Modified Viterbi algorithm for predictive TCQ

T. Ji, W. Stark
{"title":"Modified Viterbi algorithm for predictive TCQ","authors":"T. Ji, W. Stark","doi":"10.1109/DCC.1999.785689","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Summary form only given. A hybrid trellis-tree search algorithm, the H-PTCQ, which has the same storage requirement as PTCQ and, is presented. We assume 2 survivor paths are kept at each state. It is straightforward to extend the algorithm to the cases where n/spl ges/2. Simulation is conducted over 20-second speech samples using DPCM, PTCQ and H-PTCQ. The data sequence is truncated into blocks of 1024 samples. The optimal codebooks for a memoryless Laplacian source are used. Predictor coefficients for the 1st-order and 2nd-order predictors are {0.8456} and {1.3435, -0.5888}, respectively. Simulation results indicate that both PTCQ and H-PTCQ have about 3 dB gain over DPCM. H-PTCQ with 8-state convolutional code has about 0.2 to 0.3 db gain over PTCQ for the same trellis size; H-PTCQ with 256-state convolutional code has 0.05 to 0.1 dB gain over the PTCQ counterpart. Compared with a 2M-state PTCQ, the M-state H-PTCQ has the same computational complexity and uses half of the path memory. Since the performance improvement of an an 8-state PTCQ over a 4-state PTCQ is about 0.4 dB for a similar set of data, the 0.2 to 0.3 dB gain obtained by using H-PTCQ is quite remarkable. Notice that H-PTQ enables a transmitter to adapt performance according to the resource constraints without changing PTCQ receivers. It is also interesting to observe that the 0.1 dB gain of an 8-state TCQ against a 4-state TCQ plus the 0.3 dB gain of H-PTCQ is about the gain of an 8-state PTCQ over a 4-state PTCQ. The results for 256-state quantization also agree with this observation. Therefore, we conclude that most of the gain of a 2M- over M-state PTCQ comes from the better internal TCQ quantizer, and mostly from the better prediction by keeping more paths.","PeriodicalId":103598,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings DCC'99 Data Compression Conference (Cat. No. PR00096)","volume":"35 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1999-03-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings DCC'99 Data Compression Conference (Cat. No. PR00096)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/DCC.1999.785689","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Summary form only given. A hybrid trellis-tree search algorithm, the H-PTCQ, which has the same storage requirement as PTCQ and, is presented. We assume 2 survivor paths are kept at each state. It is straightforward to extend the algorithm to the cases where n/spl ges/2. Simulation is conducted over 20-second speech samples using DPCM, PTCQ and H-PTCQ. The data sequence is truncated into blocks of 1024 samples. The optimal codebooks for a memoryless Laplacian source are used. Predictor coefficients for the 1st-order and 2nd-order predictors are {0.8456} and {1.3435, -0.5888}, respectively. Simulation results indicate that both PTCQ and H-PTCQ have about 3 dB gain over DPCM. H-PTCQ with 8-state convolutional code has about 0.2 to 0.3 db gain over PTCQ for the same trellis size; H-PTCQ with 256-state convolutional code has 0.05 to 0.1 dB gain over the PTCQ counterpart. Compared with a 2M-state PTCQ, the M-state H-PTCQ has the same computational complexity and uses half of the path memory. Since the performance improvement of an an 8-state PTCQ over a 4-state PTCQ is about 0.4 dB for a similar set of data, the 0.2 to 0.3 dB gain obtained by using H-PTCQ is quite remarkable. Notice that H-PTQ enables a transmitter to adapt performance according to the resource constraints without changing PTCQ receivers. It is also interesting to observe that the 0.1 dB gain of an 8-state TCQ against a 4-state TCQ plus the 0.3 dB gain of H-PTCQ is about the gain of an 8-state PTCQ over a 4-state PTCQ. The results for 256-state quantization also agree with this observation. Therefore, we conclude that most of the gain of a 2M- over M-state PTCQ comes from the better internal TCQ quantizer, and mostly from the better prediction by keeping more paths.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
预测TCQ的改进Viterbi算法
只提供摘要形式。提出了一种与PTCQ具有相同存储需求的混合网格树搜索算法H-PTCQ。我们假设在每个状态有2条幸存者路径。将该算法扩展到n/spl等于/2的情况是很简单的。利用DPCM、PTCQ和H-PTCQ对20秒语音样本进行仿真。数据序列被截断为1024个样本的块。使用无记忆拉普拉斯源的最佳码本。一阶和二阶预测因子的预测系数分别为{0.8456}和{1.3435,-0.5888}。仿真结果表明,PTCQ和H-PTCQ都比DPCM增益约3db。具有8态卷积码的H-PTCQ在相同网格尺寸下比PTCQ增益约0.2 ~ 0.3 db;具有256状态卷积码的H-PTCQ比PTCQ具有0.05至0.1 dB的增益。与2m状态的PTCQ相比,m状态的H-PTCQ具有相同的计算复杂度,并且占用了一半的路径内存。由于对于类似的数据集,8态PTCQ比4态PTCQ的性能改进约为0.4 dB,因此使用H-PTCQ获得的0.2至0.3 dB增益非常显着。请注意,H-PTQ使发射机能够根据资源限制调整性能,而无需改变PTCQ接收器。同样有趣的是,8态TCQ对4态TCQ的0.1 dB增益加上H-PTCQ的0.3 dB增益大约是8态PTCQ对4态PTCQ的增益。256态量子化的结果也符合这一观察结果。因此,我们得出结论,2M- over m状态PTCQ的大部分增益来自更好的内部TCQ量化器,并且主要来自通过保持更多路径来更好地预测。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Real-time VBR rate control of MPEG video based upon lexicographic bit allocation Performance of quantizers on noisy channels using structured families of codes SICLIC: a simple inter-color lossless image coder Protein is incompressible Encoding time reduction in fractal image compression
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1