Static and Fatigue Tests on Ductal® UHPFRC Footbridge Sections

G. Parsekian, N. Shrive, T. Brown, J. Kroman, Perry, A. Boucher
{"title":"Static and Fatigue Tests on Ductal® UHPFRC Footbridge Sections","authors":"G. Parsekian, N. Shrive, T. Brown, J. Kroman, Perry, A. Boucher","doi":"10.14359/20180","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper describes how static and fatigue flexural tests were performed on transverse sections of a 33.6 m (110.2 ft) Ductal® ultra-high performance fiber-reinforced concrete (UHPFRC) girder for a single-span, 53 m (173.9 ft) pedestrian overpass to be built in the City of Calgary, Canada. Load tests were performed on three 1 m long, full-width and full-depth slab sections. In the first and second tests, the concrete was reinforced with, 13 mm (0.51 in.) long steel fibers (2% by volume). The sections were also reinforced with glass fiber reinforced polymer (GFRP) bars and tested to failure under monotonic loading. The specimens cracked and failed at similar loads. The third specimen had no reinforcement other than the steel fibers. Initially, the specimen was loaded until it cracked. Subsequently the specimen was subjected to 1 million cycles between 20 and 80% of the design service load, followed by a second million load cycles over a load range of 20 to 80% of the observed first-crack load. As the specimen did not fail under this loading regimen, nor was there any observed degradation of stiffness, a third million load cycles were applied to 20 to 80% of the failure load of the sections with GFRP reinforcement. Static tests were performed to evaluate the specimen stiffness several times during the fatigue test. The service load range was not observed to cause damage to the specimen. Some stiffness degradation was noted during the beginning of the third million cycles of loading, but stabilized at about two thirds of the original stiffness. Subsequent to fatigue testing, the specimen was loaded to failure, with collapse occurring at a load higher than predicted. The compressive strength of the Ductal® concrete used in these tests was over 200 MPa (29,008 psi) and the tensile strength at first crack was over 8 MPa (1,160 psi).","PeriodicalId":410288,"journal":{"name":"SP-253: Fifth ACI/CANMET/IBRACON Int'l Conference on High-Performance Concrete Structures & Materials","volume":"7 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2008-07-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"8","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"SP-253: Fifth ACI/CANMET/IBRACON Int'l Conference on High-Performance Concrete Structures & Materials","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14359/20180","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 8

Abstract

This paper describes how static and fatigue flexural tests were performed on transverse sections of a 33.6 m (110.2 ft) Ductal® ultra-high performance fiber-reinforced concrete (UHPFRC) girder for a single-span, 53 m (173.9 ft) pedestrian overpass to be built in the City of Calgary, Canada. Load tests were performed on three 1 m long, full-width and full-depth slab sections. In the first and second tests, the concrete was reinforced with, 13 mm (0.51 in.) long steel fibers (2% by volume). The sections were also reinforced with glass fiber reinforced polymer (GFRP) bars and tested to failure under monotonic loading. The specimens cracked and failed at similar loads. The third specimen had no reinforcement other than the steel fibers. Initially, the specimen was loaded until it cracked. Subsequently the specimen was subjected to 1 million cycles between 20 and 80% of the design service load, followed by a second million load cycles over a load range of 20 to 80% of the observed first-crack load. As the specimen did not fail under this loading regimen, nor was there any observed degradation of stiffness, a third million load cycles were applied to 20 to 80% of the failure load of the sections with GFRP reinforcement. Static tests were performed to evaluate the specimen stiffness several times during the fatigue test. The service load range was not observed to cause damage to the specimen. Some stiffness degradation was noted during the beginning of the third million cycles of loading, but stabilized at about two thirds of the original stiffness. Subsequent to fatigue testing, the specimen was loaded to failure, with collapse occurring at a load higher than predicted. The compressive strength of the Ductal® concrete used in these tests was over 200 MPa (29,008 psi) and the tensile strength at first crack was over 8 MPa (1,160 psi).
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Ductal®UHPFRC人行桥截面静力和疲劳试验
本文描述了如何在加拿大卡尔加里市建造的单跨53米(173.9英尺)人行天桥的33.6米(110.2英尺)Ductal®超高性能纤维增强混凝土(UHPFRC)梁的横剖面上进行静态和疲劳弯曲试验。荷载试验在三个1米长、全宽、全深的板条上进行。在第一次和第二次试验中,混凝土用13毫米(0.51英寸)长的钢纤维(体积比2%)进行加固。采用玻璃纤维增强聚合物(GFRP)筋对截面进行了加固,并进行了单调荷载下的破坏试验。这些试件在相似的荷载下开裂和破坏。第三个试件除钢纤维外无其他增强物。最初,试样被加载,直到它破裂。随后,试件在20%至80%的设计服务荷载范围内进行了100万次循环,随后在20%至80%的首次裂缝荷载范围内进行了第二次100万次循环。由于在这种加载方案下,试件没有破坏,也没有观察到刚度的退化,因此对GFRP加固截面的20%至80%的破坏荷载施加了第三百万次加载循环。在疲劳试验中,进行了多次静力试验来评估试件的刚度。工作载荷范围内未观察到对试件造成损伤。在第三百万次加载循环开始时,注意到一些刚度退化,但稳定在原始刚度的三分之二左右。在疲劳试验之后,试样被加载到破坏状态,在高于预期的载荷下发生崩溃。在这些试验中使用的Ductal®混凝土的抗压强度超过200 MPa (29,008 psi),第一次裂缝的抗拉强度超过8 MPa (1,160 psi)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Hybrid Techniques for RC Column Strengthening Parameters for Self-Compacting Concrete Mortar Phase A Practical Mix Design Method for Self-Compacting Concrete Infl uence of Transversal Reinforcement on Plastic Rotation Capacity of High-Strength Beams Effect of Coarse Aggregate Shape and Texture on Self-Compactability
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1