了比例相似的同龄人平等。我们的发现反映了先前关于Piazza上性别参与的结果。在PB和AB课程中,女性的参与度更高,提问和查看的问题更多,匿名发帖的频率更高,而且与男性相比,女性更不可能经历同龄人平等。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Automatic Problem Generation for CTF-Style Assessments in IT Forensics Courses The Value of Time Extensions in Identifying Students Abilities Studied Questions in Data Structures and Algorithms Assessments Exploring CS1 Student's Notions of Code Quality Pseudocode vs. Compile-and-Run Prompts: Comparing Measures of Student Programming Ability in CS1 and CS2
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1